Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
the poll being conducted by university of texas doesn't mean the results are from Austin, it does say it's representative of the state's demographics...
Is a reversal of Roe v Wade decision next?
- Thread starter CunningCanuk
- Start date
printer
Well-Known Member
Justice Thomas no longer teaching courses at George Washington following Roe backlash
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will no longer teach a constitutional law course he’s taught since 2011 at George Washington University, following his SCOTUS vote to overturn “Roe v. Wade” and subsequent calls for his removal from the school.
Last month, school officials reportedly rejected a petition with more than 11,000 signatures seeking to unseat Thomas from his professorial lecturer position, but an email obtained by the GWU student paper, The Hatchet, later said Thomas will be unavailable to teach the course.
Thomas is also no longer a listed lecturer in the GW Law School’s course catalog.
The Hill has reached out for comment from GW Law, Thomas and Gregory Maggs, who has co-taught the course with Thomas since it started.
The Justice has come under fire following his role in the 5-4 decision to overturn the right to abortion established in “Roe v. Wade” and “Planned Parenthood v. Casey.”
Thomas noted in his concurring opinion on “Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization” that the court should also reexamine precedent protecting the rights to contraception and to same-sex marriage.
Lawmakers have been scrambling in the wake of that opinion to protect marriage equality, and a House vote was called last week to try to protect contraception.
Thomas is also under scrutiny for the actions of his wife, Ginni Thomas, who attended the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally just before rioters stormed the capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and communicated with former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and and Trump attorney John Eastman about overturning the 2020 presidential election results.
Members of the House select committee investigating Jan. 6 riots have said Ginni Thomas may be called to testify.
thehill.com
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will no longer teach a constitutional law course he’s taught since 2011 at George Washington University, following his SCOTUS vote to overturn “Roe v. Wade” and subsequent calls for his removal from the school.
Last month, school officials reportedly rejected a petition with more than 11,000 signatures seeking to unseat Thomas from his professorial lecturer position, but an email obtained by the GWU student paper, The Hatchet, later said Thomas will be unavailable to teach the course.
Thomas is also no longer a listed lecturer in the GW Law School’s course catalog.
The Hill has reached out for comment from GW Law, Thomas and Gregory Maggs, who has co-taught the course with Thomas since it started.
The Justice has come under fire following his role in the 5-4 decision to overturn the right to abortion established in “Roe v. Wade” and “Planned Parenthood v. Casey.”
Thomas noted in his concurring opinion on “Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization” that the court should also reexamine precedent protecting the rights to contraception and to same-sex marriage.
Lawmakers have been scrambling in the wake of that opinion to protect marriage equality, and a House vote was called last week to try to protect contraception.
Thomas is also under scrutiny for the actions of his wife, Ginni Thomas, who attended the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally just before rioters stormed the capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and communicated with former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and and Trump attorney John Eastman about overturning the 2020 presidential election results.
Members of the House select committee investigating Jan. 6 riots have said Ginni Thomas may be called to testify.
Justice Thomas no longer teaching courses at George Washington following Roe backlash
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will no longer teach a constitutional law course he’s taught since 2011 at George Washington University (GWU) following his vote to overturn Roe v. Wade and su…
thehill.com
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
Well shit, how are all those right wing mega donors going to funnel him money now?Justice Thomas no longer teaching courses at George Washington following Roe backlash
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will no longer teach a constitutional law course he’s taught since 2011 at George Washington University, following his SCOTUS vote to overturn “Roe v. Wade” and subsequent calls for his removal from the school.
Last month, school officials reportedly rejected a petition with more than 11,000 signatures seeking to unseat Thomas from his professorial lecturer position, but an email obtained by the GWU student paper, The Hatchet, later said Thomas will be unavailable to teach the course.
Thomas is also no longer a listed lecturer in the GW Law School’s course catalog.
The Hill has reached out for comment from GW Law, Thomas and Gregory Maggs, who has co-taught the course with Thomas since it started.
The Justice has come under fire following his role in the 5-4 decision to overturn the right to abortion established in “Roe v. Wade” and “Planned Parenthood v. Casey.”
Thomas noted in his concurring opinion on “Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization” that the court should also reexamine precedent protecting the rights to contraception and to same-sex marriage.
Lawmakers have been scrambling in the wake of that opinion to protect marriage equality, and a House vote was called last week to try to protect contraception.
Thomas is also under scrutiny for the actions of his wife, Ginni Thomas, who attended the pro-Trump “Stop the Steal” rally just before rioters stormed the capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and communicated with former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and and Trump attorney John Eastman about overturning the 2020 presidential election results.
Members of the House select committee investigating Jan. 6 riots have said Ginni Thomas may be called to testify.
Justice Thomas no longer teaching courses at George Washington following Roe backlash
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas will no longer teach a constitutional law course he’s taught since 2011 at George Washington University (GWU) following his vote to overturn Roe v. Wade and su…
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
Venmo...it works for the other whores, ought to work for him
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Liberty for religious nut jobs, but no freedom for women, freedom to make war on others, but are protected from war themselves, because believing bullshit is more protected than believing the truth. Bullshit gets a tax break and science gets persecuted for speaking inconvenient truth.
There is a reason almost every liberal democratic judicial system thinks these clowns are fools and religious ideologs. Maybe some international human rights tribunal should indict him for violating the basic human rights of half the US population and the next time he goes to Europe, someone can put cuffs on him and on other such judges who violate basic human rights. He can pray about it in his cell in The Hague, Jesus loves martyrs and he can be one for his cause.
There is a reason almost every liberal democratic judicial system thinks these clowns are fools and religious ideologs. Maybe some international human rights tribunal should indict him for violating the basic human rights of half the US population and the next time he goes to Europe, someone can put cuffs on him and on other such judges who violate basic human rights. He can pray about it in his cell in The Hague, Jesus loves martyrs and he can be one for his cause.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
what do you expect the low life piece of lying shit to do? not defend his fucked up, archaic, fascist opinions?
wouldn't it be wonderful irony if some fucking psycho shot up the supreme court, on the day Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson decided not to come in?
America left with the liberal justices, and Biden has a year and a half to pick more...
and since im fantasizing, the democrats not only retain both houses, they gain enough seats to steamroller the republicunts...
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
here is a story being carried only by Fox and the hard right. The headline is designed to give good Christian white males something wholesome to which to masturbate.
nypost.com
Trans cheerleader kicked out of camp after allegedly choking teammate
Averie Chanel Medlock was kicked out of a Texas cheerleading camp and given a criminal citation after allegedly choking a teammate.
nypost.com
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I am sure they diligently cover every incident of a cheerleader getting kicked out of a camp for fighting though right?here is a story being carried only by Fox and the hard right. The headline is designed to give good Christian white males something wholesome to which to masturbate.
Trans cheerleader kicked out of camp after allegedly choking teammate
Averie Chanel Medlock was kicked out of a Texas cheerleading camp and given a criminal citation after allegedly choking a teammate.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
No. Only when they can imply that her victim was choking because yeah.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Do you think many modern women (that like to have fun) will go to shithole red state colleges with crazy abortion laws, places where they lose their basic human rights? There are gonna be a lot of sausage parties at these places, as even the home state girls opt out for a blue state education. Views on abortion rights are liberal and intense among a very high proportion of college women, much more so than among women in general. These guys will be whining about more than losing football games, many will be graduating as virgins from INCEL U
injinji
Well-Known Member
Lots of big business, not just football, will lose out because of the new laws. But football is something the red hat crowd care about. You get them thinking about it by sneaking the idea in the back door.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Well the republicans got hammered in the Kanas referendum on abortion real bad and are now gonna be in a panic cause momentum is still building on abortion rights. To lose this badly in red Kanas means the lunatic states are leading the republicans to disaster over abortion. Let's hope with Trump's trouble inside the party and J6 the democrats can pull off a miracle.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
The no pro abortion side had more people vote no that who showed up to vote in Kansas in 2014, that should scare the shit out of Mitch McConnell. Will the federal democrats introduce a liberal abortion law that the GOP can't swallow before the election and have them vote it down? Or will they just go with the threats the republicans made to women's rights and replay the video? Political earthquake in Kanas I'd say.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kornacki Shows How Deeply Anti-Abortion Rights Activists Lost In Kansas
66,414 views Aug 3, 2022 Kansas voters have rejected a constitutional amendment removing the right to abortion for the state constitution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kornacki Shows How Deeply Anti-Abortion Rights Activists Lost In Kansas
66,414 views Aug 3, 2022 Kansas voters have rejected a constitutional amendment removing the right to abortion for the state constitution.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
59% to 41% it must have some people thinking and others worrying.
Joe: No Doubt The Message From Kansas Reached Washington Last Night
34,589 views Aug 3, 2022 Kansas voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly struck down a proposed constitutional amendment that would remove language enshrining reproductive rights in their state, in a move widely seen as a victory for abortion rights activists.
Joe: No Doubt The Message From Kansas Reached Washington Last Night
34,589 views Aug 3, 2022 Kansas voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly struck down a proposed constitutional amendment that would remove language enshrining reproductive rights in their state, in a move widely seen as a victory for abortion rights activists.
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
i'm honestly a little surprised and disgusted that 41% voted for it...i thought the ratio of sensible caring people to callous assholes who don't give a fuck about other's rights was a little more 70-30...but a win is a win, and there will be a LOT more wins, all the way through the midterms...people are just fucking sick of being told what they can and can't do in their personal, private lives...and republicunts CAN'T quit trying to tell them exactly that....
TankHankerous
Well-Known Member
Why do some people love abortion? Its a selfish act that should be done in silence and great shame.
TankHankerous
Well-Known Member
Its not cool to make people that respect life to pay for those kind of "medical procedures"