is the NRA a terrorist organization?

is the NRA a terrorist organization?

  • yes

  • no, they just want people who do gun massacres to be well-equipped to massacre

Results are only viewable after voting.
apollo4201982

apollo4201982

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
he was literally doing security detail for putin in niger. we did not have access to chad's resources because of his retarded muslim ban. a soldier was left behind to be mutilated and burned. closed casket funeral.so it was a LOT worse.

but that's again, just a distraction.

do you think he NRA is a terrorist organization, since they make sure terrorists are well equipped to gun massacre innocent civilians?
Click to expand...
Like bengazi worse?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
apollo4201982 said:
Like bengazi worse?
Click to expand...
you mean that thing that republicans investigated and got caught lying about for 2 years and no wrongdoing was found by republicon committee after republicon committee?

goddamn you are fucking retarded. you have not been right about one thing since you have started.

stop trying.

Screenshot 2018-04-01 at 6.25.49 PM.png
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so then the university of sydney school of public health is correct with their numbers, but you are trying to create a weird conspiracy theory over the fact that they were put there by an anonymous person.

yeah, you are fucking retarded, klanlardo.
Click to expand...

It says it was anonymously edited after their post.

You are trusting it anyway because it supports your argument. If it didn’t you would find a reason it was wrong instead.

Buckybadatdebatingcrybaby
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
It says it was anonymously edited after their post.

You are trusting it anyway because it supports your argument. If it didn’t you would find a reason it was wrong instead.

Buckybadatdebatingcrybaby
Click to expand...
so when you click on the citation that goes back to the university of sydney school of public health, you are saying it shows different numbers and should not be trusted?

what exactly is your pointless blather about here, klanlardo?
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so when you click on the citation that goes back to the university of sydney school of public health, you are saying it shows different numbers and should not be trusted?

what exactly is your pointless blather about here, klanlardo?
Click to expand...

Yeah I just followed the link you provided.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
Yeah I just followed the link you provided.
Click to expand...
wikipedia says UK had 0.23 deaths per 100,000 in 2011

Screenshot 2018-04-01 at 10.23.01 PM.png

wikipedia cites the university of sydney school of public health, which shows the exact same number

Screenshot 2018-04-01 at 10.22.42 PM.png



while your strategy of just lying your ass off is bold, it certainly is not a good strategy.

do some more meth and tell some more lies, methiganklanman.
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
wikipedia says UK had 0.23 deaths per 100,000 in 2011

View attachment 4115506

wikipedia cites the university of sydney school of public health, which shows the exact same number

View attachment 4115507



while your strategy of just lying your ass off is bold, it certainly is not a good strategy.

do some more meth and tell some more lies, methiganklanman.
Click to expand...

What lies? I use an iPhone. When I opened the link it showed a set of headings and that last time it was edited. I had to click to open more info.

Your little world in front of your computer isn’t the whole world you know? And you don’t know enough about anything to assume you have the final answer.

Just your childish tactics during any level of disagreement shows the massive doubts you have about yourself.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
What lies? I use an iPhone. When I opened the link it showed a set of headings and that last time it was edited. I had to click to open more info.

Your little world in front of your computer isn’t the whole world you know? And you don’t know enough about anything to assume you have the final answer.

Just your childish tactics during any level of disagreement shows the massive doubts you have about yourself.
Click to expand...
i asked you if the link to the university of sydney public health showed different numbers than wikipedia and you said "yeah"

i then demonstrated that you were lying through your three remaining, meth-stained teeth

no need to have a meltdown, you got caught lying yet again. you should be used to it by now.

never trust a meth addict is the lesson here
 
Abiqua

Abiqua

Well-Known Member
apollo4201982 said:
I think the obama administration was more terrorist than the nra.
View attachment 4115342
Click to expand...
To me just looking at the gun rate of countries and the data it seems that high gun ownership definitely correlates to increased suicides and a moderate to low overall rate of all gun deaths, but it also seems that the highest ownership of guns seems to stymie a higher murder rate, although Swiss is an outlier, where its even lower, but their suicide rate makes up 85% or more of their overall rate and culturally Europe seems to have a low overall rate, probably since the french revo and all.

Latin america and most of africa seem to be exactly opposite of high ownership countries, they have extremely low rates of ownership and most have anywhere from 2-6x the overall murder rate of the US and have minmal suicide rates and high rates of gun homicide, almost exclusively most of the overall gun death rate. Venezeula has free healthcare and 59 deaths/100,000, so thats probably a good thing, high rates in virtually all of Central and South America and non Arabic part of Africa, stats wise.
Chile is an obvious exception, however they dont grow cocao and the Andes and the sea provide historical natural barriers. All of the North African states have oil. Are they correlations, maybe, maybe not.

The pacific rim opposite of us has moderate rates, the Phillipines is similar to US in overall rate, but they have a 10,000 of 1% of the amount of gun ownership that the US has...

Also multi ethnic societies seem to dominate the high rate of ownership/moderate to low amounts of gun death rates.


Who has a state by state breakdown
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Abiqua said:
To me just looking at the gun rate of countries and the data it seems that high gun ownership definitely correlates to increased suicides and a moderate to low overall rate of all gun deaths, but it also seems that the highest ownership of guns seems to stymie a higher murder rate, although Swiss is an outlier, where its even lower, but their suicide rate makes up 85% or more of their overall rate and culturally Europe seems to have a low overall rate, probably since the french revo and all.

Latin america and most of africa seem to be exactly opposite of high ownership countries, they have extremely low rates of ownership and most have anywhere from 2-6x the overall murder rate of the US and have minmal suicide rates and high rates of gun homicide, almost exclusively most of the overall gun death rate. Venezeula has free healthcare and 59 deaths/100,000, so thats probably a good thing, high rates in virtually all of Central and South America and non Arabic part of Africa, stats wise.
Chile is an obvious exception, however they dont grow cocao and the Andes and the sea provide historical natural barriers. All of the North African states have oil. Are they correlations, maybe, maybe not.

The pacific rim opposite of us has moderate rates, the Phillipines is similar to US in overall rate, but they have a 10,000 of 1% of the amount of gun ownership that the US has...

Also multi ethnic societies seem to dominate the high rate of ownership/moderate to low amounts of gun death rates.


Who has a state by state breakdown
Click to expand...
I support gun owners using their guns for suicide.
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i asked you if the link to the university of sydney public health showed different numbers than wikipedia and you said "yeah"

i then demonstrated that you were lying through your three remaining, meth-stained teeth

no need to have a meltdown, you got caught lying yet again. you should be used to it by now.

never trust a meth addict is the lesson here
Click to expand...

If you are going to infer and insert your own meaning to my words or change them to pretend it makes you win something there is no use including you in any conversation.


You are the constant liar and bully. You have more than been discredited. Keep pretending you seem intelligent. Seems more important to you than learning anything about real life.

Now tell us. Why did you want to buy a gun with all the evidence you may have shot yourself?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top