Just 158 families contributed half of all funding in 2016 elections

londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
There is nothing wrong with what you want. There is something wrong with forcing a person to serve you.
Click to expand...
Name one person that was forced to open a store or any public establishment.
If you don't want to serve everyone make your establishment private. Please allow your mother the civil rights to shop in any public establishment without being disrespected and asked to leave due to being a female
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
travisw said:
Quick question.

You've repeatedly made the point that there's no difference between establishment democrats and republicans.

According to your source, those 158 families, mostly back republicans.


Republicans:138 Democrats:20

If they really are the same, shouldn't there be more parity here?
Click to expand...
I like that you used piles of legos...

It's an economical and cognitively easy way to present your statistics to morons.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Name one person that was forced to open a store or any public establishment.
If you don't want to serve everyone make your establishment private. Please allow your mother the civil rights to shop in any public establishment without being disrespected and asked to leave due to being a female
Click to expand...
All property of the type you reference that is owned, is already private though.

So the force you can't seem to locate by the nature of your question isn't non existent. It is pervasively omnipresent and occurs when a property owners right to self determine is removed and replaced with an edict from an entity that doesn't own the property, your lord and master, the "authorities" .

This is evidenced when you declare the possible options as only one of two things, either ask government for permission to open an oxymoronic "public store" or ask government to redundantly grant you, the alleged owner, the privilege of operating as if the property were private, when it ALREADY is.

While I realize, I am absolutely and irrefutably correct, I look forward to your next foray into the absurd with another feeble attempt to mount an argument which will likely cave in due to its own contradiction. (that means I'm still winning)

Removing the ability of a person to self determine is an excellent example of disrespect isn't it ?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
All property of the type you reference that is owned, is already private though.

So the force you can't seem to locate by the nature of your question isn't non existent. It is pervasively omnipresent and occurs when a property owners right to self determine is removed and replaced with an edict from an entity that doesn't own the property, your lord and master, the "authorities" .

This is evidenced when you declare the possible options as only one of two things, either ask government for permission to open an oxymoronic "public store" or ask government to redundantly grant you, the alleged owner, the privilege of operating as if the property were private, when it ALREADY is.

While I realize, I am absolutely and irrefutably correct, I look forward to your next foray into the absurd with another feeble attempt to mount an argument which will likely cave in due to its own contradiction. (that means I'm still winning)

Removing the ability of a person to self determine is an excellent example of disrespect isn't it ?
Click to expand...
You winning but Civil Rights is active and alive. Keep up with the winning.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You haven't refuted my point though. Your 'argument" validated my point and invalidated yours, that there is an element of offensive force.


Next...
Click to expand...
You make ZERO points. You think you are winning when in fact you are losing.
We still have the Civil Rights Act live and active, in which you are against. We still have laws to stop adult from having sex with minors. Something you also disagree with. You still pay taxes, in which you hate. How are you winning ?
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
http://amp.timeinc.net/time/4069214/2016-election-spending-campaign-finance

Anyone still think we live in a democracy?
Click to expand...
it's never been a democracy, it's a constitutional federal republic...just cause people call it something doesn't make it so....the biggest thing that makes us not a democracy is the electoral college....which was and always will be a way for those in power to subvert the will of the people. that's the very first thing that has to go. there should be a government run fund for campaigns. all candidates get the same amount of money to use for their campaigns, not one penny more, they're all guaranteed the same amount of press coverage, it's up to them what they do with it. no private contributions, period. no privately paid ads, period. no mudslinging, no negative ads about opponents. talk about yourself, tell us what you plan to do if elected....if you can't convince people from your own state to support you, you suck at politics, get out and find another career
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
You make ZERO points. You think you are winning when in fact you are losing.
We still have the Civil Rights Act live and active, in which you are against. We still have laws to stop adult from having sex with minors. Something you also disagree with. You still pay taxes, in which you hate. How are you winning ?
Click to expand...
Another meme that's incredible disrespectful of those with disabilities.

You're a pretty sick human being.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
it's never been a democracy, it's a constitutional federal republic...just cause people call it something doesn't make it so....the biggest thing that makes us not a democracy is the electoral college....which was and always will be a way for those in power to subvert the will of the people. that's the very first thing that has to go. there should be a government run fund for campaigns. all candidates get the same amount of money to use for their campaigns, not one penny more, they're all guaranteed the same amount of press coverage, it's up to them what they do with it. no private contributions, period. no privately paid ads, period. no mudslinging, no negative ads about opponents. talk about yourself, tell us what you plan to do if elected....if you can't convince people from your own state to support you, you suck at politics, get out and find another career
Click to expand...
Lol

So your answer to bring called out is to admit we aren't a democracy.

Well then maybe you can explain why America is sold as a democracy?

More to the point, why shouldn't it be?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I guess I hit a sore spot.
Do you think it is better to win a medal at the Special Olympics versus not being retard ?
Congratulations on your medal
Click to expand...
Yep, ripping on mentally disabled people to score political points.

You sound just like Trump. Seriously.
 
J

Jenns36

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
I guess I hit a sore spot.
Do you think it is better to win a medal at the Special Olympics versus not being retard ?
Congratulations on your medal[/QUOTE.
.
You are one messed up kind of individual I have to agree on this one that is very disrespectful and inappropriate but I think we know who the real low life is here! Maybe you better go pick up your medal Londonfog it's waiting for you on the podium with your low life trophy!!!
Click to expand...
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
it's never been a democracy, it's a constitutional federal republic...just cause people call it something doesn't make it so....the biggest thing that makes us not a democracy is the electoral college....which was and always will be a way for those in power to subvert the will of the people. that's the very first thing that has to go. there should be a government run fund for campaigns. all candidates get the same amount of money to use for their campaigns, not one penny more, they're all guaranteed the same amount of press coverage, it's up to them what they do with it. no private contributions, period. no privately paid ads, period. no mudslinging, no negative ads about opponents. talk about yourself, tell us what you plan to do if elected....if you can't convince people from your own state to support you, you suck at politics, get out and find another career
Click to expand...
ttystikk said:
Lol

So your answer to bring called out is to admit we aren't a democracy.

Well then maybe you can explain why America is sold as a democracy?

More to the point, why shouldn't it be?
Click to expand...
Word smith it how you like.

We elect our officials and can replace them if we don't like them.

Call it what you want. To me that's a democracy.

Speaking of making up words, tty, what do you mean when you use the word: "Progressive"?
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Word smith it how you like.

We elect our officials and can replace them if we don't like them.

Call it what you want. To me that's a democracy.

Speaking of making up words, tty, what do you mean when you use the word: "Progressive"?
Click to expand...
in a democracy, each persons vote actually counts....whoever get's the most votes wins......that is NOT the case in this country...the electoral college is a body whose sole purpose is to make the popular vote meaningless. they may have other excuses for it's existence, but that's all they are, as far as i'm concerned.
local and state politics are a little more democratic, it's true, but the big one? not so much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top