White people, particularly men:

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
No, the fact they are forced to define their property as a a private club, which is a form of seeking permission, means government permission must be part of the equation, therefore the existence of force is self evident. You are struggling and trying to redirect. That means you are losing.

Somehow I didn't think it would be this easy to own you today, I think I'll go smoke a heavy indica and see if I can dumb things down and help you out. I feel bad for you.

Property rights come from government.

I have to repeat stuff like this because you're so far behind, that you think you're ahead.

You're not winning, I'm lapping you.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Property rights come from government.

I have to repeat stuff like this because you're so far behind, that you think you're ahead.

You're not winning, I'm lapping you.

I never consented to you lapping me. Please untie me. Help!! Rape!!

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Property rights come from government.

I have to repeat stuff like this because you're so far behind, that you think you're ahead.

You're not winning, I'm lapping you.

So, in the absence of a coercive government, property rights cannot exist?

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
I never consented to you lapping me. Please untie me. Help!! Rape!!

Oh look, another rape comparison by Robroy...

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
So, in the absence of a coercive government, property rights cannot exist?

Not with out threat of force and or consent of one's community.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Not with out threat of force and or consent of one's community.

Threat of offensive force or defensive force ?

Defining that seems very important to the discussion.

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Threat of offensive force or defensive force ?

Defining that seems very important to the discussion.

Good ideas don't require force.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Oh look, another rape comparison by Robroy...

It was funny. Laugh or I'll call the government in to force you to laugh. You'd like that wouldn't you?

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
It was funny. Laugh or I'll call the government in to force you to laugh. You'd like that wouldn't you?

I'm pretty sure that this is something that you would describe as rape.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Good ideas don't require force.

That's a reasonable statement. Of course you violate it by your other beliefs though.

So, again, offensive force or defensive force?

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
What you keep ignoring is that government force is already involved by virtue of the fact that exclusive deed has been granted. You ignore this so that you can support racial discrimination as a peaceful act.

Then you send these loaded questions at me as if I deny that government force is the only way to get racist ass holes like you to stop discrimination against vulnerable minorities.

No exclusive deed is not granted by government. I've proven you wrong there before and you ran away. Should I do it again?

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
That's a reasonable statement. Of course you violate it by your other beliefs though.

So, again, offensive force or defensive force?

Says the guy who believes that racial discrimination is a peaceful and neutral act and that pedophilia is consensual...

abandonconflict · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
No exclusive deed is not granted by government. I've proven you wrong there before and you ran away. Should I do it again?

No you didn't.

You just made up some bullshit about mixing labor with the earth and unowned property. You fucking love making up hypothetical bullshit and applying it to discussions about reality.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Says the guy who believes that racial discrimination is a peaceful and neutral act and that pedophilia is consensual...

The reason(s) why a person wishes to be left alone on their property and maintain control over their own body do not answer the question of how peace is maintained or broken do they?

You break the peace when you force an association don't you? That is something you advocate.

Also, I think consent is a separate thing from a given act. You have erroneously combined its existence with an act, forgetting that the act itself could be consented to and sometimes it can not be consented to. Two separate things.

You're flailing around. I feel bad for you Anarcho - Fake O .

Harrekin · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
I think what really happened is that you were trying your best to type while sitting at the desk made for grown-ups and your tiny 4' 11" frame was straining and fatigued so you just gave up.

Yep; drunk, potato, 4ft 11.

You're like a broken retarded music box that plays the one same retard tune, retardedly, forever.

Rob Roy · Apr 20, 2015

abandonconflict said:
No you didn't.

You just made up some bullshit about mixing labor with the earth and unowned property. You fucking love making up hypothetical bullshit and applying it to discussions about reality.

Okay. Do you own anything? Can anyone own anything? What establishes ownership?

UncleBuck · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Forced integration is NOT freedom is it?

only people with some really sick views would ever call integration "forced".

the rest of us don't have to be forced, unlike you.

UncleBuck · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
If a person or state wanted to secede for other reasons and they were forcibly prevented from leaving, how is that not like enslaving the person that wished to leave?

because those states wanted to leave for the express purpose of enslaving black people, which you endorse wholeheartedly apparently.

UncleBuck · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Should people be made to serve or associate with others under threat of force?

who is forced to open a public store rather than a private store?

i know you'll never answer that one, because your entire philosophy is predicated upon that flimsy false presuppositoon that you have deluded yourself into believing is reality, although it is not.

UncleBuck · Apr 20, 2015

Rob Roy said:
All of them are forced. Do you deny that?

so every single person who has a public store or a private store is forced to have a store?

further down the retard hole goes robrot.

White people, particularly men:

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member