mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
in 2000 a vote for Nader was a vote for 8 years of Bush
How well did that go for you?
Not true at all. Gore ended up winning flordia, the results were tampered with and Nader was blamed by the media.
Edit: Gore wasn't really that much of a better option than Bush either. I don't see why people fail to see that. Maybe you should look at Nader's talking points at the time. He was the first to say: "There's a dime of difference between the two parties." Now the Ron Paul bandwagon has hopped on. Third parties need to gain momentum imo so I don't really mind.