Uses the actual Law as a source.Just to be realistic, how am I supposed to take a website called "Obamacare facts" seriously, when its clearly pro ACA and claims to contain facts but cites no sources?
Come on Chesus, you have to do better than the teabaggers.
Yeah as a socialist I'm always on those right wing sites. I'm looking at the website, and no it does not cite the law. It has opinions about it, but no citations of any sort.Uses the actual Law as a source.
maybe you perfer to stick with rumors some right wing blogger starts?
Those arent opinionsYeah as a socialist I'm always on those right wing sites. I'm looking at the website, and no it does not cite the law. It has opinions about it, but no citations of any sort.
Are you really going to climb up my ass for pointing out you are doing exactly what the right wingers on this site do? Do you not realize these posts are a futile effort because they change exactly NO ONE's mind? Have you ever felt compelled to become a teabagger by reading Desert Douche's posts?Those arent opinions
Find something non factual and post a link rebutting what is posted there
Or are you just a blowhard?
NO i genuinely want you to find something you feel is non factual on that website and link to a source that proves your assertion.Are you really going to climb up my ass for pointing out you are doing exactly what the right wingers on this site do? Do you not realize these posts are a futile effort because they change exactly NO ONE's mind? Have you ever felt compelled to become a teabagger by reading Desert Douche's posts?
The only assertion I've made is that the website cites no sources for it's "facts", and is clearly pro- ACA, and that's not going to change anyone's mind.NO i genuinely want you to find something you feel is non factual on that website and link to a source that proves your assertion.
See unlike Desert Dude he usually either is talking out of his ass or got his info from far right propaganda mills
Again find something posted there as to "facts" that isnt in the PPACAThe only assertion I've made is that the website cites no sources for it's "facts", and is clearly pro- ACA, and that's not going to change anyone's mind.
Again find something posted there as to "facts" that isnt in the PPACA
Hey one paragraph answers two posts.Please point out the part where compliance is voluntary and people get to choose to participate or not. No wait.
In a credible source "facts" are cited for review and evaluation. There may be facts, it may be wholly factual, my point, which you keep avoiding, is that this site is not set up in a way that is going to convince anyone who is skeptical of the ACA otherwise.Again find something posted there as to "facts" that isnt in the PPACA
Yeah but rhetoric.In a credible source "facts" are cited for review and evaluation. There may be facts, it may be wholly factual, my point, which you keep avoiding, is that this site is not set up in a way that is going to convince anyone who is skeptical of the ACA otherwise.
People that are really concerned will look. People that are just partisan hacks from either side wontIn a credible source "facts" are cited for review and evaluation. There may be facts, it may be wholly factual, my point, which you keep avoiding, is that this site is not set up in a way that is going to convince anyone who is skeptical of the ACA otherwise.
Actually, I watched the latest episode of south park last night... S17E05 - Sums up obamacare quite well...
Well then what's the point of the post in the first place?People that are really concerned will look. People that are just partisan hacks from either side wont
Well then what's the point of the post in the first place?
Are you going to be honest and state your wife works for wellpoint? Or is that a inconvenient fact you'd like to forget considering the attacks the democrats have launched on them?