Good guy with a gun...

I

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
78% of americans don't own a gun.

3% of americans own half the guns.

ponder.
Click to expand...
funny how the statistical group proven responsible for the overwhelming majority of gun violence is always absent from general anti firearm statistics,like the meaningless stats u posted

Hint,the answer isn't inside a meme of a hillbilly,but you'll still do your best to proclaim otherwise lol
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MrRoboto said:
Show me a study that says those 3% relate to gun violence in any way shape or form.
Click to expand...
Illinois Enema Bandit said:
funny how the statistical group proven responsible for the overwhelming majority of gun violence is always absent from general anti firearm statistics,like the meaningless stats u posted

Hint,the answer isn't inside a meme of a hillbilly,but you'll still do your best to proclaim otherwise lol
Click to expand...
why are you guys so angry all the time? white pride?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Nope. You bring your misconceptions to RIU. The narrative from the right is that moderates -- not even hard leftists -- want to take all guns away. This is repeated again and again to scare you into voting against your economic interests which makes you a tool.

Clinton is proposing an assault rifle weapons ban that would have zero effect on the ownership of guns already in your possession and would not affect most semiautomatic weapons sold in the future.

I can't speak for everybody but most that you would label "leftists", in other words anybody who isn't extremely hard right, are just saying that gun carry laws make people less safe. We question the logic of guns carried outside the home by nincompoops like the woman who was shot in the back by her child because she left a loaded hand gun lying on the car floor and the child was able to pick it up.

You look really foolish in that photo posted by Buck, by the way.
Click to expand...
More bullshit. Hillary likes the Australian solution. California Democrats are doing their best to ban and confiscate firearms with regulations that make ownership effectively impossible. Hillary wants to ban semi automatic rifles despite the fact that such weapons are almost never used in a crime.

You take a simple tragedy and use it to deny civil rights to citizens.

Most of Buck's photos look foolish. He picked a photo of a guy who symbolizes what you lefties hate: a white guy.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
More bullshit. Hillary likes the Australian solution. California Democrats are doing their best to ban and confiscate firearms with regulations that make ownership effectively impossible. Hillary wants to ban semi automatic rifles despite the fact that such weapons are almost never used in a crime.

You take a simple tragedy and use it to deny civil rights to citizens.

Most of Buck's photos look foolish. He picked a photo of a guy who symbolizes what you lefties hate: a white guy.
Click to expand...
Assuming you can read, any glance at a summary of the Assault Weapons Ban would prove you wrong. There is no serious movement to take all semiautomatic guns or rifles away from the populace. In fact even the weapons listed in the ban would be legal to keep, not taken away. Clinton will "confiscate firearms" from the population. That's so clearly a lie that it's a dumb thing to say, even for you. Maybe once Trump gets in, he will start that movement because lawn order. There are plenty of Democrats that own guns too. What you repeat is just made up shit that bozos like you repeat to each other.

You look might silly kitted out in that photo with your belly pushing out.
 
MrRoboto

MrRoboto

Well-Known Member
We all agree that it's tragic when these nuts shoot innocent people, or try to blow them up with a cook pot.

Do you really think more laws will help?

I don't. Seems mighty optimistic to think they would pay attention to a new law.

Locked houses keep good people out.

Same principle. Laws keep honest folks in check.

I don't think there is a damn thing we can do about these nuts short of banning Muslims and locking up the mentally ill. What kind of "free" country do we have then?
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Assuming you can read, any glance at a summary of the Assault Weapons Ban would prove you wrong. There is no serious movement to take all semiautomatic guns or rifles away from the populace. In fact even the weapons listed in the ban would be legal to keep, not taken away. Clinton will "confiscate firearms" from the population. That's so clearly a lie that it's a dumb thing to say, even for you. Maybe once Trump gets in, he will start that movement because lawn order. There are plenty of Democrats that own guns too. What you repeat is just made up shit that bozos like you repeat to each other.

You look might silly kitted out in that photo with your belly pushing out.
Click to expand...
What photo? You have no idea what I look like.

Hillary favors the Australia solution. That is a gun confiscation scheme.

Hillary denies that firearm ownership is an individual right, despite the Heller decision by SCOTUS, and more importantly despite the ability of ordinary citizens to read. That is laying the ground work for the confiscation.

In California laws have been passed already to confiscate "high capacity" magazines; to require a background check to purchase ammo, etc. The ammo law is meant to to make firearm ownership so difficult and expensive that it is impossible. A fundamental civil right denied to American citizens. Is there any civil right the left embraces and defends?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
What photo? You have no idea what I look like.

Hillary favors the Australia solution. That is a gun confiscation scheme.

Hillary denies that firearm ownership is an individual right, despite the Heller decision by SCOTUS, and more importantly despite the ability of ordinary citizens to read. That is laying the ground work for the confiscation.

In California laws have been passed already to confiscate "high capacity" magazines; to require a background check to purchase ammo, etc. The ammo law is meant to to make firearm ownership so difficult and expensive that it is impossible. A fundamental civil right denied to American citizens. Is there any civil right the left embraces and defends?
Click to expand...
You repeat yourself just like any idiot. Nice attempt at a diversion, ugly. Clinton isn't running for office in California. I fail to see how your complaint about a California law applies to her. I live in Oregon, so fuck you and your state.

What laws has Clinton proposed are the Australian solution? Where has she said that this is her goal? Your word is worthless, so can you provide citations? Or are you just going to sit on your ass with your big belly pushing against your gun belt and repeat yourself? Oh any shitty right wing blogs will be laughed at. Mainstream media only such as online large city newspapers, major news websites. You will be fact checked. I am skeptical but willing to read.

The only proposal that I've seen is the reinstatement of the assault weapons ban. The ban would be for specific makes and models and a few features would be banned. Also anybody owning such a weapon wouldn't be affected. The ban applies to the sale of specified guns not existing ownership. I don't support the ban but that's all she's proposing as far as I know. Also it has little chance of passing through Congress. Prove me wrong, fatty.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:


Nobody argues good people with guns can't stop crime

The argument is that everybody doesn't have to be armed to keep law and order in a civil society
Click to expand...

Nobody should be forced to be armed.

Nobody should use force or government, which is the embodiment of force, to disarm another peaceful person who is not in the act of using or threatening force.

So, would you have government initiate threats of force, and use guns to disarm people who DO want to be armed in order to protect themselves?

 

Attachments

MrRoboto

MrRoboto

Well-Known Member
Yes really. The article in Time says that these 3% own 17 or more guns. I think I would remember a trend of reporting "mofo had 17 guns".
 
testiclees

testiclees

Well-Known Member
Illinois Enema Bandit said:
funny how the statistical group proven responsible for the overwhelming majority of gun violence is always absent from general anti firearm statistics,like the meaningless stats u posted

Hint,the answer isn't inside a meme of a hillbilly,but you'll still do your best to proclaim otherwise lol
Click to expand...
How is that "lol" you're dumber than fuck and make zero sense , merit zero consideration and utter ridiculously loutish idiocy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top