Creepy Uncle?

Dongage

Active Member
That virtue signalling thing that you do. It is a common way for your kind to run down others in order to compensate for their own lack of success or ability.
I take it you're uncomfortable in your skin. You hate the color of your own skin. What color is it?
 

BurtMaklin

Well-Known Member
No they don't. You don't know anything Burt. Your mother did you a great disservice when she assured you how smart you are. Your false confidence is a major reason why you are such a failure.
Nah, she beat me and told me that I ruined her life and because of me, we (her) had to live so "poor". She was depressed, we came to terms and our relationship is much better. Wasn't really a goal, it just happened.

I don't know what "false" confidence is, is it like when you feel you can judge which people deserve to be treated like people?
 

radiant Rudy

Well-Known Member
Nah, she beat me and told me that I ruined her life and because of me, we (her) had to live so "poor". She was depressed, we came to terms and our relationship is much better. Wasn't really a goal, it just happened.

I don't know what "false" confidence is, is it like when you feel you can judge which people deserve to be treated like people?
False confidence is when youre an ignorant f'en shit bag, lacking in self awareness and critical thought meanwhile you are certain that your beliefs have merit.

You had a difficult situation. But a bruised pussy doesnt make your beliefs and dreams valid.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Not true people are deeply social and the cult of the individual is bullshit, no man is an island Rob, including you, even though yer socially retarded.
Nice conflation, almost smart person. I'm not arguing whether people are social or not. Some are and some are not.

I'm saying that a group of people cannot have greater rights than any of the individuals within it. To believe otherwise is to believe that some people should have special rights that others don't. Which is a rationalization for a forcibly imposed hierarchy, which isn't very sociable.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Nice conflation, almost smart person. I'm not arguing whether people are social or not. Some are and some are not.

I'm saying that a group of people cannot have greater rights than any of the individuals within it. To believe otherwise is to believe that some people should have special rights that others don't. Which is a rationalization for a forcibly imposed hierarchy, which isn't very sociable.
Yeah, there called doctors, cops, judges and even presidents, officers in the forces. It's called hierarchy and it's built into our genes, just like our conscience, though some are missing one of those, that's what cops and judges are for though, as you know...
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yeah, there called doctors, cops, judges and even presidents, officers in the forces. It's called hierarchy and it's built into our genes, just like our conscience, though some are missing one of those, that's what cops and judges are for though, as you know...
Except you're wrong that a group of people can have more rights than any of the individuals within it.

Rights are not additive in the sense that more people can create a right greater than any of the individuals has. If that were the case, as you seem to be weakly alluding to, a democratic gang rape, would not be a bad thing. Of course it is a bad thing and so is thinking rights can be aggregated to a higher sum than math would allow.

Cops and judges role is to maintain the hierarchy and to create revenue for the state via stolen money.

Presidents are actors, used as useful idiots by people with lots of money. Sometimes they get out of line, then they get offed.

I suspect you have above average intelligence, but are frustrated by those with greater intelligence, hence your conflation and intrepidation of being outwitted by an internet bigfoot.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I don't even know how to project narcissistic sociopath. That's all you, Gomer.

You lost the ability to call anybody dishonest after you started gushing women's rights in order curry favor with Venus. Yet there you stand, an unrepentant lying, cheating pimp who beat and brutalized a woman then put her out to whore for you. To cap it off, you took her money when you didn't even need it. You really ought to apologize and give that woman her money back.
You do it naturally.

Moving on, attacking me personally just screams that you have no arguments on the merits.

You've been hyperventilating like this for months now and it just makes you look vapid and out of ideas.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Cool meme, bro. Useless, but it illustrates your condescending mindset quite well- but that's where you run into trouble.

Clinton was the 'safe' and 'electable' choice. So was Al Gore. So was Walter Mondale. So was John Kerry. You sense a trend developing here? I'll connect the dots:

Each of them was vetted and approved by the rich elite donor class as being comfortable in line with their interests, even if those interests didn't match the needs of the majority of Americans.

Biden is just the latest in a long line of center right Democratic party charlatans who care more about pleasing their 1%er donors than their constituents.

The same goes for everyone running for President this year except for Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders. Elizabeth Warren is compromised.

Attempting to shame people into 'voting blue, no matter who' just fucking screams 'we have no ideas and we don't give a shit about our constituents' and it won't work, any more than it did for Clinton in 2016.

If you're a multimillionaire then it makes sense to vote for a corporatist. The other 98% of Americans? Not so much.

And you aren't a multimillionaire.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Cool meme, bro. Useless, but it illustrates your condescending mindset quite well- but that's where you run into trouble.

Clinton was the 'safe' and 'electable' choice. So was Al Gore. So was Walter Mondale. So was John Kerry. You sense a trend developing here? I'll connect the dots:

Each of them was vetted and approved by the rich elite donor class as being comfortable in line with their interests, even if those interests didn't match the needs of the majority of Americans.

Biden is just the latest in a long line of center right Democratic party charlatans who care more about pleasing their 1%er donors than their constituents.

The same goes for everyone running for President this year except for Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders. Elizabeth Warren is compromised.

Attempting to shame people into 'voting blue, no matter who' just fucking screams 'we have no ideas and we don't give a shit about our constituents' and it won't work, any more than it did for Clinton in 2016.

If you're a multimillionaire then it makes sense to vote for a corporatist. The other 98% of Americans? Not so much.

And you aren't a multimillionaire.


I put about as much time in finding this stupid meme as you did regurgitating Putin's lines.

Edit: This is not an election about moving the ball forward, this is a election about getting the ball away from the cheater who is actively asking for foreign help in getting him re-elected.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You do it naturally.

Moving on, attacking me personally just screams that you have no arguments on the merits.

You've been hyperventilating like this for months now and it just makes you look vapid and out of ideas.
I didn't attack you personally. I pointed out that your argument is invalid due to the hypocrisy under which you make it.

I'd be OK with your past if you had shown any remorse and willingness to make reparations but instead you deny and attack people who tell you to your face that it's up to you to earn a place back among people. You are just a phony person who cares only about your fake self image. be better.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Nice conflation, almost smart person. I'm not arguing whether people are social or not. Some are and some are not.

I'm saying that a group of people cannot have greater rights than any of the individuals within it. To believe otherwise is to believe that some people should have special rights that others don't. Which is a rationalization for a forcibly imposed hierarchy, which isn't very sociable.
Bullshit.

Quarantine for disease.

Try again.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ah, so dehumanization of 'others' is fine with you, as long as you get to define the terms.

You're such a hypocritical hack.
Says the person whose greatest desire is to lock women in cages.

You are the worst person to try to argue from moral high ground.

The best thing you could do for yourself and those close to you is to start making amends with the people you've hurt beginning with your own daughter.
 
Top