10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Don't Understand

joe macclennan

Well-Known Member
lol...so you guys started a group to get away from bucky?

that is kinda funny. I like most of the members in your group but don't want to be invited. I am more than capable of talking in the open.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member




i wonder if this would offend black or hispanic people.
Since it is true, it does not matter.

Oh I know, you will say it isn't true. You'll point to poverty. But the best indicator of if someone is poor is if they are black or Hispanic. Poor whites commit more crime than wealthy whites, but poor minorities commit more crime than poor whites. So it isn't obviously just money.

Don't believe poor minorities commit more crime, just look at prison demographics.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
inb4 is all I can say at this mental retardation and why its perpetuated, recognizing of course this well thought out and completely polite post IS perpetuating it.

Jesus Christ just look at the tags.....and tell me I am a hateful bigot once again for the lolz:

Add / Edit Tags sirgreendumb secedes, twostroke's fat gf, uncle buck baby fucker, unclebuck has no friends



of course, you could just re-post the 'pooeypopsicle' vid that you took down and show us how chunky or non-chunky she is.
 

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
you and kynes have made this claim many, many times and have NEVER cited it.
You know the following fact to be a fact; prison populations are such that therein whites are a minority.

Given that whites are a majority in free society, the fact appears to be self evident.

The prison population isn't close to the rest of society, it is terribly terribly lopsided, more than making up for any remaining bias in our judicial system.
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member




i wonder if this would offend black or hispanic people.
If they are as blind to statistics as you are I would think so....
lol...so you guys started a group to get away from bucky?

that is kinda funny. I like most of the members in your group but don't want to be invited. I am more than capable of talking in the open.
No, were still here, but the group was made for the simple fact of staying on topic without being called names for having a difference of opinion. The pure irony of it is you can still see everything we write and get to watch the crying butthurt take place here. :grin:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You know the following fact to be a fact; prison populations are such that therein whites are a minority.

Given that whites are a majority in free society, the fact appears to be self evident.

The prison population isn't close to the rest of society, it is terribly terribly lopsided, more than making up for any remaining bias in our judicial system.
still no citation. not surprising.

If they are as blind to statistics as you are I would think so....
there are no statistics to prove that, only "findings" from a white supremacy group.

While there is a correlation between blacks and Hispanics and crime, the data implies a stronger tie between poverty and crime than crime and any racial group, when gender is taken into consideration.[SUP][39][/SUP] The direct correlation between crime and class, when factoring for race alone, is relatively weak. When gender, and familial history are factored, class correlates more strongly with crime than race or ethnicity.[SUP][40][/SUP][SUP][41][/SUP] Studies indicate that areas with low socioeconomic status may have the greatest correlation of crime with young and adult males, regardless of racial composition, though its effect on females is negligible.[SUP][40][/SUP][SUP][41][/SUP]
 

joe macclennan

Well-Known Member
The pure irony of it is you can still see everything we write and get to watch the crying butthurt take place here. :grin:
oh I see what you are doing. The real irony is that there are that many of you and you can't hold your own against one guy.....That's funny shit right there.

You know I like you green thumb and have nothing against you personally but to go into your "private" group and bitch about another member and regroup to make your assault on bucky in the public forum is just childish and very amusing imo.

I understand your reasoning....but it's still funny.


carry on
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
of course, you could just re-post the 'pooeypopsicle' vid that you took down and show us how chunky or non-chunky she is.
I could post sex vids of my ACTUAL gf if I had taken any....but you're already getting stalker boners off something totally unrelated, fictional and fanatical.
Just because you chose to post pics of YOU AND YOUR girl, which as I read is some subject of ridicule for you here, does not mean I will or wish to.

Your girl is like a 9.5 btw you give great hope to those losing their hair that are not quite as tall as 3 lasco box fans.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Every point in the OP is why I despise liberals. I'm adding point 11. "A liberal will find fault in one point to discredit other points and argue the other points they agree with as if devil's advocate." Then when you point out what they did, the liberal will say because of the point they disagree with, you're not allowed to agree on the what they agree on. An example is how I told people I'm Buddhist. I get either I don't know what Buddhism is about, or America isn't Buddhist, or Buddhism is bullshit. But if a liberal said they were, the other liberals would embrace me as diversity.
I don't despise them...you may be the rare animal that was not ONCE them, I will concede that.

I can't figure out why they did not get their own party and choose to wear the DEM label though....then proceed to sling mud at all that is DEM simply switching the label to REP.

like no-one took psyc or history.
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
oh I see what you are doing. The real irony is that there are that many of you and you can't hold your own against one guy.....That's funny shit right there.

You know I like you green thumb and have nothing against you personally but to go into your "private" group and bitch about another member and regroup to make your assault on bucky in the public forum is just childish and very amusing imo.

I understand your reasoning....but it's still funny.


carry on
You're completely misunderstanding why I made the group. It isn't to go and talk about buck and regroup and laugh at him all butthurt(that is a bonus) I made it to talk to people about politics and other shit without being interrupted by someone calling you a racist or whatever keyphrase happens to be for that day. All the members I have invited that has joined have still been talking right here in this section. As it stands right now its just a bunch of bullshit and I cant even be certain that it will hold up since most like to get a rise in this section. I made it as a place to go without having to deal with nonsense.

I'm sure there will be some days that a person just doesn't feel like dealing with stupid name calling, but still wants to debate.

There is nothing childish about what I did, or what I have done. I simply gave some other member a place to talk without being interrupted or have the discussion derailed.

But the bonus is hilarious.
To me at least.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
I don't despise them...you may be the rare animal that was not ONCE them, I will concede that.

I can't figure out why they did not get their own party and choose to wear the DEM label though....then proceed to sling mud at all that is DEM simply switching the label to REP.

like no-one took psyc or history.
You can pour your heart and they don't give a fuck. But we're the selfish ones for thinking family first, and that scares them. It's forcing a family without abortion. Yet where's our charity!
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
You can pour your heart and they don't give a fuck. But we're the selfish ones for thinking family first, and that scares them. It's forcing a family without abortion. Yet where's our charity!
It seems separating the father was common practice on the old Plantations. It seems to apply to this new liberal plantation as well.
Who is your daddy?
Unless we can conclude progressive "benefits" are greater for married mothers(common law included), that is.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
It seems separating the father was common practice on the old Plantations. It seems to apply to this new liberal plantation as well.
Who is your daddy?
Unless we can conclude progressive "benefits" are greater for married mothers(common law included), that is.
Corp is mother, corp is father.
 
Top