can you please provide the prop wording that states those words word for word? This is what I read, section 1 Sub
(A) To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma, arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief. Since when are allergies, that the majority of American's suffer from an illness?
Since when does smoking relieve allergies? I'm all for compassionate laws, don't get me wrong. My point is the rest of us that want to gain decriminalization for all or our own compassion use laws are being held up by abuses in the 13 states that do have the laws. California is quickly becoming the farce of MMJ and this post was a perfect example. You want to claim that the Dr had personal knowledge of studies that MJ can relieve allergies? Bull Shit. I'll put my money on a script mill Dr that the poster found through asking around or word of mouth. regardless, I see it as an abuse.
Here in Florida, our Attorney General points to the abuses in California as to why we will never have compassion laws. I'm begininig to wonder who in Cali DOESN'T have a medical card?