Exclusive: Democrats lose ground with millennials - Reuters/Ipsos poll

ttystikk said:

Again.

You're the one deluded into thinking there's a big difference between D and R. At least own it.

I don't want money in politics at all.

Click to expand...

So, you are going to vote Republican?

There is a big difference between Democrats and Republicans. In terms of access to health care, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Infrastructure, workers' rights, civil rights, the environment and the differences in policies and the legislation in Congress, the differences are stark. Only an entitled white man can say there is no difference. Do I have to pull up headlines from the spring of 2017 when Republicans were striving to repeal the ACA? How about their efforts to privatize Social Security? How about their pulling the US out of the Paris treaty to address climate change? The list goes on and on.

You don't want money in politics? Democrats support campaign finance reform and Republicans don't.

So, are you going to vote Republican?

Fogdog said:

So, you are going to vote Republican?

There is a big difference between Democrats and Republicans. In terms of access to health care, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Infrastructure, workers' rights, civil rights, the environment and the differences in policies and the legislation in Congress, the differences are stark. Only an entitled white man can say there is no difference. Do I have to pull up headlines from the spring of 2017 when Republicans were striving to repeal the ACA? How about their efforts to privatize Social Security? How about their pulling the US out of the Paris treaty to address climate change? The list goes on and on.

You don't want money in politics? Democrats support campaign finance reform and Republicans don't.

So, are you going to vote Republican?

Click to expand...

There is a valid point to be made though. It depends on one's perspective. What I think she is trying to convey is her radicalism. It does not matter if the Democrats have much closer views to the Progressives, both major parties are so totally, yesterday, man. Besides neither party can compete with them on the purity level. They have smoking guns, baby - get hip! The Democrats support the banksters, man. Both major parties are ballwashers!



I read it on the interwebs.

Unclebaldrick said:

There is a valid point to be made though. It depends on one's perspective. What I think she is trying to convey is her radicalism. It does not matter if the Democrats have much closer views to the Progressives, both major parties are so totally, yesterday, man. Besides neither party can compete with them on the purity level. They have smoking guns, baby - get hip! The Democrats support the banksters, man. Both major parties are ballwashers!

I read it on the interwebs.

Click to expand...

belief > facts

is horseshit.

I don't care if you put a black bra on it.

It's still horseshit.

Fogdog said:

Only entitled white people can be so blithe about two more years of a Republican controlled government.

Click to expand...

Try not to speak for other people, you absolute clown.

trippnface said:

Try not to speak for other people, you absolute clown.

Click to expand...

post a youtube video, far right wing jew hater

trippnface said:

Try not to speak for other people, you absolute clown.

Click to expand...

I was talking about people in the US when I said the only entitled white people could be blithe about two more years of Republican control of government.

Russia has a dictator for life and plenty of white people are fine with that. Would you care to shed some light on why so many Russians are happy to live under an oppressive government like they have in Russia?

Fogdog said:

Click to expand...

Fogdog said:

They don't know a thing about Tillemann. Just that he's running against "establishment Democrats" and crying like a bitch because those same establishment Democrats think he's a moron.

But they be like: Oooooh a Progressive. We like him.

Click to expand...

@UncleBuck so proud of his spawn..

schuylaar said:

@UncleBuck so proud of his spawn..

Click to expand...

What's so great about Tillemann that Cult of Sanders people would sacrifice their principle that campaigns for Democrats should run on air and demand money from the DCCC satan?

Padawanbater2 said:

Why does the DCCC try to influence the race before the voters have had a chance to choose the best candidate they feel can defeat the Republican?

Shouldn't the voters choose the candidate, then the DCCC put their financial backing behind him/her? Why have they backed the corporate friendly candidate in every race against the actual progressive?

It is good, though, that you've finally admitted corporate collusion within the Democratic party establishment. Went from "it's not happening!" to "they're allowed to do it" in no time flat

Click to expand...

Could you please explain what makes Crow the corporate friendly candidate? He has forsworn contributions from corporate PACS and contributions from corporations, in case you didn't know.

What's so great about Tillemann that Cult of Sanders people would sacrifice their principle that campaigns for Democrats should run on air and demand money from the DCCC satan?

From what I've read, the DCCC is stepping in to side with candidates with the best chances to win in the fall. This is what was said in the Washington Post:

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has thrown its weight in the race behind Jason Crow, an attorney and veteran running a more center-left campaign than Tillemann, who supports universal Medicare and other planks of Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) campaign platform. In the December conversation, Hoyer told Tillemann that “a decision was made early on by the Colorado delegation” to back Crow, and that it would continue to do so.

For example, the DCCC thinks (as I do) that shoring up the ACA is politically more acceptable to voters in districts that Democrats need to flip. The same for other policies that I like in concept but don't think will win in less than liberal districts center.

They are basically giving Sanders and you the cold shoulder. Makes sense to me.

Nothing to see here folks this does not fit the liberal narrative again nothing to see here folks....

Terps said:

Nothing to see here folks this does not fit the liberal narrative again nothing to see here folks....

Click to expand...

Hey, good to see you again.

I was wondering how you feel about the idea of people being forced from health care plans they like and into Medicaid?

Fogdog said:

Hey, good to see you again.

I was just thinking about you. I'd like to know who is going to be indicted next and how is that draining the swamp going?

Click to expand...

I'm gonna say no one having indicted those 13 Russian firms really bit Muller in the ass. He never expected for one of them to show up and plead not guilty. Now he has to turn over everything and be subject to discovery that is something he does not wanna do.

Terps said:

I'm gonna say no one having indicted those 13 Russian firms really bit Muller in the ass. He never expected for one of them to show up and plead not guilty. Now he has to turn over everything and be subject to discovery that is something he does not wanna do.

Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah, I realized after sending my post that you've already answered it before. Sorry about making you repeat yourself.

OK, so, a different question: I was wondering how you feel about the idea of people being forced from health care plans they like and into Medicaid?

Terps said:

I'm gonna say no one having indicted those 13 Russian firms really bit Muller in the ass. He never expected for one of them to show up and plead not guilty. Now he has to turn over everything and be subject to discovery that is something he does not wanna do.

Click to expand...

Jesus, kid, everything you said in your shit post is wrong.

It isn't 13 firms it's 3.

They didn't know if someone representing Concord would show up, because Concord wouldn't even acknowledge getting the summons.

Previous attempts to get the Russian government to help deliver the summons to Saint Petersburg-based Concord Management have failed.

Prosecutors on Friday told the judge overseeing the case that Eric Dubelier, the lawyer for Concord, has refused to confirm whether Concord has been served with a summons.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/putin-s-economic-ambitions-for-new-term-held-hostage-by-tensions

If you have inside information about why the Trump appointee Judge Dabney Friedrich ruling on Saturday, that denied prosecutors request to postpone the Wednesday arraignment, now means the government has to turn over the whole of it's case, before the actual fucking arraignment, I'd love to hear it.

travisw said:

Jesus, kid, everything you said in your shit post is wrong.

It isn't 13 firms it's 3.

They didn't know if someone representing Concord would show up, because Concord wouldn't even acknowledge getting the summons.

Previous attempts to get the Russian government to help deliver the summons to Saint Petersburg-based Concord Management have failed.

Prosecutors on Friday told the judge overseeing the case that Eric Dubelier, the lawyer for Concord, has refused to confirm whether Concord has been served with a summons.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-07/putin-s-economic-ambitions-for-new-term-held-hostage-by-tensions

If you have inside information about why the Trump appointee Judge Dabney Friedrich ruling on Saturday, that denied prosecutors request to postpone the Wednesday arraignment, now means the government has to turn over the whole of it's case, before the actual fucking arraignment, I'd love to hear it.

Click to expand...

Vice attempt to try and deflect ........

Terps said:

Vice attempt to try and deflect ........

Click to expand...

I was wondering how you feel about the idea of people being forced from health care plans they like and into Medicaid?

I think there is a huge difference between health insurance and having access to health care. Emergency room regardedless If you have health insurance if you're hurt and they will help you that is health care. Health insurance needs to be left to the open market. Any time the government tries to get involved it just goes to The toilet Even more so with health care. I mean did you see that krapp in the UK that poor baby was still semi conscious and the government literally made him starve to death the parents had no choice but to sit there and watch. So yeah I'm not for government Backed insurance at all. Providing Access to health care For the less fortunate I'm all for. Asking people to pay additional taxes to pay for it I'm not.

Terps said:

I think there is a huge difference between health insurance and having access to health care. Emergency room regardedless If you have health insurance if you're hurt and they will help you that is health care. Health insurance needs to be left to the open market. Any time the government tries to get involved it just goes to The toilet Even more so with health care. I mean did you see that krapp in the UK that poor baby was still semi conscious and the government literally made him starve to death the parents had no choice but to sit there and watch. So yeah I'm not for government Backed insurance at all. Providing Access to health care For the less fortunate I'm all for. Asking people to pay additional taxes to pay for it I'm not.

Click to expand...

that response is just silly.
you have access to buy a porsche turbo, right? can you afford one, no. see the difference?

rkymtnman said:

that response is just silly.
you have access to buy a porsche turbo, right? can you afford one, no. see the difference?

Click to expand...

No the big differences when you go to the emergency room they're not allowed to say no the porche dealer will call the cops and have your dumb-ass arrested. I see the difference you're a sheep