Will You Take The Vaccine?

Are you going to take the corona virus vaccine?

  • No.

  • Yes.

Results are only viewable after voting.
captainmorgan

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
PJ Diaz said:
www.click2houston.com

Local teen diagnosed with Guillain-Barre syndrome questions COVID-19 vaccine after receiving first dose

Wyatt McGlaun, a teenager in The Woodlands, said he got Guillan-Barre syndrome a few weeks after his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.
www.click2houston.com www.click2houston.com

View attachment 4876484



THE WOODLANDS, Texas – Wyatt McGlaun, a teenager in The Woodlands, said he got Guillan-Barre syndrome a few weeks after his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

“I wanted to get the vaccine. I felt it was the right thing to do,” McGlaun said. “I wanted to travel and enjoy my last summer before college.”

However, he said, he got extremely weak and had difficulty walking when he was admitted to CHI St. Luke’s in The Woodlands where he was diagnosed.

“I just knew something didn’t feel right. It wasn’t getting any better,” Wyatt explained.
...
Click to expand...
What about the over 3,200 children that have gotten MISC from covid, and over 30 of them have died?
 
M

mooray

Well-Known Member
HaroldRocks said:
i am posting genuinely

i dont know what else to say to try to convince anybody
Click to expand...
Well, it's easy for you to get lumped in with PJ Diaz in this thread because you're on the same "side" and I think you've only done it a couple times, but he's posted silly articles where it either looks simply like an unfortunate anomaly, or the source is ridiculous. Like we talked about, 90% reduction in severity of symptoms, so that means 10% could still see severe symptoms, so posting about the 10% without painting the bigger picture comes off as bogus.

To me, the only honest opposing approach would be, "I realize the likelihood is very low and my concern may be irrational, but I'm not comfortable just yet". But the spotty, "hey look at this guy" thing where everything posted is purely in opposition and there's no acknowledgment of the flip side, which is that you'd very likely be fine, is painting an incomplete picture and an incomplete picture appears manipulative, and manipulative is something they've seen a thousand times. And nobody here is denying the 10%.

All imo of course.
 
Last edited:
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Dorian2 said:
No tubes in that diagram heh heh. It's just the schematic for the Boss MT-2 pedal. A lot of guitar amps are still tube based so they're still fairly available. Manufacturing is the shits compared to the old school ones though. But I digress....when this came out as the so called 5G chip they were implanting into people via the vaccine, it kinda pissed me off. Many people without any type of electronics background will fall for things they don't quite understand fully. Piss's me off that there are people out there spreading nonsense like that. It's insulting to peoples intelligence to say the least.
Click to expand...
I imagine that's why they chose such a ridiculous schematic, when the fools posted it on social media they would be roasted unmercifully. Some folks know a vacuum tube schematic when they see one, at least us old farts! An early project of mine was a 3 tube vacuum tube amp with one of them tubes a rectifier! Made from salvaged tube radios, NO PCB, chaises construction!
 
HaroldRocks

HaroldRocks

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Proving a negative is difficult, but in this case not impossible, the viral genetic etiology has been followed back to bats, it came from nature, just like all the other pandemics that jumped species. AIDS came for eating and preparing monkey bushmeat in Africa, or perhaps some deviant fucking monkeys! They promoted conspiracy theories about that too, just like you are doing here. See the issue here really isn't your choice to be immunized, it's your promoting disinformation and conspiracy theories. Make your arguments with facts, honest mistakes are ok, but not malicious lying that puts folks lives at risk for no good purpose.

Most people here really don't care if you are vaccinated or not, or won't in a few months, when they and their families are fully protected. They will be perfectly willing to let you die, get sick, or fucked for life and not lose a wink of sleep over it.
Click to expand...

Yea but i didn't say it was CREATED in the lab....i think they were probably playing around with a bat virus at the lab
 
HaroldRocks

HaroldRocks

Well-Known Member
mooray said:
Well, it's easy for you to get lumped in with PJ Diaz in this thread because you're on the same "side" and I think you've only done it a couple times, but he's posted silly articles where it either looks simply like an unfortunate anomaly, or the source is ridiculous. Like we talked about, 90% reduction in severity of symptoms, so that means 10% could still see severe symptoms, so posting about the 10% without painting the bigger picture comes off as bogus.

To me, the only honest opposing approach would be, "I realize the likelihood is very low and my concern may be irrational, but I'm not comfortable just yet". But the spotty, "hey look at this guy" thing where everything posted is purely in opposition and there's no acknowledgment of the flip side, which is that you'd very likely be fine, is painting an incomplete picture and an incomplete picture appears manipulative, and manipulative is something they've seen a thousand times. And nobody here is denying the 10%.

All imo of course.
Click to expand...

yea but i dont think it is irrational, so why would i say that?

when i posted VAERS reporting, that's not false or even questionable, it's straight up fact
 
M

mooray

Well-Known Member
Yeah that's true, some people do have different risk tolerances. Like the article you posted where some people were feeling shitty out of thousands from the J&J, that's fine by me. Nobody died and the result was actually 100% with no serious issues, *to me*, but to some people feeling chills and nausea is serious. I call them pussies, but again, that's just my perception.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
HaroldRocks said:
Yea but i didn't say it was CREATED in the lab....i think they were probably playing around with a bat virus at the lab
Click to expand...
I didn't say you did, and Redfield didn't imply it was created either, but the origin scenario is consistent with what happens in these circumstances. The line is it was a wild virus the "escaped from a virology lab" and is most likely untrue, a more plausible explanation is a wild food market, some Chinese people eat these things and most demand the animal is killed in their presence. This is where almost all new virus come from like the suspected coronavirus pandemic in the late 19th century one of several viruses that gives us today's common cold, same for the first SARS covid virus that they stopped a decade ago, covid19 is now officially named SARS- CoV-2.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
From a trusted source of information:

People who have previously had Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS)
People who have previously had GBS may receive a COVID-19 vaccine. To date, no cases of GBS have been reported following vaccination in participants in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. One case of GBS was reported in a vaccinated participant in the Johnson & Johnson Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine clinical trial (compared to one GBS case among those who received placebo). With few exceptions, the independent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) general best practice guidelines for immunization do not include a history of GBS as a precaution to vaccination with other vaccines.

www.cdc.gov

COVID-19 Vaccination Considerations for Persons with Underlying Medica

If you have an underlying medical condition, this can help you make an informed decision about getting a COVID-19 vaccination.
www.cdc.gov www.cdc.gov
 
HaroldRocks

HaroldRocks

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
My doctor taught his receptionist how to shoot an x-ray in 3 minutes when their x-ray "technician" was at lunch.
Click to expand...

yea you can probably do it too, even with your limited skill set - but you gotta get the license and an associate's degree to be paid for it without being supervised by a doctor - im not sure you can handle the book work and the test with that peanut in your skull
 
knucklehead bob

knucklehead bob

Well-Known Member
captainmorgan said:
I looked it up, it takes longer to become a certified auto tech than a xray tech.
Click to expand...
Maybe things have changed since I was turning wrenches . I took & passed all the Michigan Mechanic Certification tests back in the day before ASE Certifications came around . I took & passed all those also . Pass any one of the tests , get hired & bang . . . you're a mechanic in the tests that you passed . Master Mechanics pass them all . Whether or not you stayed one was contingent on your ability to fix it right the first time . :bigjoint:
 
captainmorgan

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
knucklehead bob said:
Maybe things have changed since I was turning wrenches . I took & passed all the Michigan Mechanic Certification tests back in the day before ASE Certifications came around . I took & passed all those also . Pass any one of the tests , get hired & bang . . . you're a mechanic in the tests that you passed . Master Mechanics pass them all . Whether or not you stayed one was contingent on your ability to fix it right the first time . :bigjoint:
Click to expand...
Yeah I have a friend who is certified in everything except transmissions. Turning the wrench is the easy part on new cars, diagnosing with all the computers and sensors is not for a shade tree mechanic anymore. Many things have to be programed when they are replaced too. When he changes jobs he has to have a roll on tow truck move his tools, just his main tool box is over 6' long and nearly that tall.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top