Those Damned Intolerant Liberals

londonfog

Well-Known Member
i don't want to lean one way or another, but former president Obama's official title was "community organizer." I think we are now seeing the problems associated with a professional trouble maker. You don't have to dig deep to be called a racist but, right under the surface you see what the true "Neo-liberal" plan is.

1.Increase taxes and welfare budgets to make the general uneducated populous dependent on the government for all aspects of life starting with education then healthcare and housing, calling government the "neutral compassionate" party. Blaming the other party and business for anti-progress, insuring fear votes.

2.Remove government benefits to show that populous will suffer without government assistance, blaming the other party and private business for the problems of society.

3.Use previous two actions whenever necessary to bolster over all government spending, government interference, increase regulation and bureaucracy in the name of "public safety" all while sucking private business dry, through taxation until reaching unmanageable dept. until the whole rotten system collapses.

4. Start a "new revolution" where everyone who is part of the intelligencia is label a "Zionist" Jew or "radical sympathizer" placing total blame on a poor, battered, hopeless population, holding hostage an imaginary conspiracy against a corrupt state, mass graving all opposition, only to justify the true conspiracy of total state domination.

Why? To satisfy the wet dreams of a few power hungry maniacs with money. Instead of capping personal income wealth to begin with.

Thats not you are I, that's why we don't believe it can happen, but it does, all the time, since the beginning of civilization.

Keep voting into the two party system. Seems to have worked every other time in history./s
the POTUS should be a community organizer
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i don't want to lean one way or another, but former president Obama's official title was "community organizer." I think we are now seeing the problems associated with a professional trouble maker. You don't have to dig deep to be called a racist but, right under the surface you see what the true "Neo-liberal" plan is.

1.Increase taxes and welfare budgets to make the general uneducated populous dependent on the government for all aspects of life starting with education then healthcare and housing, calling government the "neutral compassionate" party. Blaming the other party and business for anti-progress, insuring fear votes.

2.Remove government benefits to show that populous will suffer without government assistance, blaming the other party and private business for the problems of society.

3.Use previous two actions whenever necessary to bolster over all government spending, government interference, increase regulation and bureaucracy in the name of "public safety" all while sucking private business dry, through taxation until reaching unmanageable dept. until the whole rotten system collapses.

4. Start a "new revolution" where everyone who is part of the intelligencia is label a "Zionist" Jew or "radical sympathizer" placing total blame on a poor, battered, hopeless population, holding hostage an imaginary conspiracy against a corrupt state, mass graving all opposition, only to justify the true conspiracy of total state domination.

Why? To satisfy the wet dreams of a few power hungry maniacs with money. Instead of capping personal income wealth to begin with.

Thats not you are I, that's why we don't believe it can happen, but it does, all the time, since the beginning of civilization.

Keep voting into the two party system. Seems to have worked every other time in history./s
you're not smart
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
i don't want to lean one way or another, but former president Obama's official title was "community organizer." I think we are now seeing the problems associated with a professional trouble maker. You don't have to dig deep to be called a racist but, right under the surface you see what the true "Neo-liberal" plan is.

1.Increase taxes and welfare budgets to make the general uneducated populous dependent on the government for all aspects of life starting with education then healthcare and housing, calling government the "neutral compassionate" party. Blaming the other party and business for anti-progress, insuring fear votes.

2.Remove government benefits to show that populous will suffer without government assistance, blaming the other party and private business for the problems of society.

3.Use previous two actions whenever necessary to bolster over all government spending, government interference, increase regulation and bureaucracy in the name of "public safety" all while sucking private business dry, through taxation until reaching unmanageable dept. until the whole rotten system collapses.

4. Start a "new revolution" where everyone who is part of the intelligencia is label a "Zionist" Jew or "radical sympathizer" placing total blame on a poor, battered, hopeless population, holding hostage an imaginary conspiracy against a corrupt state, mass graving all opposition, only to justify the true conspiracy of total state domination.

Why? To satisfy the wet dreams of a few power hungry maniacs with money. Instead of capping personal income wealth to begin with.

Thats not you are I, that's why we don't believe it can happen, but it does, all the time, since the beginning of civilization.

Keep voting into the two party system. Seems to have worked every other time in history./s
Wow, what a collection of confusing and disjointed stuff.

I would love to respond but it is much too scattered to figure out what the heck you mean to say.

Let's just do the first paragraph.

i don't want to lean one way or another, but former president Obama's official title was "community organizer." Um, yeah, ok. You seem to be perhaps hung up on titles. Maybe you should look into a little bit of what that entailed. But what point are you trying to make about that?

I think we are now seeing the problems associated with a professional trouble maker. Exactly who are you referring to? Obama? Trump? If the former, why do you think that organizing a community is making trouble? For who exactly? What trouble would that be? Exactly how did Obama make your life awful? Please be specific.

You don't have to dig deep to be called a racist but, right under the surface you see what the true "Neo-liberal" plan is. No, you certainly don't. Again with the interesting and convenient labels. Who do you get your "neo-liberal" stuff from? Breitbart? Hannity? Limbaugh? Jordan Peterson?

The rest of your post in almost laughable in its contradictions. So I gotta ask, what is the highest level of education you achieved?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Wow, what a collection of confusing and disjointed stuff.

I would love to respond but it is much too scattered to figure out what the heck you mean to say.

Let's just do the first paragraph.

i don't want to lean one way or another, but former president Obama's official title was "community organizer." Um, yeah, ok. You seem to be perhaps hung up on titles. Maybe you should look into a little bit of what that entailed. But what point are you trying to make about that?

I think we are now seeing the problems associated with a professional trouble maker. Exactly who are you referring to? Obama? Trump? If the former, why do you think that organizing a community is making trouble? For who exactly? What trouble would that be? Exactly how did Obama make your life awful? Please be specific.

You don't have to dig deep to be called a racist but, right under the surface you see what the true "Neo-liberal" plan is. No, you certainly don't. Again with the interesting and convenient labels. Who do you get your "neo-liberal" stuff from? Breitbart? Hannity? Limbaugh? Jordan Peterson?

The rest of your post in almost laughable in its contradictions. So I gotta ask, what is the highest level of education you achieved?
I was thinking the same.
 

Andrewk420

Well-Known Member
This thread is the problem with internet politics. No eye contact, no body language, no tone, etc. It's easy to devolve into being insulting when you don't have to look someone in the eye.

Plus, the irony of what I consider the traditional left (most of the people in this thread) going after the dogmatism on the right is outstanding. The traditional left is so dogmatic that you can't even have ideas that would also be considered left, just more or less than traditional left.

This thread is also a microcosm of the democratic party. It lacks leadership and everyone is running around nipping at (would be) political allies.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
This thread is the problem with internet politics. No eye contact, no body language, no tone, etc. It's easy to devolve into being insulting when you don't have to look someone in the eye.

Plus, the irony of what I consider the traditional left (most of the people in this thread) going after the dogmatism on the right is outstanding. The traditional left is so dogmatic that you can't even have ideas that would also be considered left, just more or less than traditional left.

This thread is also a microcosm of the democratic party. It lacks leadership and everyone is running around nipping at (would be) political allies.
I appreciate what you are trying to say. However, the Germanic tribes of the 5th century also lacked leadership and often fought against themselves. It was little consolation to Rome.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
How should I know. I have never stolen anything.

How’s the propaganda biz going?
He's slipping badly.

I don't understand why the site still tolerates him, he drives more people away than anyone else I've ever seen. Can't be good for site traffic numbers.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
This thread is the problem with internet politics. No eye contact, no body language, no tone, etc. It's easy to devolve into being insulting when you don't have to look someone in the eye.

Plus, the irony of what I consider the traditional left (most of the people in this thread) going after the dogmatism on the right is outstanding. The traditional left is so dogmatic that you can't even have ideas that would also be considered left, just more or less than traditional left.

This thread is also a microcosm of the democratic party. It lacks leadership and everyone is running around nipping at (would be) political allies.
I agree.

Until liberals can be honest about how their dogmatic views are self limiting, they'll keep giving right wingers opportunities to wreck our democracy.

Maybe this is how Rome foundered, too. After all, without crippling internal strife, no disorganised crowd of tribes stood a chance against them. Everyone who has actually studied the era knows that.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
pointless to address without addressing what you refer to as "social" issues first

what's the point of going to free college if you're just gonna make 80% of what the white guy with the same degree makes?
No. Ending Citizens United and Buckley v Valeo must come first, or the Corporate money train will just run everything over again and again until it gets its way.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
any real jew would probably want to save that title for the avowed nazis we have here, but since you are not a real jew you don't.

you're just a conman.
You are definitely a hater.

You wrap yourself in whatever flag is handy in the moment, but you are without any doubt whatsoever the most toxic person here and you have been for years.
 
Top