I know this is not the thread for this but I love all of ya!
View attachment 4580300View attachment 4580299
That would probably help to build some accountability from within. The problem of course is that it also punishes the good with the bad. Not that I'm totally against it either, just that it's what it would do.
I'd do the libertarian solution. I rarely suggest any type of law but I would in this case.
Police officers should be forced to carry liability insurance paid by them or the police department. If they harm someone through either negligence or intentionally, violate their human rights, etc. it pays out BIG TIME, payouts would have be to set very high. They would still of course be punished for any crime they committed.
Officers like him would be liabilities because they would cost departments too much money to employ. Insurance companies never want to pay out but at the same time they know it's easier to jack up the cost of insurance, rather than fight cases in court. This is why they like to look at individual records like our credit scores, health history, and driving records, etc. before we get insurance. Instead of a credit score All cops would by law, get an individual policing score, if they look like they are at risk of costing the insurance company millions, they will charge them accordingly.
A guy like him would have cost way too much to have been employable, just a quick look at his record tells me that few insurance company would have insured and if they did it would have cost more than his salary.