Why is the US South such a backwards shithole?

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
you can do so right now by stating that it should be illegal to have sex with 10 year old children.
False dichotomy is rampant in your declaration.

A person can be opposed to kiddie diddling and also opposed to the current coercion based government at the same time.

You, to your credit appear to be opposed to nonconsensual relations at least some of the time. You then contradict that sentiment when you ask me a question which directs me to buy into your false dichotomy that the mechanism for my opposition against one form of coercion can only come from embracing ANOTHER thing which I oppose, a legal system, which has its origin in coercion.

After you've read this three times and almost grasp it's meaning feel free to feel like a hypocrite.
 

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
you can do so right now by stating that it should be illegal to have sex with 10 year old children.
It already is illegal to have sex with a 10 year old child.

Is it inheriebtly wrong to do so... That is the appropriate question. I'm not so sure there aren't circumstances under which it wouldn't be ok, morally to do so. Ten year olds are closing in on sexual maturity.... If we advance the age to 12 or 13 then sexual maturity has been achieved and the likelihood of circumstances that are morally acceptable increase.


After all, the Muslims that you always seem to praise rever a man as the most holy man to ever live, who married a 6 year old girl and had sex with her at age 9.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Plenty of freedom to.
so if my wife and i have an unplanned pregnancy despite using birth control, can we get an abortion? is that cool?

oh, and by the way, birth control pills are not that hard to get, are they?

before i forget, is my transgender son allowed to use the bathroom of the gender he identifies with, or are you guys busy passing laws about that?

i'll just be over here buying alcohol on sunday and having a puff of my reefer if that's cool with y'all. that is cool, right?

i mean, i do have freedom here, right?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
False dichotomy is rampant in your declaration.

A person can be opposed to kiddie diddling and also opposed to the current coercion based government at the same time.

You, to your credit appear to be opposed to nonconsensual relations at least some of the time. You then contradict that sentiment when you ask me a question which directs me to buy into your false dichotomy that the mechanism for my opposition against one form of coercion can only come from embracing ANOTHER thing which I oppose, a legal system, which has its origin in coercion.

After you've read this three times and almost grasp it's meaning feel free to feel like a hypocrite.
so you refuse to state that it should be illegal to have sex with 10 year old children, and you also don't like being labeled as a pedophile despite this.

you're in a tough spot.

let's see if we can get you out of this. in your imaginary and retarded utopia of panarchy, would it be illegal according to the laws of panarchy to have sex with 10 year old children?
 

BamaBoyBeRolling

Well-Known Member
bignbushy is a fellow conservative right winger from the south like you though.

are you really gonna socially cleanse the south of people who are pretty much exactly like you?
LOL... if someone can even consider having sex with a 10 year old they are nothing like me.
If someone has been convicted of rape they should get a public execution.
 

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
so you think there are times when it should be morally OK to have sex with 10 year olds?
Me personally, not really. But by some moral codes that are not my own there certainly are. And I can't say that I am absolutely right about everything I think.


So, since most 10 year olds have started having their monthly cycles and can give live birth, I can't say that it is absolutely wrong. Not if she is willing and it is in a society where that is common.
 

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
you just outlined one.

you said if she is menstruating and willing, it might be OK.

that's kinda sick, even for you.
Not in the United States.

If i went to a foreign country and found a village where a girl that age had been married off I wouldn't necessarily look at her husband the same way I would Jerry Sandusky or Jared from Subway.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
so suppose you're living in panarchy. are you allowed to have sex with 10 year olds in your fantasy? what happens if you and the 10 year old think it is totally cool to have sex, but everyone else wants to beat you with a club fashioned out of wood?
Panarchy isn't a given circumstance for everybody. It's not an idea based on a coercive monopoly over a given land area, etc. So, again, your questions are formed incorrectly.



Okay, even though you don't deserve it, I'll attempt to answer your question, Pervert.

I don't share your interest in 10 year old boys, therefore my answer is, I can't answer your question as it is, since it implies an inaccuracy about me.

I can say that in a Panarchist world, I would not align with people that engaged in the things that seem to excite you, but if you engaged a person capable of consenting to something and they did consent and it only involved you and them, I'm not sure where I would get the right to intervene.

Perhaps you could tell me when it is appropriate to intervene in a relationship that doesn't involve you directly and the participants are both capable of consenting and do consent?


Would you use force to stop two men from having an affair if they both consented ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Not in the United States.

If i went to a foreign country and found a village where a girl that age had been married off I wouldn't necessarily look at her husband the same way I would Jerry Sandusky or Jared from Subway.
you gave two simple rules of thumb for when you would be willing to have sex with a 10 year old girl. she's menstruating and willing. those were your words, not mine.

you are eeven sicker than i thought you were, bignbushy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
in a Panarchist world...if you engaged a person capable of consenting to something and they did consent and it only involved you and them, I'm not sure where I would get the right to intervene.
so in panarchist world, you would not intervene if your neighbor was bringing home 10 year old children to have sex with, as long as they both said it was OK?

is that what you are saying?
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
so if my wife and i have an unplanned pregnancy despite using birth control, can we get an abortion? is that cool?

oh, and by the way, birth control pills are not that hard to get, are they?

before i forget, is my transgender son allowed to use the bathroom of the gender he identifies with, or are you guys busy passing laws about that?

i'll just be over here buying alcohol on sunday and having a puff of my reefer if that's cool with y'all. that is cool, right?

i mean, i do have freedom here, right?
I have no problem with any of that.

We all just need to live and let live.

Yes I agree that the south is known for hardcore evangelicals. It is getting better.

As you know I believe in god. Go ahead you can mock me for it.

I also believe in separation of church and state. What you do is your business.

There are people, the op described, all over the USA. The world even.

There is evil, racism, and bigotry everywhere.


There are a lot of good people in the south.

The op's statement is just a stereotype.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I have no problem with any of that.

We all just need to live and let live.

Yes I agree that the south is known for hardcore evangelicals. It is getting better.

As you know I believe in god. Go ahead you can mock me for it.

I also believe in separation of church and state. What you do is your business.

There are people, the op described, all over the USA. The world even.

There is evil, racism, and bigotry everywhere.


There are a lot of good people in the south.

The op's statement is just a stereotype.
sounds like he spoke from personal experience.

btw, you didn't rebut all the many ways i noted that the south restricts freedom from consenting adults who are not even harming anyone.

tehn you have southerners like bignbushy arguing that it should be OK to have sex with 10 year olds, but only if they are menstruating and willing.

the south needs better PR.
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
so you refuse to state that it should be illegal to have sex with 10 year old children, and you also don't like being labeled as a pedophile despite this.

you're in a tough spot.

let's see if we can get you out of this. in your imaginary and retarded utopia of panarchy, would it be illegal according to the laws of panarchy to have sex with 10 year old children?
What you see on TV differs from what really goes on. It is easy to get birth control here. My wife was on it. The health department will give you birth control and condoms.
 
Top