In 2020. America will not get BERNED again

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The new DNC rules state that a candidate must "be a bona fide Democrat whose record of public service, accomplishment, public writings, and/or public statements affirmatively demonstrates that the candidate is faithful to the interests, welfare, and success of the Democratic Party of the United States who subscribes to the substance, intent, and principles of the Charter and the Bylaws of the Democratic Party of the United States, and who will participate in the Convention in good faith."

And candidates must affirm in writing to the DNC chairman that they "are a Democrat... are a member of the Democratic Party; will accept the Democratic nomination; and will run and serve as a member of the Democratic Party."
This is where berniebots cry about how awful it it that Democrats only want Democrats to represent Democratic Party in the fall election.

Every elected leader of the so-called Progressive left have run as Democrats, were elected by Democrats and work with other elected Democrats to fulfill promises they made to their supporters. They couldn't get anything done otherwise because they are so few. The Progressive Left IS a wing of the Democratic Party. Sanders couldn't do his job without help from the Democratic Party. Yet the bernie bros have bought into somebody's propaganda that Democrats are the reason Republicans are fucking this country over.

I should be surprised but I'm not. Something is wrong with berniebros. @ttystikk @schuylaar @Padawanbater2
 

92x7000/5150

Well-Known Member
When you think about the possibilities.
Bernie Sanders is the ultimate Russian candidate.
He splits the votes in the Democrats, then his infrastructure is used to act as a propaganda organ against the succesful Democratic nominee
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Why should the Democratic Party allow people who aren't Democrats to participate in deciding who candidate from Democratic Party will be?
ummmmmmm, because it's in the rules?

you just outed yourself as another pompous ass who doesn't read- and looks stupid as hell.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The new DNC rules state that a candidate must "be a bona fide Democrat whose record of public service, accomplishment, public writings, and/or public statements affirmatively demonstrates that the candidate is faithful to the interests, welfare, and success of the Democratic Party of the United States who subscribes to the substance, intent, and principles of the Charter and the Bylaws of the Democratic Party of the United States, and who will participate in the Convention in good faith."


And candidates must affirm in writing to the DNC chairman that they "are a Democrat... are a member of the Democratic Party; will accept the Democratic nomination; and will run and serve as a member of the Democratic Party."

So he's two faced. We all knew that already.
that shows how stupid the both of you are..voter suppression by the states 'rolling IP'.

please don't ask what the metaphor for 'rolling IP' means- step outside your lizard brain and think men.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
You willingly or unknowingly work to get Trump elected.
Disgusting
The word you were looking for is: Unwittingly.

You see, she's so stupid she doesn't in fact realize she's being had. Her, like others, are completely ignorant but they THINK they're smart.

There is nothing more dangerous than ignorance in action.
 

92x7000/5150

Well-Known Member
The word you were looking for is: Unwittingly.

You see, she's so stupid she doesn't in fact realize she's being had. Her, like others, are completely ignorant but they THINK they're smart.

There is nothing more dangerous than ignorance in action.
Thesaurus accepts both
And I don't believe she has any "wits"
So the use of unwittingly would be redundant
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
The word you were looking for is: Unwittingly.

You see, she's so stupid she doesn't in fact realize she's being had. Her, like others, are completely ignorant but they THINK they're smart.

There is nothing more dangerous than ignorance in action.
Thesaurus accepts both
And I don't believe she has any "wits"
So the use of unwittingly would be redundant
I agree. She is clueless.

But Tty is a different sort. How many times have we heard him talk about how Trump is the best thing for the country because it will finally get people into the streets and motivate them into violence? This guy is a real piece of work - I am not throwing the comparison with Manson around lightly. For fuck's sake, he wants people to firebomb people's homes!

I can only imagine what sort of sick fantasies the piece of shit has. Tty needs people like her to make him feel good about himself.
 

92x7000/5150

Well-Known Member
I agree. She is clueless.

But Tty is a different sort. How many times have we heard him talk about how Trump is the best thing for the country because it will finally get people into the streets and motivate them into violence? This guy is a real piece of work - I am not throwing the comparison with Manson around lightly. For fuck's sake, he wants people to firebomb people's homes!

I can only imagine what sort of sick fantasies the piece of shit has. Tty needs people like her to make him feel good about himself.
She is guilty of the same thing. So is padawanrapist
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
She is guilty of the same thing. So is padawanrapist
Well, @Padawanbater2 did raise a mild objection to the firebomb campaign @ttystikk suggested. He said it was "too loud. I can't condone OPEN violence".

I think it is pretty clear that his objection is tactical rather than one of principles.

@schuylaar is a garden variety egotist who follows them around because they are the last two people who make her feel special. Just look at how she reacted to that pikachiru sock of Escobar's. They had some special relationship that made her feel superior despite the fact that escobar was openly calling her an idiot. She is beyond easy to fool and needier than anybody I have ever met. This is why she burns up the PMs with any new user. She is the lowest lying fruit possible. A 60 year old raisin in the dirt.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ummmmmmm, because it's in the rules?

you just outed yourself as another pompous ass who doesn't read- and looks stupid as hell.
Yes, Democrats have been too nice in the past. I'm not sure that's going to be the case going forward.

It makes no sense that people who can't be bothered to register as Democrats participate in the selection of the party's presidential candidate in the fall. But that's the case in a lot of states.

Fat lot of good it did for the country.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Yes, Democrats have been too nice in the past. I'm not sure that's going to be the case going forward.

It makes no sense that people who can't be bothered to register as Democrats participate in the selection of the party's presidential candidate in the fall. But that's the case in a lot of states.

Fat lot of good it did for the country.
Is it just me or are they coming apart at the seams?
 
Top