tRUMP to send 15,000 troops to Mexican border
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
blu3bird
Well-Known Member
I read an article earlier today that said it's going to cost us 50 million for the troops to be on the border, that is crazy.
I say let em over here and give em jobs, there is an unbelievable amount of available factory jobs here in Michigan. From Ludington to Detroit, everywhere I go I see now hiring signs, fairly decent pay, most start at $13-15 an hour with benefits. While it's not a lot of money, it's a decent start. One of the factories in Holland, MI I go to often is hiring at $16 an hour and they're working 70+ hours a week. Those jobs need to be filled and there's not enough people here to do it.
I say let em over here and give em jobs, there is an unbelievable amount of available factory jobs here in Michigan. From Ludington to Detroit, everywhere I go I see now hiring signs, fairly decent pay, most start at $13-15 an hour with benefits. While it's not a lot of money, it's a decent start. One of the factories in Holland, MI I go to often is hiring at $16 an hour and they're working 70+ hours a week. Those jobs need to be filled and there's not enough people here to do it.
srh88
Well-Known Member
Im sure child services has a much different meaning to you than us who believe in an age of consent law
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
Yea, well they can vote their balls off (Pukes), because there are more of us (Dems/Indies) than them.
I think the Independents are going to fuck the GOP hard, but we shall see.
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
Good attitude.
My parents came over from Ireland on a Green card (yea, I'm a birthright baby) and they did work here to survive, that no "sane" American would do.
This fucking country was built on the backs of EXACTLY the same kind of people that are trying to get here now, so all those that scream "keep them out", should look very closely at their own heritage in this country, especially Trump voters, who probably most of descended from fucking goats. (actually I like goats, I don't why I associated the two, but it felt natural/go figure)
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
At an estimated cost of $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 for just the initial deployment.
Thanks Trump for wasting more money and adding to the already fucked up deficit.
But, he'll get more votes, right?
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
slow down there homeboy. me thinks you need a shot of Bushmills and a nice phatty. lol.
everybody here in the US (scottish/english here) came over, worked their asses off, and that's why we still are the best nation in the world no matter what some orange faced, mushroom donged, potus says.
everybody here in the US (scottish/english here) came over, worked their asses off, and that's why we still are the best nation in the world no matter what some orange faced, mushroom donged, potus says.
Jimdamick
Well-Known Member
)
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Actually for a so called service to be a real service to the payor, the payor must have consented to it of their own volition, ie "consensually". (otherwise it's not really a service)
So when you advocate government molestation of people, you're kind of believing in two opposing things at once. One, that nonconsensual relationships are bad. Two, that nonconsensual relationships are good.
If you believe that consent is a good thing, why do you also believe when government wants to do something to a person, that consent isn't necessary ?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
another thought..who picks our fruit and other farming?..works the slaughterhouse?
http://immigrationimpact.com/2018/04/16/undocumented-immigrants-pay-taxes/
'i love the uneducated' -Donald J Trump on himself
Last edited:
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Your argument is a little scant. Fail.
srh88
Well-Known Member
You consented to tax when you bought a house. If the government bothers you so much moveActually for a so called service to be a real service to the payor, the payor must have consented to it of their own volition, ie "consensually". (otherwise it's not really a service)
So when you advocate government molestation of people, you're kind of believing in two opposing things at once. One, that nonconsensual relationships are bad. Two, that nonconsensual relationships are good.
If you believe that consent is a good thing, why do you also believe when government wants to do something to a person, that consent isn't necessary ?
you are mean and i love @hotrodharley..just like i love you..be niceDon't break a hip, hotrod! It's time for your nap.
you mean scat, don't you?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
That would only make sense if the option not to pay tax (and still own a house) were a possibility.
You see, for consent to be part of the discussion, a choice not to do something must exist. If there is an "or else" in the equation, it obliterates the idea that consent is a good thing....and you defend it...like a rapist...dolt.
As far as moving goes, is that what you would tell a woman who'd been raped? She should have moved to another neighborhood and that by remaining in a dangerous neighborhood she was more or less consenting to an assault ?
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Precisely.
The entire system is supposed to be for the greater good, that those who can afford to help those less fortunate do so.
But there's just no pleasing a self-centered, arrogant, narcissistic bastard.
Last edited:
hotrodharley
Well-Known Member
Mean? He's a silly little bitch.you are mean and i love @hotrodharley..just like i love you..be nice