Kassiopeija
Well-Known Member
The US wasnt fit to jump into Europe until Hitler was already defeated in the East and in retreat. When it happened the US faced almost 0 resistance but that move was done to prevent the red army from totally overrunning Ger. In the aftermath the Russians felt greatly betrayed because of their enormous losses they had, which significantly weakened their evolution. Not so much with the US that had risen from a crippled economy after the great depression into a state where basically half of Europe was in debt to them for providing weapons.Stalin is dead and his intentions are a matter of historical fact. I'm Canadian and we were at war a week after the UK in 1939. American industry was geared up for war since the late1930's when European arms orders flowed in. Stalin murdered most of his top military officers and it was only post WW2 when he had the mighty red army at his command that such things became possible. Pre WW2 Finland defeated the Red army FFS, it was the German attack that really created the red army, but not before massive losses of men and territory. Churchill knew of Stalin's post war ambitions, Roosevelt not so much, Truman was a fast learner.
Though I digress, I really don't really see the validity of your comparison of Stalin & Putin. Or the fear-mongering of a nuclear strike.
If Putin wants to cause a nuclear winter and senseless destruction he right now has all opportunity to strike Ukraine nuclear reactors & claim innocence via 'friendly fire' or so....
But usually a person aiming to set nukes free don't announce it in press beforeahead lol you think he is so simple?
It's a threat - to keep the West from interveining - so he gets what he wants - power, influence & lands back in Ukraine.
He hardly would gain an official russian legitimisation to invade Poland etc