me personally i would rather grow f-1 unstable crosses of two great strains pick the phenos i like and go from there than get some 'stabilized' strain thats 10 years old and outdated and weak compared to the newest and greatest. i really find this stable strain thing amusing as some of the best seeds come from genetically different crosses with hybrid vigor not from inbred 'stable' strains which simply means more or less one phenotype. i backcross myself and inbreed for traits but the result is not a better strain so much as predictable growth and phenos but you lose stress resistance and vigor often so there is no one way that is better or more worthwile. stabilizing a strain takes time and space but that does not mean automatically that it is better than a random cross of two different plants.[/QUOTE} im not going to pretend im hip im not,and im not the latest fad kind of guy,i spent a lot of my life working 7/12 in 40 below in bush camps,so maybe im out dated and not hip to the new sensations,but i dont think it is wrong for a breeder to work on a phenomomnal strain,and keep its eunique genetic qualities stable.Someone asked about were to find weed that makes you laugh,now i never been a laughing kind a guy,sad but true,but i have had some weed that busted my gut,ya it was far and few of it,but i respect that breeder who finds that eunique phenoe and goes to work to stableize it.i had a bubble gum plant that i never kept going,i let it go over a clone only super strain,well that bubblegum had such a sweet euphoric high with no heart race no paranoia,just a soaring happy to be a live tingly toes high.now i would take that all week long then throw dice as to what the buzz is like,or looking for that next new thing,yes the grass is always greener on the other side.And im not against unstable genetics,im just telling what i think they are worth of my money,and whether i concider it breeding,that is all.im not against subcools way or the label of being the hip new sensation,in with the new and out with the old,or cleaning out the old gaurd at the spambis cup.i just dont buy it,others are free too.but you can get or make those same genetics for 1/2 the price.and do i want the next seed revolution to be about unstable hybrids across the board,not me.and not everyone wants to find one keeper.a lot of growers want to plant their seeds and harvest at about the same time and have some type of concistincy.then next year try another pack of a diffearant strain etc,etc.do you think dj is lesser of a breeder,is his way outdated,is sam the skunkmans work never to be done again,is the breeder who stablized the sweet pink grapefruit history.How about the people who took the time to stableize sativas like reeferman,are those types done,is it all about f2,s with the chance of finding that next best thing.