Fogdog
Well-Known Member
it's happening all across this country and as the baby boomers move into advanced age it's just going to become common.
is the NRA a terrorist organization?
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if i was a lying drunk i would sound like you
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
I laugh at people that are stupid enough to bring that up. The entire Benghazi event can be summed up in just a few sentences:
- The embassy was attacked and sacked killing 4 Americans.
- Within hours, the head of security of the embassy, who is NOT a military specialist, told Hillary Clinton that "a protest got out of hand and they rioted and attacked the embassy".
- Clinton, being pressed by the public and media for any information, told them exactly what she was told - that the head of security said it was a demonstration that got out of hand.
- Clinton, being an intelligent person, thought there was more to it than that and even voiced that opinion to several others. Clinton was of the opinion that it was somehow a planned attack and not some random act.
- Two weeks later, after an investigation by professional military personnel, Clinton's thought that there was more to it was confirmed.
- Clinton then released that information to the public.
That's all there is or ever was to it.
It's really no different than any other investigation at any level. Example, a cop shows up at the scene of an accident and is told a story about what happened. That goes into his report. Then when the investigation reveals that the person in question was traveling much faster than he had stated, the report is amended.
It doesn't mean the cop lied. It simple means he stated what he was told and later amended that with what the actual investigation showed.
Republicans used it as a smear campaign and nothing more. They wasted more time, money, energy and resources on that stupid shit than The Warren Commission and Watergate combined.
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
Lol. If you sounded like me people might believe you are a smart Jewish boy.
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
I think it was the part where you said something about cold dead hands. I guess that was in response to the "pry them out of my cold dead hands" that some gun owners have.
Gun owners are worried that registration will lead to confiscation. I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand I don't want them registered. On the other I've bought all firearms legally with a paper trail except a few that were gifts. I also have a ccwp.
I think if it came right down to it I wouldn't turn mine in. I would bury them somewhere. Maybe turn in a few.
I don't see it coming to that. Generally in the past when firearms were banned the ones already owned where grandfathered in.
If there is another assault weapons ban I don't see how it would work out. So many out there. 80% receivers. A 80% receiver is not considered a firearm and is the same as a paper weight to the atf. Its not until its milled out that it is a firearm. A person could order them and keep them put up.
Its sad. If it needs done it needs done. It was really unsettling when the family member with dementia was threating to shoot kids for just playing outside. He thought the kids where there to rob him.
Demnentia is a horrible disease.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
You are still quoting someone else with that. I asked that poster to use the word frugal to be polite.
But you are so upset you are not liked you see sock puppets all around you.
I will clue you in. Your posting here is not important. No one cares. They just don’t want you insulting them. Things would be better here without you posting. Even your keepers brother knows it.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Number of times the government has ever "come for your guns": Zero.
It has never happened.
It has never even been mentioned.
What has been talked about a LOT are a universal background check - where EVERYBODY, even private sales, have to have a background check.
AND
Titling guns.
In the end, what most rational people want is for guns to be treated like cars. You buy one, you get a background check and a title for the gun in your name. You sell that gun, you and the buyer make a quick trip to the gun store, pay the 10 dollar fee (or whatever it is) and he gets a background check and the title of the gun transfers to him.
Here's why the NRA fights both of those:
Most guns get into the hands of criminal by way of legal buyers. They buy the guns for 400 bucks and sell them privately to criminals for double that. Criminals will pay it because the only other way they can get one is to steal one, and they sort of need the gun to do their stealing.
That would cut gun sales by an estimated 40%. It would devastate the gun industry by making it nearly impossible to sell a gun to someone that shouldn't have one.
So the gun nuts that deal illegally are against it and the NRA is against it because the gun manufacturers are against it.
Would it end all gun crimes?
No. Of course not. But within 20 years it would reduce it by an estimated 70% as the guns available dry up and the only people left owning them are, surprise surprise, the people that can legally own them.
It has never happened.
It has never even been mentioned.
What has been talked about a LOT are a universal background check - where EVERYBODY, even private sales, have to have a background check.
AND
Titling guns.
In the end, what most rational people want is for guns to be treated like cars. You buy one, you get a background check and a title for the gun in your name. You sell that gun, you and the buyer make a quick trip to the gun store, pay the 10 dollar fee (or whatever it is) and he gets a background check and the title of the gun transfers to him.
Here's why the NRA fights both of those:
Most guns get into the hands of criminal by way of legal buyers. They buy the guns for 400 bucks and sell them privately to criminals for double that. Criminals will pay it because the only other way they can get one is to steal one, and they sort of need the gun to do their stealing.
That would cut gun sales by an estimated 40%. It would devastate the gun industry by making it nearly impossible to sell a gun to someone that shouldn't have one.
So the gun nuts that deal illegally are against it and the NRA is against it because the gun manufacturers are against it.
Would it end all gun crimes?
No. Of course not. But within 20 years it would reduce it by an estimated 70% as the guns available dry up and the only people left owning them are, surprise surprise, the people that can legally own them.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
Thank you. But everyone knows about your many accounts.
It’s the new members that you attack that obviously have no idea what your talking about I was referring too.
Poordefensiveonlyprovinghisownselfdoubtunclesuck
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
srh88
Well-Known Member
This is why AR's will never get banned. They are super easy to make now. If they stopped selling the lowers, just get one milled.
All you need now is a few hundred bucks.. a drill press and basic tools and you can make a fully funtional ar
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
You didn’t quote the original post I answered. Just your troll post.
Everyone but you and maybe fogdog knows I am neither. Why can’t you just debate with the actual facts.
You are a terrible liar. Seems odd you would continue doing it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how is a screenshot of you calling jews "lying penny pinching rats" not factual?
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
It shows you saying that not me. You have poor eyesight too?
Better question is how can you lose so bad with years of trolling experience?
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
Its legal to make your own firearm. You just can't sell it.
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
and give the rifle to somebody else to have them fire it to double check your headspacing.
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
No. The opposite was and is still happening. I can keep you doing this forever.
You need to like your real life dude. This is all just part of your addiction.
I still open my invitation to you to stop by and get high on great uplifting happy feeling pot and if you can wait a couple months for my surgery Thursday to heal I will take you on a lovely kayak trip right in the town I live.
You seriously need a break man. You are way past being likable anymore.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you are claiming that you were grilling that anti-semite, the one who said the anti-semitic thing, by defending her comment, which she even gave you a like for?
jesus christ you suffer some nasty delusions
if i ever saw you in person id knock the last three meth-stained teeth you have down the back of your throat, klantard
MichiganMedGrower
Well-Known Member
Ttystick got so upset with me he threatened to beat me up too.
I was grillin you. Like a chicken.
You would lose at violence with me too bud. I have history. You are a geek.