cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
the whole point of the second amendment has changed a whole lot since the days of cannonballs and muskets and no standing army.
This is where we disagree. cn
the whole point of the second amendment has changed a whole lot since the days of cannonballs and muskets and no standing army.
This is where we disagree. cn
don't underestimate what a healthy set of deterrents can do in mitigating carnage, both frequency and volume.
What kind of deterrents? Deterrents might have stopped zimmerman but it isn't going to stop someone from walking into a mall or movie. theater and mowing people down. There is no deterrent for that kind of crazy. That stems from people not giving a shit about people who may be showing signs of snapping. Apathy
which make it the ideal weapon for killing humans not in self defense.
a gun safe is a great deterrent, would have stopped lanza in his tracks since another deterrent (background checks) kept him from even trying to buy a gun legally, and his own social inabilities and lack of money would have precluded him from obtaining arms illegally.
Not so with holmes...
If I am going to be taken out by a lunatic I would rather be shot than stabbed or beat to death with a bat.yeah, for people like holmes, we would have needed aussie-like prohibition, which no one in the states is for (save some really reality-deluded, naive folks).
we will never change our constitution to be like yours, the second is here to stay.
yeah, for people like holmes, we would have needed aussie-like prohibition, which no one in the states is for (save some really reality-deluded, naive folks).
we will never change our constitution to be like yours, the second is here to stay.
Well Buck, you are easily confused...
For those of you who thought I must have been kidding with the assassination thing, I'm not. The CIA has assassinated untold numbers of political dissidents over the years. Hell, Obama surely ordered that Osama Bib Laden be "not taken alive" (that's "assassinated" to you Buck).
Snowden is a traitor, and may be able to do grave damage to the national security of the United States with what he can (and surely will) disclose to our enemies.
My guess is that many such traitors have been assassinated before. Hell, if I was in the CIA, I'd be glad to do the job myself...if I was ordered to do so by a superior...
your right to kill a deer more easily does not trump someone else's right to not be picked off by a sniper.
I agree, but the number of people hunting for food absolutely exceeds the number of insane snipers who decide to start picking off civilians, would you agree?
sniper rifles serve no purpose for self defense, they are tools of war. they serve no purpose in civilian life besides to make a murderer's life easier.
Can you expand? As the beltway "sniper" used a m4 carbine variant and not a precision rifle or "sniper rifles" as you call them...
I can go out right now and buy a "sniper rifle" chambered for a .338 Lapua... Obviously the definition of "prohibition" escapes you at this time.
We didn't change our constitution so keep on a failing there feinstein... Your views on firearms is laughable; watching you flail away while you taint another thread with ignorance is priceless!
Not only can you apprehend criminals, you can prosecute them as well.
Private Attorney General.
Most criminal prosecutions today in the United States and other countries in the Anglo-American legal tradition are conducted by public prosecutors who are public employees, but until the late 19th century most criminal prosecutions in the United States were conducted by private persons, usually but not always lawyers, either paid by private parties or asked by the court to serve pro bono. Private criminal prosecutions are still legal in several of those countries, including several states of the United States.
I use this.
Quo warranto (Medieval Latin for "by what warrant?") is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or "franchise") they claim to hold.
Or this depending on the situation.
Qui tam
In common law, a writ of qui tam is a writ whereby a private individual who assists a prosecution can receive all or part of any penalty imposed. Its name is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur, meaning "[he] who sues in this matter for the king as [well as] for himself." A more literal translation would be "who as much for [our] lord the king as for himself in this action pursues" or "follows."
I focus on so called law enforcement and judges. That's what I do. What I'm known for.
The good little Germans do not have all the power. We do. They can screw with all the other dummies but they know I will eat their substance. That's a fact.
This is interesting echelon. I wanted to ask you if Australians experience the same kind of random mass murdering like here in the US?
I don't know their gun laws. I do know that echelon said he owns a gun so they must be available.not since the government forced a firearms agreement on them and bought back all their guns in 1996.
no mass murders since.