What would you do to "Jihad Johnny"?

Doer

Well-Known Member
@UncleBuck was right about the republican party's taste for torture. If we don't prosecute torturers in this country, we really have no right to condemn anyone else for it. 'Do As We Say, Not As We Do' has worn thin with the rest of the world, yet we don't hold them accountable.

It's extremely dangerous over time to act amorally. Sometimes it doesn't even take long- witness the people of Jordan's response to the ISIS video showing them being the pilot alive... They used to be a divided nation, reluctantly drawn in by outsiders.

After that video aired, there are few Jordanians who don't support an all-out war to exterminate them.

The lesson is obvious, but I don't see many repubs reading their history books.
The Pubs sit back read the history and see for a fact, they are about to do this to a US military hostage....a flyer, or a SEAL, or a Forward Air Controller, whoever they get their hands on.
And ISIS will wait for this, until the election season in 2016. They want rough men with rifles to come and fight. They cannot get this from the DEMs.

And the Pubs, knowing history see that horror rally to the cause, that is sweeping Jordan will sweep you aside over here.

The Dems are ultra-wimpy and think we can just call them Thugs and second string. We want to give fair trials to those with no right to it.

But, most of American that pay attention, already know we are heading back to Iraq.

Obama is asking Congress for war authorization. Hillary is no war President.

Don't you know, Presidents hand off war? Maybe you are light on the history.
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Well, because these are not thugs. You are just slinging labels. A Thug? Meaningless.

Here is a thug by your definition.



You can say a thug is anyone who kills? Then we all live by thuggery.

Not really. If a squirrel attacks you, you have the right to defend yourself. The squirrel is the thug in that instance.

The initiator of the aggression is the thug. The being acting defensively is not the thug.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Not really. If a squirrel attacks you, you have the right to defend yourself. The squirrel is the thug in that instance.

The initiator of the aggression is the thug. The being acting defensively is not the thug.
Squirrel attacked me once. I made him my avatar.
 
Top