mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
Not true at all. Gore ended up winning flordia, the results were tampered with and Nader was blamed by the media.in 2000 a vote for Nader was a vote for 8 years of Bush
How well did that go for you?
Edit: Gore wasn't really that much of a better option than Bush either. I don't see why people fail to see that. Maybe you should look at Nader's talking points at the time. He was the first to say: "There's a dime of difference between the two parties." Now the Ron Paul bandwagon has hopped on. Third parties need to gain momentum imo so I don't really mind.