Gun Lovers, You're Screwed.

mooray

Well-Known Member
Purist ideologies only function with pure people. Once people turn to shit, restrictions are put in place, freedom is reduced, and purist ideologies are no more. Every law represents a reduction of freedom and our failure of decency.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Purist ideologies only function with pure people. Once people turn to shit, restrictions are put in place, freedom is reduced, and purist ideologies are no more. Every law represents a reduction of freedom and our failure of decency.
i've tried to tell him that so fucking many times i just gave up. people are purely incapable of behaving themselves, most adults turn into irresponsible children at the slightest temptation or provocation, and he expects people to just cooperate with each other in this utopian fantasy land he inhabits...
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
i've tried to tell him that so fucking many times i just gave up. people are purely incapable of behaving themselves, most adults turn into irresponsible children at the slightest temptation or provocation, and he expects people to just cooperate with each other in this utopian fantasy land he inhabits...
Right, it's something you'd understand if it came from more of a campfire chat like, "you know why my utopia would be....", but instead it's pushed like it's something that can really happen.
 

Porky1982

Well-Known Member
No, when I come here I intentionally dumb it down, but no matter how hard I try the smart leaks out. Thanks for noticing. :lol:
So smart guy explain what Democide has to do with gun control please.
Feel free to dumb it down for us dullards Mr Mensa!!
 
Last edited:

Porky1982

Well-Known Member
You seem very intent on avoiding the question. I'll ask again, are you in favor of government backed gun control ?
What cracks me up with retarded gun lovers like yourself is the fact you think that if your government did want to disarm you by using guns that you and a few pissy little hand guns or shot guns or automatic guns that you own would stand a chance against trained police or the army.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i've tried to tell him that so fucking many times i just gave up. people are purely incapable of behaving themselves, most adults turn into irresponsible children at the slightest temptation or provocation, and he expects people to just cooperate with each other in this utopian fantasy land he inhabits...

If people are incapable of behaving themselves, why would you vote for a person to be your super daddy? Isn't consolidating all that power in the hands of a person going to enable an irresponsilbe person(s) to control you ?

Name the person capable of running your life better than you.
 

Porky1982

Well-Known Member
How is it enforced? Are guns used ?
Guns are carried by police yes but they rarely "use" them. By use I mean firing them.

I am in no way saying police should not be armed. I am saying ordinary citizens with self proclaimed high intelligence levels like your self should not be.
That's just my opinion and at the end of the day it don't mean much but it's quite obvious to the rest of the first world the availability of guns to ordinary citizens in the US is a disaster.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
What cracks me up with retarded gun lovers like yourself is the fact you think that if your government did want to disarm you by using guns that you and a few pissy little hand guns or shot guns or automatic guns that you own would stand a chance against trained police or the army.
I'm not a gun lover in the sense you attempt to portray me. I'm a lover of liberty and peace. and you are in love with your chains, slave.

Thanks for admitting that government uses guns to achive their goals of controlling people. I'm sorry you are so subservient.
 
Last edited:

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Guns are carried by police yes but they rarely "use" them. By use I mean firing them.

I am in no way saying police should not be armed. I am saying ordinary citizens with self proclaimed high intelligence levels like your self should not be.
That's just my opinion and at the end of the day it don't mean much but it's quite obvious to the rest of the first world the availability of guns to ordinary citizens in the US is a disaster.
You seem to like blanket guilt as a rationale. Is it possible for a person to be armed and also be peaceful ?

So do you propose police use guns to make sure you are disarmed ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Right, it's something you'd understand if it came from more of a campfire chat like, "you know why my utopia would be....", but instead it's pushed like it's something that can really happen.
I would not get a fire permit though.
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
What cracks me up with retarded gun lovers like yourself is the fact you think that if your government did want to disarm you by using guns that you and a few pissy little hand guns or shot guns or automatic guns that you own would stand a chance against trained police or the army.
If the government decides to come for your guns, even if you own a Sherman tank, you will be no match against a fleet of drones you don’t even know are there.
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
Law professor breaks down the 2nd amendment in less than 5 minutes.
If we’re going to talk about historical context, shouldn’t we also consider the fact that the Bill of Rights was written at a time when a musket was a super weapon.

An 18th century style revolutionary war would not be possible today.
 
Top