D619
Well-Known Member
all I can do is laugh when I read this. Thanks.
DC Shooter and Obama Care?
- Thread starter Sand4x105
- Start date
D619
Well-Known Member
Australian citizens do not (and never did) have a constitutional right to own firearms — even before the 1997 buyback program, handgun ownership in Australia was restricted to certain groups, such as those needing weapons for occupational reasons, members of approved sporting clubs, hunters, and collectors. Moreover, the 1997 buyback program did not take away all the guns owned by these groups; only some types of firearms (primarily semi-automatic and pump-action weapons) were banned. And even with the ban in effect, those who can demonstrate a legitimate need to possess prohibited categories of firearms can petition for exemptions from the law.
Figure out the rest Brainiac!
Figure out the rest Brainiac!
Red1966
Well-Known Member
He sends a message to "asshat" and you reply. lol.....
PiElandAZ
New Member
Then the SCROTUS is wrong ... WE THE PEOPLE need to get our shit together now.
El Tiberon
Active Member
Perhaps more of you will meet the same fate if the world is lucky enough. Enjoy your guns.
who? the members that are subjected to pages of others' thoughts that were copied and pasted..copy and paste shows lack of effort and thought..can't manage thoughts of your own?..post a link, like everyone else..no one will read it, but then again, no one will read your cut and paste either however, you'll look less of an assclown..
is said posting..before or after the fact?
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Hey Schuylaar,
It was before, that tidbit was wore out after the shooting. It's a policy of the that chain all over the country. Some people speculated that's why he chose the place, it was the only gun free zone within a 20 mile radius. I disagree with that theory, I don't think crazy people care about those things.
My only point was lives may have been saved if were it not gun free, but I'll admit it's not a definite. I won't subscribe to a shootout like the OK corral occurring. I don't know why anti-gun people think that's what would have happened. There is no precedent to base that belief on.
A history lesson on prohibition should tell us that a ban on weapons would increase crime. It SHOULD tell us that, but for some reason people think a prohibition on firearms would work when no other prohibition has.
It was before, that tidbit was wore out after the shooting. It's a policy of the that chain all over the country. Some people speculated that's why he chose the place, it was the only gun free zone within a 20 mile radius. I disagree with that theory, I don't think crazy people care about those things.
My only point was lives may have been saved if were it not gun free, but I'll admit it's not a definite. I won't subscribe to a shootout like the OK corral occurring. I don't know why anti-gun people think that's what would have happened. There is no precedent to base that belief on.
A history lesson on prohibition should tell us that a ban on weapons would increase crime. It SHOULD tell us that, but for some reason people think a prohibition on firearms would work when no other prohibition has.
tasers for all will get the job done..
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Convince me we can do this and I'm on board. Why will prohibition have positive outcomes THIS time?
Any gun measure that doesn't involve hand guns is just fluff. Over 99% of murders with guns are committed with hand guns. How can a handgun ban prevent the bad guys and idiots from still having them?
and what percentage of those murders are committed by the gunowners themselves?..we need a chart..Bucky?
kelly4
Well-Known Member
For the same reason your chickens feel dirty and used.
D619
Well-Known Member
You read it! By the way calling me an assclown makes you look like an ass. But hey, I live in Southern Cal, so we can discuss this in Person.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
If you are trying to argue we need to ban guns so people won't get guns that don't belong to them, you need to reassess that line of thought. How does this work?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no SCOTUS has ever, nor will ever, give an absolutist interpretation of the second.
go cry somewhere.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
oh, hey, look at this.
mr. copy and paste went to wikipedia and is regurgitating their page here.
so are you gonna tell me about gun massacres in australia, or just repeat the wikipedia page, old sport?
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
Do you understand how close you have to get to successfully use a taser?
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
We could do our own testing and use Bucky as the test subject.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
