twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
You know all the labels you apply to everyone here plus two zinc quarters could get you a nice cold 12oz Coke.that's true, except when you examine the issues.
You know all the labels you apply to everyone here plus two zinc quarters could get you a nice cold 12oz Coke.that's true, except when you examine the issues.
Every single Republican from moderate to extreme has NEVER called me a Republican once they know my views. Buck is the only one smart enough to figure out my true feelings.You know all the labels you apply to everyone here plus two zinc quarters could get you a nice cold 12oz Coke.
so you're not anti-authoritarianism. i thought so.How do you ban theft, murder and rape without some some authoritarianism involved? Are you seriously that stupid?
basically a neo liberal but who hates the military and abortions.Libertarian technocrat......nice.
One of the most significant problems with our political system is that pesky desire to fit every person into one of two relatively meaningless labels.don't be afraid, just call yourself a republican. that is what you are now.
Why do you feel the need to define that?basically a neo liberal but who hates the military and abortions.
Yeah. I hate how we can vote in dumb shits who think they invented the internet, just because they were one of the first ones they think used the term. Even though they had nothing to do with it.Libertarian technocrat......nice.
Dr. Strangelove said:President Merkin Muffley: General Turgidson! When you instituted the human reliability tests, you *assured* me there was *no* possibility of such a thing *ever* occurring!
General "Buck" Turgidson: Well, I, uh, don't think it's quite fair to condemn a whole program because of a single slip-up, sir.
Even if he was correct about my being a neo-liberal, they're not anything close to a right winger either.Why do you feel the need to define that?
i'm not defining libertarian technocrat, i am describing canna's approximate placement with the realm of actual definitions that are meaningful and which people use.Why do you feel the need to define that?
the constitution grants authority to lots of people and institutions. congress, the president, states, people...yadda yadda yadda.Would the constitution be considered authoritarianism? And if so then on whom?
And their love of God, support of corporations, hatred of different life styles (you know the whole "Only steers and queers come from Texas, Private Cowboy, and you don't look much like a steer to me, so that kinda narrows it down. Do you suck dicks?") and their indoctrination methods.i'm not defining libertarian technocrat, i am describing canna's approximate placement with the realm of actual definitions that are meaningful and which people use.
basically, he's a republican who hates the military.
I only have your word on that. So let's do a simple test. Were you ever in the Marines and do you have fantasies about observation towers?Just scored a nice daewoo k1a1.......do liberals wish I did not have this? Are they mad that I would never commit a mass shooting with it ?
Are they mad their moms only buy them pussy guns to commit mass shootings with?
Awww, you jealous? You want me to be on your team? I'm the best kickballer around!Dude, could you imagine if see4 was real, how embarrassing it would be, to be such a Bucky suckass?
Then why do I feel you and I are on opposite sides of the spectrum? Sans the long hair and vegan part, I'm sort of there with ya. Maybe it's our approach to things?Let's see.
Smoke pot.
Vegan.
Atheist.
Libertarian technocrat.
Peacenik hippy with hair longer than Jesus. (Fuck war!)
Anti-corporation.
Anti-authoritarian.
Yep, you got me bro, I'm a fuckin' right winger!
Because you want to do your agenda through force and believe your overlords' bullshit. Global alarmists for instance want regulations which make them rich and do what benefits not us. You have pity for those who sneak in and can and do harm us by circumventing rules citizens must follow such as a law record and credit report. Pretty much criminals go around your do gooder prevention, while those like me with morals get incovienced and fucked when we follow the rules you want.Then why do I feel you and I are on opposite sides of the spectrum? Sans the long hair and vegan part, I'm sort of there with ya. Maybe it's our approach to things?
You are sadly mistaken and have completely misunderstood what I stand for. So lets go over your points together, shall we?Because you want to do your agenda through force and believe your overlords' bullshit. Global alarmists for instance want regulations which make them rich and do what benefits not us. You have pity for those who sneak in and can and do harm us by circumventing rules citizens must follow such as a law record and credit report. Pretty much criminals go around your do gooder prevention, while those like me with morals get incovienced and fucked when we follow the rules you want.