You put text into the reply that didn't show unless I clicked on the video link. I just now saw it and was planning to reply again. Your reply was convenient.
In Jon Stewart's one minute of accurate and spot on criticism, he points out Clinton's weakness in presentation without getting into psycho-analysis like thought guide guy did later on in the video. What I heard from Jon was an accurate description of Clinton's presentation style and nothing more. We are left without an explanation by Jon. What you quoted and demonstrate by posting that piece of crap is you want to accept thought guide guy's long winded narrative after Jon's 1-minute clip. Thought guide guy says: shes a shape-shifter, flip-flopper, a narcissist, power hungry ("her main reason for running for prez), not doing the hard work. I mean, you took the bait of the video then swallowed every bit of propaganda, hook, link and sinker. There was nothing in Jon's statement to justify the rest of that thought guide's content. Furthermore, Jon never said empty suit. You did.
There are many possible reasons for Clinton's stiff presentation style. That video you placed in your reply contains a sinister reason, which is she is some sort of plastic sociopath who has no moral compass. Maybe so, but to believe that takes a leap of faith without considering better alternatives. There are other more likely reasons why Clinton has poor presentation skills. One is that she is just plain bad at it. This is the simplest one and requires nobody to tell me what to think.
I enjoyed Jon's clear description of what I had already seen other times where Clinton was forced to be spontaneous. Rather than convince me of "empty suit", the rest of the video explains quite clearly to me how Sandernistas became so unreasonable and radicalized. You guys are watching propaganda that preaches to you through your bias, not through facts. Clinton is a lot of things but she doesn't match the description of narcissist - sociopath. Trump, on the other hand by observing his behavior does.
