You're acting like my government schooling wasn't paid for several times over, which is really not the main point anyway, but even if your point were valid (it isn't) would refute your silly invalid main point.
You're pretending that the method of funding those schools, via a gun, is a valid one and that when people are forced to pay for something, what follows can be termed a "service" .
Could you explain how you would react if I came to your house and mowed your lawn without your explicit consent and then handed you a bill and demanded payment or I'd steal your house?
Is it possible to fund schools other ways than by threatening people with home seizure?
(stand by all for a nonresponsive "answer" )