Republicans supported that by the way
What was this impeachment about?
Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.Not about a VP being told by his president to get a corrupted official fired.
It is about stonewalling every subpeana and placing a blanket 'nobody say anything' to every employee of the executive branch to cover up his strong arming a foreign nation into manufacturing dirt on his political opponent.
Would you like me to list the republicans who are on record as wanting that guy fired too, trumptard?Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.
Idk if making up anything was needed. Starting to look like alot of democrats are going to jump ship as well.
Trump was asking Ukraine to do a press interview that they started investigations on Biden, it is manufacturing dirt. Biden was acting lawfully.Manufacturing? What does that video clip show? Biden being a dumbass and rating on himself.
Idk if making up anything was needed. Starting to look like alot of democrats are going to jump ship as well.
No problem, Trump will give them one of yours for free, the base will be OK with it and so will the GOP senate. Why he could even throw in the planes as a bonus!
You are so full of it. Biden was acting legally threatening to with hold appointed funds if they didnt fire the prosecutor looking into his son?Trump was asking Ukraine to do a press interview that they started investigations on Biden, it is manufacturing dirt. Biden was acting lawfully.
The prosecutor had already dropped the case into Burisma at that point. So if anything Biden was INCREASING the chance that the company his kid worked for would be investigated.You are so full of it. Biden was acting legally threatening to with hold appointed funds if they didnt fire the prosecutor looking into his son?
Isnt that what the original case for impeachment was about quid pro quo?
Except the Investigation had already been dropped at the time you retardYou are so full of it. Biden was acting legally threatening to with hold appointed funds if they didnt fire the prosecutor looking into his son?
Isnt that what the original case for impeachment was about quid pro quo?
The whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.The prosecutor had already dropped the case into Burisma at that point. So if anything Biden was INCREASING the chance that the company his kid worked for would be investigated.
No, the impeachment inquiry started because Trump illegally withheld the Whistleblower complaint longer than he was legally allowed after it went through all the legal channels and his troll on the Joe Biden got exposed.
Go cry for corrupt grandpa racist somewhere else, pedoloverThe whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.
Why would so many Democrats be getting cold feet if it is justified?
You just jumped topics in mid sentence. To change the subject. Which phone call are you referent to, the one the doctored transcript Trump released that is not actually the real call? Or the second call that was so nice and fluffy that I still don't know if he thought it was the first call and accidentally 'leaked' the wrong transcript the first call.The whistle blower that overheard him speaking on the phone? That no one that was apart of the phone call says he sa said anything illegal or impeachable.
They are not, impeachment will happen, they may let a few Democrats in vulnerable districts to vote against it, but not enough to not pass it.Why would so many Democrats be getting cold feet if it is justified?
Who are the higher ups that said the saw or heard him do something illegal?You just jumped topics in mid sentence. To change the subject. Which phone call are you referent to, the one the doctored transcript Trump released that is not actually the real call? Or the second call that was so nice and fluffy that I still don't know if he thought it was the first call and accidentally 'leaked' the wrong transcript the first call.
The whistleblower doesn't matter, the stuff they said was all corroborated by higher up people who had understood fully what was happening.
And the criminals all hid behind POTUS use of his executive powers like everyone he blesses with his voice is somehow granted the powers of a married people not being able to testify against each other if they don't want to.
They are not, impeachment will happen, they may let a few Democrats in vulnerable districts to vote against it, but not enough to not pass it.
This is on the Republicans to do the right thing, it is out of the Democrats hands outside of investigating Trump's crimes (which is the House of Representatives duty to do oversight).
Trump himselfWho are the higher ups that said the saw or heard him do something illegal?
Trump, Mulvaney, Sessions, Barr, Pimpeo, Pence, they all denied subpoenas. It was obstruction of justice, they should have went to court, and pleaded the fifth. But Trump stopped them from doing that.Who are the higher ups that said the saw or heard him do something illegal?
So in other words they have no witnesses that can testify they seen or heard him break the law.Trump, Mulvaney, Sessions, Barr, Pimpeo, Pence, they all denied subpoenas. It was obstruction of justice, they should have went to court, and pleaded the fifth. But Trump stopped them from doing that.
Which is why the Obstruction of Justice article of Impeachment is there. I will be surprised (and sad) if they don't include all the ones from Mueller too.So in other words they have no witnesses that can testify they seen or heard him break the law.
So they are having an impeachment trial with no evidence?Which is why the Obstruction of Justice article of Impeachment is there. I will be surprised (and sad) if they don't include all the ones from Mueller too.