Exclusive: Democrats lose ground with millennials - Reuters/Ipsos poll

SneekyNinja said:
He keeps calling me stupid...

He's unemployed/unemployable, is pathetic in his desperate search for a woman and seems to never contribute anything of value to anything at all.

I do highly technical work and get paid so much I just took like a quarter of the year off for vacation, yet I'm somehow the "stupid" one.

It'd be funny if he wasn't such a pathetic example of a human being.
Click to expand...

What’s pathetic is, that you are a lonely loser who is a braggart.
 
see4 said:
If you were an employer, and you had an employee that wasn't working out, would you continue to pay them?
Click to expand...

Nope.

I’d build a case against them through HR (employers bestie) then fire them and fight the SUI.

But the issue with that is..depending on employers current SUI rate in the state employee resides, tells a story.

I happened to have a conversation with one and was told flat out they know employers are liars..the higher (SUI rate), the liar.

Cheers to all you shitty employers out there, they KNOW:wink:

Documentation is key and if you have an employee handbook that’s not legally reviewed you will automatically lose your case if it goes to judge.

I’ll never understand why employers think they can just download a copy they find online and use it.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
We will no longer be able to use the term Progressive to describe a liberal who supports social progress
Click to expand...

Excuse you?

You are not progressive.

Not sure what year you think it is.

Progressive and Neoliberal are 2 different things.

WHEN will you understand this?
 
srh88 said:
That answer was terrible
Click to expand...
They don't know a thing about Tillemann. Just that he's running against "establishment Democrats" and crying like a bitch because those same establishment Democrats think he's a moron.

But they be like: Oooooh a Progressive. We like him.
images
 
abandonconflict said:
Give us Bernie or we'll give you Trump!

Now THAT'S Progressive!
Click to expand...
fify

Only entitled white people can be so blithe about two more years of a Republican controlled government.
SneekyNinja said:
I'm not the one that spends all my time here, flapjacks.

Your slave master called me stupid, so I referenced my academics and how I apply them to the real world and do well out of it, thus disproving his assertion.

If you want to take that as bragging, well you do you (aka be retarded).
Click to expand...
tty went so far as to criticize me for knowing something about a subject on which he had posted an article and he knew nothing about.

These guys are all hot about a candidate simply because he says establishment Democrats won't support him. The more I find out about The Cult of Sanders more repelling the become. The Cult of Ignorance.
 
Fogdog said:
They whine about the hated establishment yet demand the establishment funds their campaigns.
Click to expand...
No, they support the voters of the district choosing the candidate. The DCCC chooses which candidate will be better on corporate issues, since their main source of funding comes from corporations
Fogdog said:
"Hoyer isn't pressuring Tilleman to vacate the race because he believes Crow is the better candidate"
Click to expand...
Fogdog said:
your statement I quoted above is contrary to what he said
Click to expand...
...you don't say...

Hoyer said a decision was made that he wasn't part of that took place well before the primary when voters would have a chance to vote, on which candidate the party would support. A decision was made which candidate the Democratic establishment would back. Why was that decision made when that decision is supposed to be left to the voters? Then the Democratic establishment is supposed to back the candidate the voters chose. Not the other way around. You effectively support subverting democracy and who the Democratic voters actually choose to represent them in favor of the pick of the party elites. A small group of people who have been consistently wrong for a decade
Fogdog said:
What's so great about Tillemann
Click to expand...
Everything
 
Padawanbater2 said:
No, they support the voters of the district choosing the candidate. The DCCC chooses which candidate will be better on corporate issues, since their main source of funding comes from corporations


...you don't say...

Hoyer said a decision was made that he wasn't part of that took place well before the primary when voters would have a chance to vote, on which candidate the party would support. A decision was made which candidate the Democratic establishment would back. Why was that decision made when that decision is supposed to be left to the voters? Then the Democratic establishment is supposed to back the candidate the voters chose. Not the other way around. You effectively support subverting democracy and who the Democratic voters actually choose to represent them in favor of the pick of the party elites. A small group of people who have been consistently wrong for a decade

Everything
Click to expand...
It's okay if Democrats and Republicans since the Democratic process as long as THEIR team wins.

Wins what? The right to screw over the American People for the next 2, 4 or even 6 years?

These guys who see nothing wrong are like fish; they swim in so much corruption they don't even see it.
 
Padawanbater2 said:
No, they support the voters of the district choosing the candidate. The DCCC chooses which candidate will be better on corporate issues, since their main source of funding comes from corporations


...you don't say...

Hoyer said a decision was made that he wasn't part of that took place well before the primary when voters would have a chance to vote, on which candidate the party would support. A decision was made which candidate the Democratic establishment would back. Why was that decision made when that decision is supposed to be left to the voters? Then the Democratic establishment is supposed to back the candidate the voters chose. Not the other way around. You effectively support subverting democracy and who the Democratic voters actually choose to represent them in favor of the pick of the party elites. A small group of people who have been consistently wrong for a decade

Everything
Click to expand...
LOL. You want it both ways. You complain about the DCCC's source of funding and then you complain that Tillemann is at a disadvantage because he's not receiving any of it. What if he accepts that evil but legal corporate money from the DCCC? Would it be OK with you because he's on your team? Your logic is so flawed that your argument falls apart after the second sentence in your post.

The primary is in June. If Tillemann wins, the DCCC will back him. Until then, he's on his own. Why aren't you Sanders cultists not supporting him and expecting the DCCC to?

I don't think he will win but I don't know much about either candidate. I do know that the Sierra Club chose to back Crow. Probably because they think Tillemann is a loser too. I'm just guessing though. Unlike you, I don't claim to know what other people are thinking.

You haven't told me what's so great about Tillemann. Why are you so worked up about somebody you don't have a clue about?
 
Fogdog said:
LOL. You want it both ways. You complain about the DCCC's source of funding and then you complain that Tillemann is at a disadvantage because he's not receiving any of it. What if he accepts that evil but legal corporate money from the DCCC? Would it be OK with you because he's on your team? Your logic is so flawed that your argument falls apart after the second sentence in your post.

The primary is in June. If Tillemann wins, the DCCC will back him. Until then, he's on his own. Why aren't you Sanders cultists not supporting him and expecting the DCCC to?

I don't think he will win but I don't know much about either candidate. I do know that the Sierra Club chose to back Crow. Probably because they think Tillemann is a loser too. I'm just guessing though. Unlike you, I don't claim to know what other people are thinking.

You haven't told me what's so great about Tillemann. Why are you so worked up about somebody you don't have a clue about?
Click to expand...
You aren't paying attention.

We don't want the DCCC to have one thin dime to spend on any candidate, as the entire organization is antidemocratic precisely because they use money to subvert the will of the voters. That goes for corporate contributions, SuperPACs and all the rest of it.

It's ALL corrupt, yet you keep trying to pick and choose.
 
ttystikk said:
You aren't paying attention.

We don't want the DCCC to have one thin dime to spend on any candidate, as the entire organization is antidemocratic precisely because they use money to subvert the will of the voters. That goes for corporate contributions, SuperPACs and all the rest of it.

It's ALL corrupt, yet you keep trying to pick and choose.
Click to expand...
It's you who are picking and choosing. You complain that DCCC campaign money is tipping the primary toward Crow. Campaigns that spend the most usually win. You and I agree on this. I want Democratic Party candidates and campaigns to be able to compete against well funded Republican campaigns. Under today's laws that means Super PACS, Union PACs, the Sierra Club, Corporate and wealthy donor money too.

You say you don't want the DCCC to have a war chest to oppose Republicans, you don't want SuperPacs or any source of campaign cash to enable Democrats to oppose Republicans. Republicans are most certainly going to have campaign financing from all those sources.

We agree that campaigns that spend the most usually win.

The result of your scenario is another round of success for Republicans.
 
ttystikk said:
It's okay if Democrats and Republicans since the Democratic process as long as THEIR team wins.

Wins what? The right to screw over the American People for the next 2, 4 or even 6 years?

These guys who see nothing wrong are like fish; they swim in so much corruption they don't even see it.
Click to expand...
I haven't heard a word about what makes Tillemann a better candidiate than Crow. You Sanders Cultists don't know. Yet you are hot for him because he's on your team.

How do you know Tillemann is not corrupt?

Seems he plays a bit fast and loose to the point of breaking campaign laws.

https://coloradopolitics.com/compla...d-testing-waters-exploring-congressional-run/
Complaint charges Democrat Levi Tillemann went beyond ‘testing the waters’ while exploring congressional run

I'm not defending Crow here, I don't really have an oar in this water. My Congressman is running unopposed in the primary in Oregon. I simply don't understand your "Team" argument. I haven't heard a peep from you cultists about why Tillemann is better than Crow. You guys are piling on for Tillemann simply because he says he's on TEAM Progressive (aka Team Cult of Sanders)
 
Fogdog said:
It's you who are picking and choosing. You complain that DCCC campaign money is tipping the primary toward Crow. Campaigns that spend the most usually win. You and I agree on this. I want Democratic Party candidates and campaigns to be able to compete against well funded Republican campaigns. Under today's laws that means Super PACS, Union PACs, the Sierra Club, Corporate and wealthy donor money too.

You say you don't want the DCCC to have a war chest to oppose Republicans, you don't want SuperPacs or any source of campaign cash to enable Democrats to oppose Republicans. Republicans are most certainly going to have campaign financing from all those sources.

We agree that campaigns that spend the most usually win.

The result of your scenario is another round of success for Republicans.
Click to expand...
Again.

You're the one deluded into thinking there's a big difference between D and R. At least own it.

I don't want money in politics at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top