Conservatism and cognitive ability are negatively correlated

Intelligence.
:)
IMO most left/right party militants are less intelligent as a result of being blinded by partisan rhetoric and rivalry.
 
abandonconflict said:
How dare you denounce our lord and messiah L. Rawn Pawl Hubbard?
Click to expand...

tell us again who the libertarian candidate was in the last election genius?

You are not doing well putting down people itt while haveing your head up your ass. May I recommend a glass belly-button so you can see where you are going.
 
UncleBuck said:
so rawn pawl ceased to be a libertarian in 2008 then?

was he somehow socially liberal in 2008?
Click to expand...

Here comes the liberal two-step. You quoted me saying "I never voted for the LIBERTARIAN candidate", then showed quotes that I voted for Ron Paul in 2008, then you called me a liar.

Now, you're trying to squirm your way out of your stupidity. You had NO FUCKING IDEA that he wasn't the Libertarian candidate when you tried to jump up in my shit. EVERYONE in here knows it, regardless of what bullshit you try to spew now.

Apologize or be doomed to seeing this from now to eternity...and you might be able to save some honor.
 
muyloco is so "socially liberal" that he voted for the "libertarian" who got the endorsement from white supremacist group stormfront in 2008.

Screenshot2014-05-09at50426PM_zps4a5c2255.png
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Here comes the liberal two-step. You quoted me saying "I never voted for the LIBERTARIAN candidate", then showed quotes that I voted for Ron Paul in 2008, then you called me a liar.

Now, you're trying to squirm your way out of your stupidity. You had NO FUCKING IDEA that he wasn't the Libertarian candidate when you tried to jump up in my shit. EVERYONE in here knows it, regardless of what bullshit you try to spew now.

Apologize or be doomed to seeing this from now to eternity...and you might be able to save some honor.
Click to expand...

so rawn pawl denounced libertarianism in 2008?

was rawn pawl being socially liberal when he was getting endorsed by the white supremacists at stormfront?

was he being anti-theist when he touted the endorsement of "kill the gays" reverends?

i fail to see how this works in your favor in any way. is this kind of like the 14 point romney lead (that prominent social loberal and anti-theist) that you were so happy with?

you are a deluded, sad little person.
 
You love to dwell on the details. Go back and check your post. See those highlighted sentences that led to a claim of me being a liar? Did I lie? Yes or no?

And for the record, I said I was an anti-theist. I never said anything about anyone else being one.

Apologize like a fucking man.
 
ginwilly said:
tell us again who the libertarian candidate was in the last election genius?

You are not doing well putting down people itt while haveing your head up your ass. May I recommend a glass belly-button so you can see where you are going.
Click to expand...

UncleBuck was the one arguing with muypoco there dipshit.
 
ginwilly said:
tell us again who the libertarian candidate was in the last election genius?

You are not doing well putting down people itt while haveing your head up your ass. May I recommend a glass belly-button so you can see where you are going.
Click to expand...

tell us again how you oppose civil rights but you are not a racist.
 
abandonconflict said:
Literate, maybe a few; proficient, not a single one.
Click to expand...
Heard of the scientist Michael Sherman?

One thing you'll notice about scientists is they generally try to leave bias off the table. Analyze data and form a conclusion, what liberals and conservatives do is form and conclusion and search for data to confirm that bias. You know, like psychological studies done with government money by liberals to show a conclusion they already "knew".

Science Is Libertarian
Here's a different take than your beliefs if you care to be openminded.
 
abandonconflict said:
UncleBuck was the one arguing with muypoco there dipshit.
Click to expand...

Oh sorry man, when you so eloquently and intelligently added to the conversation about voting libertarian and muy said he didn't, you said something about the lord Paul. I thought that was you... oh wait it was, now what the fuck are you talking about again?
 
ginwilly said:
Oh sorry man, when you so eloquently and intelligently added to the conversation about voting libertarian and muy said he didn't, you said something about the lord Paul. I thought that was you... oh wait it was, now what the fuck are you talking about again?
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about anyone voting libertarian today.

ginwilly said:
Science Is
Is Libertarian.
Click to expand...

Actually, when libertarians fund "science" it is almost always climate change denial.
 
abandonconflict said:
I didn't say anything about anyone voting libertarian today.



Actually, when libertarians fund "science" it is almost always climate change denial.
Click to expand...

When politics fund science it's almost always biased is more true. If a libertarian is funding studies on climate change then I doubt they are truly libertarian, doesn't compute. What I was pointing out was that scientists who claim no political affiliation generally adhere to libertarian principles. Funding any studies for political reasons goes against the grain of libertarian thought, does that make sense?

You can keep making generalizations about people you obviously know nothing about though if that's your thing.

BTW, that was a link, not sure if it's showing up on your browser, it doesn't look like a link on waterfox.

And whatever about RP and your smarky remark, let's move on from that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top