Obama steps on his dick again...

[desert dude]

[h=2]Uh, um, err, hmm, duh...

"In no uncertain terms and with no hedging, The New York Times reports that the Obama administration was aware of the fact that the IRS was targeting Tea Party groups as far back as June of 2012. The Treasury Department's Inspector General confirmed that he told senior Treasury officials in June of 2012, a full five months before Election Day:[/h]The first time President Obama was asked when he found out about the IRS scandal, he told the media that he learned of the news last Friday, the same way the rest of us did -- from the news media. "

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...Aware-of-IRS-Scandal-6-Months-before-Election

 

[Rak on Tur']

It drives me nuts that they never give names, it hurts the credibility of the accuser.

He might of known, he might not of. I haven't seen anyone held accountable, except some peon, and a guy who was already leaving so he got fired. Political leanings aside, I do not see how a single person can not want accountability in government. That is one of our biggest problems, in every department.

 

[GOD HERE]

Breitbart.com LOL. There's a source if I've ever seen one.

 

[desert dude]

Breitbart.com LOL. There's a source if I've ever seen one.

Yeah, and the New York Times. What rags.

 

[GOD HERE]

The New York Times is a paper that has a long history and retains its credibility. Breitbart.com is a conspiracy theorist political tabloid site with no objectivity or even journalists for that matter. This explains why you're such a misinformed nut.

 

[Red1966]

The New York Times is a paper that has a long history and retains its credibility. Breitbart.com is a conspiracy theorist political tabloid site with no objectivity or even journalists for that matter. This explains why you're such a misinformed nut.

Wow. Went right over your head. I somehow expected God to be smarter.

 

[GOD HERE]

Which explains why the New York Times was the source of the story. God, you are a moron.

My point was that you visit Breitbart in the first place, in case you missed it. You wonder why some people have such skewed views of current events, it's because they get their "news" from opinionated rather than objective sources. Opinion programming is for people who are too stupid to form their own opinion and need one given to them.

 

[desert dude]

My point was that you visit Breitbart in the first place, in case you missed it. You wonder why some people have such skewed views of current events, it's because they get their "news" from opinionated rather than objective sources. Opinion programming is for people who are too stupid to form their own opinion and need one given to them.

I also visit Slate and Huffpo. Heck, I even read Nation on occasion. My most common source of opinion journalism is reason.com, probably 95% of the time.

Anybody who retorts "lalalalalalala... faux news... lalalalala" is a useless tool. Giving Rachel Maddow a nightly hand job is no way to be a good citizen.

 

[cannabineer]

Wow. Went right over your head. I somehow expected God to be smarter.

Just look at God's family history ... falls a little shy of genius. cn

 

[GOD HERE]

I also visit Slate and Huffpo. Heck, I even read Nation on occasion. My most common source of opinion journalism is reason.com, probably 95% of the time.

Anybody who retorts "lalalalalalala... faux news... lalalalala" is a useless tool. Giving Rachel Maddow a nightly hand job is no way to be a good citizen.

Why? Can you not form an opinion after reading the facts? I could give two shits what any of the mouthpieces at Fox or MSNBC think. It's not journalism, it's propaganda and entertainment programming.

 

[echelon1k1]

My point was that you visit WIKI in the first place, in case you missed it. You wonder why some people have such skewed views of current events, it's because they get their "news" from opinionated rather than objective sources. Opinion programming is for people who are too stupid to form their own opinion and need one given to them.

Edited for accuracy.... Thankyou for proving my point...

 

[cannabineer]

How would you go about sorting fact (esp. the inconvenient sort) from cant? cn

 

[Doer]

Kant can't sort cant, but I can. While you can step on your own fingernails, I don't believe it is possible to actually trod upon ones own personal member......is it?

I can however through severe martial arts training, kick my own ass quite hard.

 

[desert dude]

Kant can't sort cant, but I can. While you can step on your own fingernails, I don't believe it is possible to actually trod upon ones own personal member......is it?

I can however through severe martial arts training, kick my own ass quite hard.

Duh! Obama is half African. The lower half. That is the one stereotype that has never been dismissed as "racism".

 

[UncleBuck]

this exact same thing was already posted elsewhere, yet the retarded OP starts yet another spam thread.

reported as spam.

 

[SlaveNoMore]

this exact same thing was already posted elsewhere, yet the retarded OP starts yet another spam thread.

reported as spam.

But you have to admit that desert dude and Doers lasts posts were funny as hell!! haaahaaaaa...I

 

[Murfy]

hey buck-

did that guy just say income tax is OPTIONAL?

i think he did.

 

[Murfy]

hopefully people find out-

i nominate you to be first to have entitlements revoked.

 

[UncleBuck]

hey buck-

did that guy just say income tax is OPTIONAL?

i think he did.

indiscriminate use-

of dash.

muffy, blueberry muffins.

the ocelot is in the den.

chair has three legs, and then a walnut.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

The New York Times is a paper that has a long history and retains its credibility.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA <breath> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH <wipes tears from eyes>

Thank you, I haven't laughed that hard in a while.