UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
only for very, very limited and specific purposes, with a huge waiting period and a national registry.
you can't even get one for self defense over there.
Obama Should Order the CIA to Assassinate Snowden...
- Thread starter AlabamaRedneck
- Start date
only for very, very limited and specific purposes, with a huge waiting period and a national registry.
you can't even get one for self defense over there.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
If you look into the language, you will find that in the late 18th century, "well-regulated" meant what "in good tune" would mean today ... in this instance, capable of hitting the point of aim. "Mechanically useful for the purpose". Thinking it means "encumbered by red tape" is a thoroughly modern and execrable overlay. cn
WillyBagseed
Active Member
Now tell the other part of what it means... Lol
And what about the felons guns?
And what about the felons guns?
echelon1k1
New Member
Not really, we had a mass shooting in 1994, that IMO, was staged with restrictive firearms legislation waiting in the wings to be introduced into parliament. Obviously, the legislation rode a wave of support through both houses of parliament, galvanised by public support because of the Port Arthur Massacre. He used an AR-15 variant too...
So they brought in very tight gun laws, banned magazine capacity over 10 rounds, limited pistol calibres to no higher than a .38 and banned automatic weapons.
Over the last 40 years we've had like 20 or 25 mass shootings and many Australians don't want to see laws tightened any further, which I don't think they will be.
We actually own more guns now than we did in the '90s and more legal guns are in circulation. Only 16% of homicides are due to GSW.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
As far as I know, you don't have the right to not be randomly murdered by crazy fucks
echelon1k1
New Member
jew mad again bro? Go be prepared with your axe, I've got a gun just like you yanks...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
and no mass murders since!
but gun control won't stop mass murders.
except that they do.
i recall something about life, liberty and the pursuit of property.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
pointless invocation of your anti-semitism aside, are you really intimating that you're a weed thief?
wouldn't surprise me.
echelon1k1
New Member
The laws are strict and I only keep a 9mm at my house all my rifles are locked up at my parents house because the police can come round and inspect them at anytime and I have, umm, other stuff here...
You can own any gun apart from an automatic. .45 pistols are hard to get because it requires a special licence category, but if your in the military or law enforcement you can buy restricted items like mace, batons, tactical gear etc and some can own restricted weapons. But the later is very rare...
WillyBagseed
Active Member
The other part would be "organized". Rules and or regulations are needed for an organized, well run militia.
Still waiting on an answer about felons and guns.
If any regulation is considered infringement then felons and crazies should be allowed to have guns. Taking their right away is infringement.
Still waiting on an answer about felons and guns.
If any regulation is considered infringement then felons and crazies should be allowed to have guns. Taking their right away is infringement.
echelon1k1
New Member
I'm not a BUCK* but thanks for playing...
WillyBagseed
Active Member
Shall not be infringed
It doesn't say shall not be infringed except in cases of felonies or mental instability.
It doesn't say shall not be infringed except in cases of felonies or mental instability.
echelon1k1
New Member
No huge waiting period and you've advocated for a national registry before so don't now pretend you're all patriotic and pro 2A...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
just a 28 day delay, no big deal.
i think you've confused me advocating for a national registry with me pointing out that more than 2/3 of americans favor a national gun registry.
thanks for the new sig, lowlife.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
How do you expect the US government to protect every citizen from random insane psychopaths?
echelon1k1
New Member
One month is not a huge delay, if your unemployed like you it might seem so...
You calling me weed thief without a shred of evidence, while you've been exposed here as a RAT by various members?
WillyBagseed
Active Member
I myself don't care either way. What i care about is not picking and choosing only what you like about the constitution. Like many religious folk do either their bible.
Either:
shall not be infringed
Meaning crazies and felons get to have guns
Or
Gun rights with regulations
You can make a case for either but not both.
Either:
shall not be infringed
Meaning crazies and felons get to have guns
Or
Gun rights with regulations
You can make a case for either but not both.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're confusing no evidence with clear evidence.
if you look at my sig, you'll see very clear evidence of you threatening to steal my work.
whereas you have zero evidence whatsoever of any rattery. otherwise you'd have it right in your sig.
i think i'll be keeping this sig for a while.
WillyBagseed
Active Member
By the way. Are any of you actually ignorant enough to think your .50cal, 9mm, 7.62 ,.223 or anything else you own is going to protect you from an abrams tank, a drone..... Lol
echelon1k1
New Member
You're right, I own firearms, you own an axe and a very large angry wife owns you...
You call that evidence... When claiming we have gun "prohibition" you forgot to mention Australians can own guns... Good one...
Evidence is other members clearly identifying you as someone who has ratted growers out to law enforcement, but with a name like UNCLE BUCK* that would be a given. Keep the sig as long as you'd like douchebag...
pro tip - I wouldn't steal your "work" if you can call it that, i'm growing buds that far outsize yours and I'm only on my 3rd run ever, apparently you do this for a living...
Similar threads
