meh..we shall see.
i understand all you weed breaths just can't wait to see innocent insured people miss out on money earmarked for their state because of politics.
typically state supercede's fed ie; minimum wage, but in this case the benefit is from fed therefore, i believe argument will be just that.
scotus allowed the set-up of exchanges up to the state, but to the detriment of the citizen it's supposed be protecting?
it had been said from the beginning that if state wouldn't do it, fed would..money has already been earmarked for me..pompous ass only has 3 more months to go and he's out anyway..we'll get our exchange with charlie crist!