ben carson is a product of welfare and affirmative action that you hate so much.
You are wrong about what I think. As usual.
I do hate race-based affirmative action. I have no problem with financial aid for kids who grew up in poverty. I have no problem with extra help for kids who grew up in poverty. The problem with affirmative action as currently practiced is that it is just a racial spoils program and just as reprehensible as Jim Crow. Current affirmative action practices favors upper class black kids, because of the melanin in their skin, over impoverished white kids because of their relative lack of melanin. Let's not even consider the sort of discrimination that is practiced against Asians. The fact that you are such an ardent supporter of affirmative action is why I have concluded that you are the worst sort of racist. One hundred years ago, you would have been the one throwing the rope over the tree limb and gleefully hanging some poor black guy.
I don't hate welfare. I do hate what welfare has done to poor people. The nuclear family has virtually ceased to exist in the black community because of welfare. Befoer about 1960 or so, black nuclear families were the norm. Since the great society programs, the black nuclear family has nearly disappeared. Welfare has been hijacked by progressives because it has allowed the prog elites to control the votes in poor communities. Progressives don't give two shits about the black community, they only want the power, prestige and money that comes from that reliable voting block. That progressive elites have managed to instill a sense of guilt and shame into a significant portion of white voters, like you, who don't know the first thing about the black community or it seems about human nature in general is a wonderment to me. Welfare should not be structured so as to destroy families by driving fathers from the household. Welfare should not be structured so as to make grown people perpetual wards of the state.
Here is Ben Carson talking about the sort of affirmative action that I support:
The real question is this: Who should receive extra consideration from a nation that has a tradition of cheering for the underdog? My answer to that question may surprise many, but I don't believe race determines underdog status today. Rather, it is the circumstances of one's life that should be considered.
For example, let's take a child who is a member of a racial minority with parents who are successful professionals who have given their child every imaginable advantage. The child applies to a prestigious university with a 3.95 grade-point average, excellent SAT scores and a great record of community service. This child would obviously be an excellent candidate for admission.
Let's take another child who is white, but whose father is incarcerated and whose mother is an alcoholic. Despite these disadvantages, the child still has a 3.7 grade-point average, very good SAT scores and a resume that includes several low-paying jobs. Without taking any other factors into consideration, the choice is clear: The first student would be admitted over the second.
However, I think extra consideration should go to the second child, who has clearly demonstrated the tenacity and determination to succeed in the face of daunting odds. If that second child happens to be a member of a racial minority, obviously he would receive the extra consideration, as well.
I call this "compassionate action." Such a strategy demonstrates sensitivity and compassion, as well as recognition of substantial achievement in the face of difficult obstacles. The groups who benefit from compassionate action will probably change over time, depending on which ones have the greatest number of obstacles to overcome. The point is, it's time to be more concerned about the content of character than the color of skin when extending extra consideration.
http://townhall.com/columnists/drbencarson/2014/02/19/beyond-affirmative-action-n1796992/page/full
After reading Dr. Carson's article, I have to conclude he knows a great deal more about human nature and fairness than you ever will. But please don't let this simple response deter you from calling me names. That is, after all, the only thing you have to offer in the discussion.