Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

the fact that the moon rock is older than earth doesnt conflict with the narrative which is earth was hit by massive body and the moon is the ejecta contains some of both rocks and also its circular orbit rather than an elliptical one as would be expected if the earth caught the moon in its gravity well

zeddd said:

the fact that the moon rock is older than earth doesnt conflict with the narrative which is earth was hit by massive body and the moon is the ejecta contains some of both rocks and also its circular orbit rather than an elliptical one as would be expected if the earth caught the moon in its gravity well

Click to expand...

Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. I thought the suggestion was that the moon is older than the earth. My bad.

zeddd said:

the fact that the moon rock is older than earth doesnt conflict with the narrative which is earth was hit by massive body and the moon is the ejecta contains some of both rocks and also its circular orbit rather than an elliptical one as would be expected if the earth caught the moon in its gravity well

Click to expand...

a senile fungus said:

Click to expand...

I knew she was hiding something. Far too dismissive about how much time she really had in front of the cameras. The perfect foil.

SunnyJim said:

I knew she was hiding something. Far too dismissive about how much time she really had in front of the cameras. The perfect foil.

Click to expand...

Little does sweet mama brown know that I actually did have the time for that.

How presumptuous of her!

btw is the moon also supposed to be flat to flat earthers?

Moon rocks, huh? Fake, http://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

They are wooden stones. Or, "Woden" stones. But, that's a whole nother story.

There have been many reports of people seeing through the moon at times of low luminosity.

Subbed


This is gonna be a nominee for Thread of the Year.

tyler.durden said:

It would be VERY difficult to get to the edge of a flat planet (if such a planet were possible), the gravity would be immense at the edges...

Click to expand...

would it be?
I mean that's sorta something that should be constant no?
Oh wait, are you referring to the centrifugal force?
cuz then, hells yea... i'd be living at the equator.. or umm the uh.. um.. center of the world.. Where would that be, by the way?
Course discussing/theorizing that is a lil difficult...
And since the elliptical pattern of the earth is the way it is, I often wonder if the "flat" earth is on it's side... And whats causing our gravity?...
I'm not arguing anymore, im genuinely curious as to what you guys think?
And the sun is still round right? or is that flat too?

Sure Shot said:

There have been many reports of people seeing through the moon at times of low luminosity. View attachment 3598831

Click to expand...

That's hilarious..
Had to "like" that one..

It's amazing how far the delusion is protected. That's the only newsworthy thing here.

The premise is crazy yet look how far one can go to defend the absurd.

Even Einstein said (paraphrase) "to think of the Earth as moving, is like being in a wagon and thinking the street moves". We know it's not moving, but only appears to be so, and can still be used to describe the events witnessed.

Sure Shot said:

Even Einstein said (paraphrase) "to think of the Earth as moving, is like being in a wagon and thinking the street moves". We know it's not moving, but only appears to be so, and can still be used to describe the events witnessed.

Click to expand...

I fairly certain you are paraphrasing and not understanding...
The theory of relativity pretty much contradicts the idea of a flat earth
I really hope you aren't implying that Einstein backed any theory about the earth being flat.

Sure Shot said:

Moon rocks, huh? Fake, http://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html

Click to expand...

the first bit of real science you've posted, are you coming round? Ive seen this b4 lol its another nail in the Apollo lie but not conclusive, I was explaining the accepted paradigm and the accepted science of the moon but the anomalies indicate another possibility as you have demonstrated with the lignite moonrock, but flat earth is just trolling unless you can discuss the edge....

the gravity at the edge would be fkin unreal, mass is a function of gravity so the greater the mass we are standing on the more heavy we would feel, in a flat earth scenario we are being influenced by the mass directly beneath our feet so dunno how flat the disc is but say few hundred miles or is it thinner, (I will never know this answer) so 1 g is from say 200 miles of bedrock (what about the sideways gravity lol ), if u stand on the edge you will be under the pull of 12 000 miles of bedrock or 60 g

zeddd said:

the gravity at the edge would be fkin unreal, mass is a function of gravity so the greater the mass we are standing on the more heavy we would feel, in a flat earth scenario we are being influenced by the mass directly beneath our feet so dunno how flat the disc is but say few hundred miles or is it thinner, (I will never know this answer) so 1 g is from say 200 miles of bedrock (what about the sideways gravity lol ), if u stand on the edge you will be under the pull of 12 000 miles of bedrock or 60 g

Click to expand...

AND centrifugal force..
Course if the earth was thin, it's mass would be MUCH less, the core of the planet is where a LOT of our mass is, molten metal is damn dense...
Ahhh... this is totally a pointless discussion.. but I find it entertaining at the least...

Are we entertaining the moon landing hoax now? Jesus h Christ