is the NRA a terrorist organization?
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The 2A is all about being able to fight off BIG GOVERNMENT when the cultural marxists elect a communist president like Obama who just wants to take our guns and make health care affordable. The answer to 1984 is 1776. Please consider buying some of these dick pills and water filters.
SmokeyMcChokey
Well-Known Member
I think ole obammy was more like socialism light than he was a communist. And frankly I agree.as ridiculous as it sounds I see nothing wrong with civilians owning mil spec weapons. It's what 2a was for. I personally don't see the issue with it. And as sociopathic as it may seem it sucks these kids are shooting up schools but I don't think gun laws will change it. And more over I think these parents should get a few years for letting their kids get a hold of the rifle. If you can't afford the safe or the locks and use them you shouldn't be surprised when lil Jimmy shoots up the popular crowd.
Last edited:
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So if you murderously drove a Buick into a crowd of useful idiot kids who leave mounds of garbage behind when asking for their rights to be removed at a "gun protest" we should all gather guns and hunt down car manufacturers? Sounds legit.
SmokeyMcChokey
Well-Known Member
I do t think you can get a firsthand Buick anymore can you?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
That's cute. I'm really happy for you. Thanks again for your amazing opinion.
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Murdering crowds of people is an adaptation of a car’s use, mostly they are used to drive people around in. Guns primary function is to fire bullets, so let’s leave the Sean Hannity logic in the shitter where it belongs
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So you are in favor of having Police get rid of their guns and go in with feather dusters to stop a violent person ?
Or are you in favor of consolidating gun ownership in the hands of police, so they can use them to shoot pot growers dogs and other disobedient people?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I think Sean Hannity is a douche bag.
Speaking of flawed logic, you imply a guns sole purpose is to murder people. So you're fine with disarming police and military too? Will you use guns to do that or a Buick?
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
Not sure where that's coming from, but it's only partially accurate.
A car is not designed to take life. Quite the contrary, it's designed to save it. Seat belts, air bags, anti-lock brakes, automated avoidance systems and emergency stopping systems, and more have all been engineered for the sole purpose of saving human lives and preventing injuries.
To use it against it's designed purpose is a perversion of the individual, not the object itself.
Guns are designed for one purpose: to kill. By not only promoting putting guns designed to kill in the hands of criminals (which the NRA actively does by fighting any and all universal background checks) and by putting them into the hands of mentally disturbed people (which again they actively do by fighting any legislation to stop it) and by also actively seeking to kill children and have children killed both accidentally and intentionally (which they do by constantly fighting all safety features on guns and owner responsibility legislation), the NRA puts itself on the same level as the Taliban and other terrorist organizations.
The NRA's sole purpose is the death of American people of all ages and walks of life at any and all costs. It is the only thing they stand for and take an active part in. They are actually the textbook definition of a terrorist organization.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Actually guns can be used to deter murder or "killing" . Not to mention they can be used to "kill" targets or maim pot growers dogs or be used as the muscle behind threats to kill while enforcing a gun confiscation law.
So while they ARE capable of killing, that's not their only purpose. If you are a thief or a gun grabber and intend to harm a person would you rather seek out an unarmed victim or would you invade the home of a gun owner who might deter your murderous intent by being armed and who is willing to defend themselves?
You might benefit from a better understanding of using a weapon for offensive purposes, which is wrong, and using a gun for defensive purposes, which is no more wrong, but more effective, than defending yourself with a stick.
zeddd
Well-Known Member
I’m in favour of using reason and intelligence, your train of thought ends in “it’s ok for adults to rape children”
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
If you were in favor of using reasoning, you'd offer a rebuttal that isn't a circular argument.
I don't think it's okay to rape kids or to use them as stooges to advocate for using guns to "end gun violence" .
Intelligence eh? Okay, so who would have guns after your utopia comes into being and how would you enforce an anti-gun law, would you use spit balls or would you have somebody use guns ?
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Well I live in a country with very little gun crime, no guns no mass shootings since Hungerford, also very few pigs have guns because we know they are stupid fuks who would kill innocents. I’m already sad about the next mass shooting in the US it’s been a few weeks since the last big one, the little massacres hardly make the news these days
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
But the knives... The knives!!!!
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Pitchfork discount sales are the worry
So since we have guns now the police won't shoot pot growers dogs? A cop will shoot and kill your dog and you and will get away with regardless if he was wrong. Thats now, so it cant get much worse then your hypothesis .