I just made my first "chuck"
Hope it aint a cluck
been reading up a little on breeding autos too...Ha ha what about
A STANK. Ass slee skunk male photo plant .
To a blackberry kush auto female?
From my reading i should expect about 25% to be auto seeds at least i hope i get one or 2 for summer lol
But the blackberry smelled like blackberry jam so i had to try it
My seeds are almost finished up soon
You probably already know the first commercial autos were mostly lacking. I tried a few early on and got some which were okay, but not on a par with photo period flowers.I grew up with ditch weed all around and stay away from autos.
This process is about reducing the inbreeding coefficient. Makes me suspect the cannabis breeders. Not once I've heard any breeder out there mentioning that this variable is incorporated in their program, while this variable is common knowledge to those who seriously do animal breeding for livestock or whatnot.And this is part of the reason breeders like Swami do open pollination on their inbred lines. To maintain the genetic information in a selection of seeds not in any one particular seed.
Well i did collect the slee stack pollen because out of all the different males i had at the time he was the stinker2 good parents and the offspring will be good too...
Oh man you gotta try a fast six week strain called bloody skunk. Just throw a couple beans in 2gal pots and let them girls flower while you veg!!!!! Stinky ass delight..... I ain’t kiddingI grew up with ditch weed all around and stay away from autos.
It's not rocket science.
Doesn't take magic or talent or even a whole lot of experience.
Pay attention in 8th grade biology and participate in 4h growing up a you'll breed circles around most of the IG """breeders"""
Time, space, patience, and a tiny bit of luck. I'm tired of these jerks getting treated like gods for crossing a couple hype "strains"
The whole "cubing" thing got me really wondering about that. I know that some organisms can handle a certain degree of inbreeding while others can't just like some can cannabilize (spelling?) Their own without issue while others can't but but with so many doing "reverse" pollination as a quick short cut to help isolate and stabilize traits we're bound to start seeing issues. If nothing else it's at least a guaranteed short cut to losing genetic diversity.I like your line of thought here.
Which make me wonder why almost all cannabis breeding site I've read are obsessed with homozygous genome to achieve a stable strain when there's a way to achieve stable pheno through heterozygosity (though very time consuming process). Cannabis breeders should take their lessons from animal breeders or what happen when homozygosity is carried to the extreme as in the case of pure breed dogs.
Just saying.
Errrr....f2 will actually show more diversity. You get recessive stuff that will pop out so you get even more extremes. After that stuff starts to narrow down.F1 seeds will be your ticket to the most genetic diversity. You'll see some lean towards mom's side, some that lean towards dad's, and every expression in between.
Worked lines will show much more uniformity, so it sounds like you'd want to stay away from those.
Did you read the OP’s question? Because that’s what I was responding to and answering properly.Errrr....f2 will actually show more diversity. You get recessive stuff that will pop out so you get even more extremes. After that stuff starts to narrow down.
Yep I got a gold star for the day I stand by my statement. Cross 2 f1s from the same cross and your gonna get more diversity than the f1s. F2s of ibl’s I don’t think would lead to any more diversity....because they are ibl...which is the point of ibl. Bx’s are bx’s...I don’t think anyone would advertise a bx as a f2. You talking about a f2 after a bx? That I get..to lock down some stuff.Did you read the OP’s question? Because that’s what I was responding to and answering properly.
Did you ever notice most breeders don’t sell F2’s of their work? Thus, leaving F1’s as the OP’s best choice for the genetic diversity he was looking for.
I’m really glad you learned something new today and wanted to share it with the class. Doing one of these dumb “Err, technically you’re wrong because XYZ...” posts is not how we go about it.
Wanna know why?
Because, technically, only inbreed F2 seeds (IBL) would offer the genetics diversity you are speaking of. F2 seeds made from back crossings to one of the parents (BX) is how one starts stabilizing genetics.
So as you can see, your post was an incomplete thought, and misinformative, at best. You don’t fully grasp what you’re typing, you’re just regurgitating factoids that you read in other threads, to make yourself feel smart. I’m sorry to see that this is what your life has been reduced to. I sincerely hope it gets better someday.