V256.420
Well-Known Member
This got me interested. How large are we talking here?
Eliminating Free Speech The Smart Way
- Thread starter squarepush3r
- Start date
Obepawn
Well-Known Member
With that said, free speech has a price, sometimes, a physical price.
medviper
Well-Known Member
like those freedom loving folks at trump rally's caught on camera threatening the reporters and the medias coverage ?
Obepawn
Well-Known Member
And the black guy who protesting at his rally, and got punched in the mouth.
medviper
Well-Known Member
they cant debate, so they resort to assault with either their fist or a speeding vehicle.
Obepawn
Well-Known Member
On top of this, Trump encouraged violence at his rallies. And there was the white guy last year who was at one of his rallies and made incredulous facial expressions when Trump spouted out one of many lies. The camera caught this, next thing you know he was escorted out of the rally. So, Republicans turds, don’t be crying about free speech being taken away by the left.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
So assange is great but you complain when we talk about your personal information without your permission?
LOL
medviper
Well-Known Member
how about a theme song for your enjoyment to complement such a thoughtful comment?Fuck Trump, Fuck Obama, Fuck Republicans, Fuck Democrats They always say the same shit, never do anything.. And fuck you if you want to take away free speech.
The snowflake generation is pathetic, your hurt feelings not as important as my rights.
radiant Rudy
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Thank you for conceding my point.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
assange stole people's personal information and then disseminated it in the most unverifiable and damaging way he possibly could. you celebrate him.
and yet you complain when we simply google your username.
are these consistent responses?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
That's not at all what he did and you know it.
He published information that was given to him. That's called journalism.
If you think differently, you've become the literal definition of a fascist who thinks total government control of information is desirable.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
this is where i'd usually ask the assange defender to give me all their personal information so i can publish it in the most damaging way possible, slipping in some really really embarrassing falsehoods in there (all good since none of it is even verifiable anyway), but we already now all about you, mr. woman-beating lowlife pimp
i think personal information should remain personal. i do make some exceptions to this rule, like for nazis and really fucking annoying people like finshaggy. or you.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Assange released material that was classified because America does not want to be held accountable for what it does around the world.
That's not national security, that's political security.
Your transparent attempt to conflate personal information with evidence of a country's war crimes just proves that you're a fascist wannabe.
What's next, a MAGA hat?
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i'd consider john podesta's rissoto recipe to be personal information. stolen from him by russian spies and published without his permission by julian assange
like i said, this is where i would ask if you're cool with me stealing your personal information and publishing it without your permission, but ya know...pimping women across wyoming and all.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
So THIS is your justification for throwing the first amendment down the drain?
Have another drink.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i don't think the first amendment allows russian spies to steal your personal information so that julian assange can wield it against you without your permission in order to help out a foreign dictator who murders gay people and journalists
do you think that's what the first amendment allows?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
you missed the point
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
The black guy forgave him