White people, particularly men:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
and all you had to do was put people through actual slavery, instead of normal taxpaying jobs like americans now do.

it was so racist against whites for us yanks to free those slaves of yours. you must feel so persecuted.

Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?

Courageous slaves "seceded" from situations where they were not able to self determine. That is a good thing.

It seems alot of irony goes right over your (meat) head, when on one hand you support the freedom of some people, but champion the force used by the Union to hold other people in an association they clearly wanted to end.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Poor oppressed Robroy is a slave who is being raped because government forces him to sell things to paying customers who enter his business in public.

Segregation is really freedom.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?
i can literally go to any white supremacy website and find people spewing the same rhetoric as you nearly verbatim.

you are aware that the very first reason they cited for seceding was so that they could continue the institution of slavery, right?

good job on endorsing the enslavement of blacks, spaMBLA.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Should my aunt be referred to as my uncle if she has balls?
I suppose that would depend on how your aunt self identifies, it's really none of my business how he/she/they live their life.

Now, given weve determined a white person shouldn't discriminate against others in their shop, should Jewish people be allowed refuse service to a person with a Hitler-esque mustache?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Keeping people from seceding is always wrong.

All people should be free to chose their associations. Abraham Lincoln, the racist bigot didn't think that was a good thing though did he?

Courageous slaves "seceded" from situations where they were not able to self determine. That is a good thing.

It seems alot of irony goes right over your (meat) head, when on one hand you support the freedom of some people, but champion the force used by the Union to hold other people in an association they clearly wanted to end.
Southern states wanted to seceded in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Southern states wanted to secede in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?
in 1860, the south was responsible for 75% of all US exports. Its no wonder they didn't want that to end. Hard to let go of something that had been practiced the previous 6,000 years.

You made a career out of assisting others in the murder of people? Is THAT a good thing?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Poor oppressed Robroy is a slave who is being raped because government forces him to sell things to paying customers who enter his business in public.

Segregation is really freedom.
Nice try. Except, you failed to address what I've said and you've erroneously tried to re-frame my position, again. You do that a lot when you are unable to refute a point. Maybe you'll grow out of it, maybe not.

Forced integration is NOT freedom is it? No, it isn't.

Human beings shouldn't be forced to segregate or integrate by other people. The individuals involved can and should make those choices.

You advocate forcing people into relationships, I do not. Can you refute that, I don't think you can
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Southern states wanted to seceded in order to expand slavery, is that a good thing ?

Expanding slavery is a horrible idea. I am an abolitionist and think human slavery needs to be abolished, don't you?

If a person or state wanted to secede for other reasons and they were forcibly prevented from leaving, how is that not like enslaving the person that wished to leave?

In other words if you are held in an association you don't want to be in by force we agree that is wrong, correct?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
people have 100% full control over their facial hair, short stuff.

no one has control over what skin color they are born with.

once again, eloquent defense of racism, tiny dancer.

4'11''.

Should people be made to serve or associate with others under threat of force?



I bet you won't answer that question.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Who is forced to have their private clubs made into advertised businesses with their wares available to the public?
The fact a person must make a declaration of private property into one of two classes that a third party has decided exist is self evidence that force is present.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The fact a person must make a declaration of private property into one of two classes that a third party has decided exist is self evidence that force is present.
Property rights come from government and are only made possible by force in the first place. To hide behind this in order to discriminate is not to remain neutral as you say but relies on force.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
Property rights come from government and are only made possible by force in the first place. To hide behind this in order to discriminate is not to remain neutral as you say but relies on force.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.

Aren't you in some exotic foreign country? Why are you even here? Shouldn't you be training people to dive. Your lies are so transparent. Show me that plane ticket. lol
 
Top