Closing threads
- Thread starter Red1966
- Start date
- Status
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i take full credit for this.
very recently, several members: echelon1k1, gagekko, slavenomore, nietzschekeen, and shotgun420, have all come out as very proud holocaust deniers.
that puts them in a special category of horrible human beings.
i agree.
that is all courtesy of you mercilessly calling carne a 'gold digger' after he shared a story of how his spouse was murdered, among other choice things you have said to me. you're not innocent, although the recent arrival of the tacoburrito group has mellowed my trolling of you. you even noticed that in this very thread.
echelon1k1
New Member
Image what type of person would justify war crimes based on a religious belief including the systematic rape, torture and murder of an entire population?
But "war is hell and might is right"... You wouldn't be mistaken in thinking such a person supporting & justifying those kinds of atrocities could be rightly labelled a nazi and would make hitler himself burst with joy
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you spammed the same nonsense 4 minutes ago in the "IRS scandal" thread, a thread in which you said absolutely NOTHING about the OP.
for some reason, you took it upon yourself to spam the exact same "you are hitler, murder rape torture jew jew jew jew jew" diatribe here.
you are what the very ting that is wrong with this section recently. just chill out, you bitter, bitter creature.
echelon1k1
New Member
I never said that... I did assert only "horrible human beings" would support and justifying war crimes based on a religious belief... Again, all context is lost...
edits are never the way to go people are more pissed off when their posts are edited rather than deleted.
I wasn't suggesting "MOD" edit..
. What I was alluding to was the "TROLL"(during heated exchange) will actually post just long enough for "TARGETED VICTIM" to see post (and others) then "EDIT" quickly so they can't be caught..someone did this to me and I called him out on it, to which he acknowledged his specific intent to do so..was really proud of himself, too.
I wasn't suggesting "MOD" edit..
ah gotcha yeah now i know whart you mean kron did all the time i would copy and paste his shit so fast and post it back up in my post since he would do that ot make himself look like a sweetheart when he wasnt
Right? This one was quick and changed it before I could copy paste..but, NEXT time..oh yeeeeeeeeah.
So, my point is that things can be way more inflammatory than mod thinks or sees because of this SNEEKY editing.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Right? This one was quick and changed it before I could copy paste..but, NEXT time..oh yeeeeeeeeah.
So, my point is that things can be way more inflammatory than mod thinks or sees because of this SNEEKY editing.
When I practically lived on RIU, I'd see it happen. Now most of the time I am playing catch-up. That is one of the things actually inducing me to close threads ... it's the tool of discipline that remains to me. A parent will generally assess a lighter punishment to a peccadillo nipped in the bud as opposed to one that said parent has to read from the sometimes literal trail of breadcrumbs after, say, going to get groceries. cn
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
The threads that get locked will almost always have the same 3 or 4 people spouting the same bs over and over. We all recognize it for what it is and yes, it greatly diminishes the quality of thread, making some unreadable. It's the same insults lobbed back and forth over and over and over. When I see discourse turn into cries of racism.... every time, I know it's just a feeble minded person who can't debate. Knowing this doesn't make it anymore palatable to sift through.
I too am in favor of temporary bans to those who repeatedly roll in the mud instead of locking threads if we members have a vote. Although I believe this would just result in multi-accounts, so it's not a great answer either. This forum hasn't been very fun or challenging lately. It seems to have devolved into name calling instead of debate. I don't come around as much because of this so I'm torn. I'm not a fan of locking threads, but those threads definitely bring down the value of the neighborhood
I'm glad I'm not a mod, no easy answer here. If we were to allow an anything goes, people here have shown that a handful will ruin it for everyone else. I don't take it seriously so I'm not offended, I'm just bored by it.
Red takes as much abuse from the usuals as anyone from what I've seen, and yet is the biggest proponent of live and let live on the forum. He deserves credit for that at least. He's fighting for your right to post fake stormfront red posts at his expense, much respect.
I've skimmed over some truly racist posts recently, but calling them out has lost any credibility when every argument turns into charges of racism.
I too am in favor of temporary bans to those who repeatedly roll in the mud instead of locking threads if we members have a vote. Although I believe this would just result in multi-accounts, so it's not a great answer either. This forum hasn't been very fun or challenging lately. It seems to have devolved into name calling instead of debate. I don't come around as much because of this so I'm torn. I'm not a fan of locking threads, but those threads definitely bring down the value of the neighborhood
I'm glad I'm not a mod, no easy answer here. If we were to allow an anything goes, people here have shown that a handful will ruin it for everyone else. I don't take it seriously so I'm not offended, I'm just bored by it.
Red takes as much abuse from the usuals as anyone from what I've seen, and yet is the biggest proponent of live and let live on the forum. He deserves credit for that at least. He's fighting for your right to post fake stormfront red posts at his expense, much respect.
I've skimmed over some truly racist posts recently, but calling them out has lost any credibility when every argument turns into charges of racism.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Just hit "reply with quote".I wasn't suggesting "MOD" edit..
Other people can't edit quotes.
- Status