Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Dimwit.That's not a nice way to refer to Robert Mueller's Russian collusion investigation!
But it is pretty much on the nose.
Why do detractors constantly fail to argue against policy?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
choomer
Well-Known Member
You don't seem to have much outside of insults.
Come back when you can wear your big boy pants again.
Heil Tweetler
Well-Known Member
Compulsively exposing your hobbled wit and juvenile insecurities, youre a gullible rube.
choomer
Well-Known Member
That wasn't for you but seems incredibly apropos for it to be applied to you from your response.
I'm sure you meant to do that, riiiiiiiiight?
It's also really good that it's coming from a screen name whose claim to fame is that it also belongs to a homosexual hillbilly rapist from "Pulp Fiction".
I'm sure you meant to do that, riiiiiiiiight?
Heil Tweetler
Well-Known Member
Compulsively exposing your hobbled wit and juvenile insecurities, youre a gullible rube.
choomer
Well-Known Member
Don't you have a more varied repository of insult you could use?
Otherwise it appears you stole what I quoted from someone else because it "looks cool", but you really have no idea what is means.
Variety - it's the spice of life!
Heil Tweetler
Well-Known Member
Your wretched doggerel merits only repeated bitch slaps, rube.Don't you have a more varied repository of insult you could use?
Otherwise it appears you stole what I quoted from someone else because it "looks cool", but you really have no idea what is means.
Variety - it's the spice of life!
choomer
Well-Known Member
...and it means soooooo much coming from you considering the way you comport yourself with such elegance and elan.
choomer
Well-Known Member
There is that elan in both the reply and the oh so creatively edited quote!
So if my words are "donkey turds", can't you just keep yourself from consuming them and then not have to reply to my posts while addressing me with the same honorifics you use for your mother and complaining about how they taste?
Be Strong!
Deny the lure of the turd! (unless, of course, you do like the taste and this is just a clever ploy to consume more)
Heil Tweetler
Well-Known Member
Witless clown, im not stepping in that.There is that elan in both the reply and the oh so creatively edited quote!
So if my words are "donkey turds", can't you just keep yourself from consuming them and then not have to reply to my posts while addressing me with the same honorifics you use for your mother and complaining about how they taste?
Be Strong!
Deny the lure of the turd! (unless, of course, you do like the taste and this is just a clever ploy to consume more)
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Usually for someone to be this unpopular on RIU there has to be dozens of white supremacist sock puppets but then they have people on their side.
Choomer managed to get everyone to hate him on his own...
Choomer managed to get everyone to hate him on his own...
MarWan
Well-Known Member
That's not true. I like him. I like how he slaps you and the others around.
He is more intelligent than most of you, and that burns you with jealousy.
Well done Choomer. well done Sir. You earned my respect.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So Marwan the bridge dweller supports Palestine and also really likes and respects a vocal Trump supporter.
I don't think you support Palestine at all, you just hate Jews. That's why you think the Jews perpetrated the holocaust on themselves. Choomer's only friend...
I don't think you support Palestine at all, you just hate Jews. That's why you think the Jews perpetrated the holocaust on themselves. Choomer's only friend...
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
You came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.
State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014
1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D
2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D
3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R
4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D
5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D
6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D
7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D
8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D
9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D
10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D
and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:
11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R
<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>
As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".
Try again?
yeah youve done that around the wrong wayYou came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.
State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014
1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D
2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D
3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R
4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D
5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D
6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D
7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D
8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D
9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D
10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D
and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:
11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R
<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>
As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".
Try again?
in california the 103 billion is 26% of the general revenue that comes in from taxes and stuff so they collect 396.153 billion in taxes for every 103 billion they get in federal subsides
new york collects 187.195 billion in taxes for every 61.4billion they get in federal subsides 32.8%
mississipi collects 14.46 billion in taxes for every 5.8 billion they get in subsides 40.1%
the blue states put in a much higher percentage of what they earn/collect in taxes into the pot than the red states do
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
I was going to try explain it to him but he seems pretty hopeless.
PCXV
Well-Known Member
You've just proven your first assertion incorrect. How much does California pay out compared to how much it recieves from the federal government? New York? Texas? It makes sense that big cities or large economies will socialize to make living conditions better in such limited space.You came with data and I gotta appreciate that you source your data, but let's see if Squeaky is correct.
State welfare exp. federal dep % for gen rev. How much is that? political alignment for 2014
1. California - $103 Billion 26% $103B*.26= $26.78B D
2. New York - $61.4 Billion 32.8% $61.4B*.328=$20.1B D
3. Texas - $35.4 Billion 31.8% $35.4B*.318=$11.2B R
4. Florida - $27.2 Billion 33.2% $27.2B*.332=$9B D
5. Pennsylvania - $26.7 Billion 30.8% $26.7B*.308=$8.2B D
6. Illinois - $21 Billion 26.8% $21B*.268=$5.6B D
7. Ohio - $20 Billion 35% $20B*.35=$7B D
8. Massachusetts - $18.6 Billion 27.8% $18.6*.278=$5.1B D
9. New Jersey - $17.3 Billion 27.3% $17.3B*.273=$4.7B D
10. Michigan - $16.3 Billion 32.3% $16.3*.323=$5.26B D
and for fun comparison the most dependent on federal aid:
11. Mississippi $5.8 Billion 40.1% $5.8*.401=$2.32B R
<political alignment map for 2014 courtesy of http://www.peteradz.com/2014/2014-red-blue-political-map-usa>
As you can see, a higher percentage of subsidization DOES NOT MEAN more money from the federal gov't, aka "drain".
Try again?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
And that takes tax revenue. Funny how the tax bill eliminates the Federal deduction for state taxes. Almost seems deliberately targeted, doesn't it?
dagwood45431
Well-Known Member
Choomer's rage is palpable. He's miserable.