twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
You know all the labels you apply to everyone here plus two zinc quarters could get you a nice cold 12oz Coke.
Feds Charge White Man With Hate Crime In First Knockout Game Prosecution
- Thread starter beenthere
- Start date
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Every single Republican from moderate to extreme has NEVER called me a Republican once they know my views. Buck is the only one smart enough to figure out my true feelings.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you're not anti-authoritarianism. i thought so.
veganism, cannabis use, and atheism are not incompatible with being a right wing american.
neither is long hair.
you are pro gun, anti abortion, and reflexively cringe at the very notion of taxation and regulation (as we saw last night).
you even had a "vote 4 romney" sig last year and a(n epic) breakdown after obama's landslide in the electoral college.
your libertarianism is confined to right wing libertarian stances, and abandon the left and center libertarians on abortion as predicted of a right winger.
don't be afraid, just call yourself a republican. that is what you are now.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Libertarian technocrat......nice.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
basically a neo liberal but who hates the military and abortions.
One of the most significant problems with our political system is that pesky desire to fit every person into one of two relatively meaningless labels.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Would the constitution be considered authoritarianism? And if so then on whom?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Why do you feel the need to define that?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Yeah. I hate how we can vote in dumb shits who think they invented the internet, just because they were one of the first ones they think used the term. Even though they had nothing to do with it.
My belief is only people who are qualified can make decisions, not someone who can redefine the word "is" or says God forgives him for being a past sinner.
Otherwise we'll end up like this:
Dr. Strangelove said:
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Even if he was correct about my being a neo-liberal, they're not anything close to a right winger either.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'm not defining libertarian technocrat, i am describing canna's approximate placement with the realm of actual definitions that are meaningful and which people use.
basically, he's a republican who hates the military.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the constitution grants authority to lots of people and institutions. congress, the president, states, people...yadda yadda yadda.
nice try at advancing a false right wing talking point though!
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
And their love of God, support of corporations, hatred of different life styles (you know the whole "Only steers and queers come from Texas, Private Cowboy, and you don't look much like a steer to me, so that kinda narrows it down. Do you suck dicks?") and their indoctrination methods.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Just scored a nice daewoo k1a1.......do liberals wish I did not have this? Are they mad that I would never commit a mass shooting with it ?
Are they mad their moms only buy them pussy guns to commit mass shootings with and jealous the right has all those cool guns and don't use them to commit those kinds of awful atrocities?
Are they mad their moms only buy them pussy guns to commit mass shootings with and jealous the right has all those cool guns and don't use them to commit those kinds of awful atrocities?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I only have your word on that. So let's do a simple test. Were you ever in the Marines and do you have fantasies about observation towers?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
No sir I am not and do not.
see4
Well-Known Member
Awww, you jealous? You want me to be on your team? I'm the best kickballer around!
And just to note, UB and I used to troll each other years ago. It's just that we agree, as most do here, that you are a total fucking moron and deserve to be trolled. Just because we gang up on you does not mean neither one of us are "suckasses".
But if you want, I can be your friend too. I could be a real good friend to you.
[video=youtube;7jKCa54blg8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jKCa54blg8[/video]
see4
Well-Known Member
Then why do I feel you and I are on opposite sides of the spectrum? Sans the long hair and vegan part, I'm sort of there with ya. Maybe it's our approach to things?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Because you want to do your agenda through force and believe your overlords' bullshit. Global alarmists for instance want regulations which make them rich and do what benefits not us. You have pity for those who sneak in and can and do harm us by circumventing rules citizens must follow such as a law record and credit report. Pretty much criminals go around your do gooder prevention, while those like me with morals get incovienced and fucked when we follow the rules you want.
see4
Well-Known Member
You are sadly mistaken and have completely misunderstood what I stand for. So lets go over your points together, shall we?
Ok, I have no agenda, I am actually not that affected by government policy, I make enough money for it to not really matter to me and my lifestyle. As a side note, I voted for Bush, first term. Just so you know where I stand.
Global alarmists? Nah, I don't buy the hype they bring. But I do believe we are doing more harm than good. And why not try new forms of energy? Solar and wind? Why would you NOT want to invest in that? It's proven to be effective.
I pity nobody that illegally enters this country. However, depending on the circumstances of their entry, I would consider some sort of work program that makes the illegal entrants work hard for their citizenship. For those scumbags who enter the country illegally and are up to no good, I say shoot them in the dick and send them packing.
I'm a humanist, but I do have a limit.
But once again, you have been sold on what beenthere and others have pictured me, you never followed up with the source, you just assumed. Don't do that.