The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
Man do you mean "understand."..shit I'm high and that fucked me up not understanding WTF you meant..lol...stop fucking with my high!!!!...Now sorry, but I do UNDERSTAND whats a superpac..I watched Steven Colbert..lol..but he did show how it can be misused...if you can start a corporation and then donate unlimted money to a committe organized to support ONE certain candidate we can be in a world of trouble...Now you keep thinking anything diffrent and you about to get left behind... read this

A company called W Spann LLC, formed on March 15th, has dissolved shortly after making a $1 million contribution on April 28th to Restore Our Future, a committee organized in support of GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney. According to corporate records obtained by NBC News, the business was formed by Boston-based lawyer Cameron Casey who, as she notes in her online bio on her employer’s website, specializes in “comprehensive estate planning advice to high-net-worth individuals and families.”
The company was dissolved on July 12th, two weeks before Restore Our Future made its first campaign filing. A spokesperson for Ropes & Gray, the law firm for which Casey works, told NBC News that “the firm won’t be making any comment on this matter at this time.” Also noteworthy: Rope & Gray represents Bain Capital, an investment firm formerly headed by Romney.
Adding to the mystery is the fact that the company’s purported address in midtown Manhattan has no records of such a tenant.
A little more about Restore Our Future: The “super PAC,” which maintains that it functions as a separate entity from Romney’s official campaign, was founded by three of Romney’s former political aides. A glance at the group’s website shows no mention of Romney specifically and instead simply notes that “It is time that we restore our future by supporting candidates who have worked in the private sector and created jobs, who understand the economy, and who believe in America, American workers, and American values.” It also claims that it is “Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.”
Then again, as NBC points out, Charles R. Spies, the group’s treasurer and Romney’s general counsel during his 2008 presidential bid, made it clear to The Washington Post that the super PAC has a very clear, definite goal:

lol, I actually had written "I don't think you understand' but I thought that sounded mean, so I meant to rewrite it as "I think you are misunderstanding'. I don't hate you, and you were being fairly civil so I was trying to soften my language. lol. If it had the added benefit of fucking with you, then I can only say the world is as it is lol.

I watched the same Colbert report you are referring to. I love him, he is a very funny guy. The need for keeping track of the money no longer exists. The reason being is that any American citizen, and any American company can donate all the money they want to a pac. The biggest reason for keeping track before was to ensure no one gave over a certain $ amount (which was unconstitutional). It is still illegal for foreigners to donate money to the pacs.

Also, they know who donated the 1 million dollars. It was a single person, Ed Conrad. I have to say that keeping track of private money transactions is questionable. but they already track it anyway. Any bank transaction over a certain amount gets reported. So the issue isn't 'where did the money come from', since the government already knows. The issue is that it is not a matter of public scrutiny. My tax return, my mortgage, my car loan, the receipts from my shopping trip, and my doctor bills are not public matters. Why would donations to causes I believe worthy be any different? Sure, if there is fraud suspected, the government should investigate. However, the people have no inherent right to know what any other citizen does with their money, just as I have no right to know who you voted for.
 

Cali chronic

Well-Known Member
I just re registered to vote as not a Repub or a Dem but open. No longer will I vote for Parties I will vote for the man. Ron Paul you are my man! I don't agree with your religious views but then again I don't like religion. It causes strife and wars.
Ron Paul 2012 President of the USA getting back on track.
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
I just re registered to vote as not a Repub or a Dem but open. No longer will I vote for Parties I will vote for the man. Ron Paul you are my man! I don't agree with your religious views but then again I don't like religion. It causes strife and wars.
Ron Paul 2012 President of the USA getting back on track.
I just registered as a Republican so I can vote for Paul in the primaries so he has the opportunity to run for president and win in 2012, If your not yet Register Republican and vote Ron Paul in the primary
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
Yeah but i'm OCD and get stressed out if I start putting things off and have shit to do it drives me crazy so I do it ahead of time.
Smoke a bong load, relax, sit back, vote in the primaries, in time, then sit back, smoke another bong load all the way to november 2012 and watch Ron Paul win, then smoke another bong load.bongsmilie;-)
 

deprave

New Member
New Interview (focus of discussion is on the financial crisis and the FED)

[video=youtube;qGcJECYz9OQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGcJECYz9OQ[/video]
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
I cant stand how they list ron paul very very last in this bull shit!Also fails to acknowledge how well he is doing in iowa.:fire:

Republican debate comes two days before straw poll


By John Whitesides
AMES, Iowa, Aug 11 (Reuters) - Eight Republican White House hopefuls meet in a nationally televised debate on Thursday, hoping to generate momentum two days before an Iowa straw poll that will test the strength of their campaigns.
The first Republican debate in nearly two months will give struggling contenders like Tim Pawlenty an opportunity to make an impression on Iowa voters before they deliver their verdict in Saturday's non-binding straw poll.
It also gives the rest of the pack a chance to directly confront front-runner Mitt Romney, who was not challenged at the last debate and has largely ignored his rivals to focus his campaign-trail attacks on President Barack Obama.
With less than six months remaining before Iowa holds the first presidential nominating contest in 2012, time is running short for candidates to begin making up ground.
"Given the placement in Iowa just ahead of the straw poll, you will see a lot of attention on this debate," said Donna Hoffman, a political scientist at the University of Northern Iowa.
"I think the campaigns are going to make a calculus that it is time to take on Romney," she said. "There will be a lot of people trying to get noticed and a lot of positioning on social issues."
The debate will be held at Iowa State University, site of Saturday's straw poll, an unofficial mock election that serves as an early gauge of the popularity and organizational muscle of Republican candidates in Iowa.
Looming over the debate is the likely candidacy of Texas Governor Rick Perry, who is expected to make his intent to enter the race clear on Saturday during an appearance in South Carolina that coincides with the straw poll.
Perry also will travel to the early-voting state of New Hampshire on Saturday and visit Iowa on Sunday in a blitz that will steal attention from the straw poll winner and signal his intention to run an aggressive and broad campaign.
COMPETITION FOR ROMNEY
Perry, a staunch social and religious conservative, stresses his strong job creation record in Texas. That could help him compete with Romney for the party's pro-business wing and make him a formidable challenger to Obama.
Romney got into a debating mood during a morning visit to the Iowa state fair in Des Moines, where he had a heated exchange with a group of hecklers who pressed him on whether the wealthy should pay more into the Social Security retirement system.
They shouted and chanted "Wall Street greed" as he tried to answer. "If you don't like my answer, you can vote for someone else," Romney said. "I'm not going to raise taxes, that's my answer. If you want someone who will raise taxes, vote for Barack Obama."
Romney said Social Security and the Medicare and Medicaid healthcare programs for the elderly and poor would have to be part of a long-term solution to the budget deficit.
Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential nominee who has not ruled out a presidential run, was expected to visit the state fair on Friday along with a swarm of other contenders.
The debate, which begins at 9 p.m. EDT (0100 GMT on Friday), also will feature plenty of other story lines in a field of potential challengers to Obama that has not impressed some Republicans.
U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann will try to repeat her successful performance in New Hampshire's June debate and continue her strong showing in Iowa, where she leads polls.
Former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, whose campaign has stalled after a much anticipated debut in June, will be making his first debate appearance on the national stage.
Huntsman is not participating in the straw poll or competing in Iowa, focusing instead on New Hampshire and Florida. Romney also is not participating in the straw poll but says he will compete in the state's caucuses next year.
Pawlenty, the former Minnesota governor who has lagged in single digits in polls in Iowa and nationally, faces a possible make-or-break test in the straw poll and the debate could be his last chance for a direct appeal to Iowa voters.
"He has to gin up some enthusiasm, and he just hasn't done it yet," Hoffman said.
Also participating in the debate will be former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, businessman Herman Cain, former Senator Rick Santorum and U.S. Representative Ron Paul.
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
Fox news poll on the GOP debate, just another to add to the very long list!:clap:


Debate Poll

Make or break: Which candidate needs the strongest showing in the Iowa Straw Poll?



Ron Paul 27.89% (2,503 votes)

Michele Bachmann 15.47% (1,389 votes)

Tim Pawlenty 14.45% (1,297 votes)

Herman Cain 13.07% (1,173 votes)

Mitt Romney 9.71% (872 votes)

Newt Gingrich 9.16% (822 votes)

Rick Santorum 5.47% (491 votes)

Jon Huntsman 4.78% (429 votes)


http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-news-debates/index.html
 

deprave

New Member
FOX NEWS.COM: WHO WON THE DEBATE:
Paul 5583
Gingrich 3572
Cain 1850
Romney 1451
Bachmann 1422
Santorum 683
Huntsman 252
Pawlenty 197
Votes as of 08:17 PM, 08/11/11
 

deprave

New Member
Part 1
[video=youtube;rr9HV_wwssM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr9HV_wwssM[/video]

Part 2
[video=youtube;sJYlsGvZGdc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJYlsGvZGdc[/video]
 
Top