dispensaries no longer legal. fuck.

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Even if it was legalized, there would still be a market full of people who are too lazy/busy to grow their own. Those people would rather spend money then invest the time. Profit wouldn't be as high, but there would still be profit.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
ok, since a P can ONLY buy from his/her designated cg, then why dont ALL P get their C card? all 100% legal. and since a C can get meds from another C, its perfectly LEGAL.


no?
i been saying that for along time---no one should be 'just' a pt......everyone should be a CG connected thru the registry-

and there should be 'flash mobs ' in every co now ....where pts show up at 4:20 in mass burn some rope and then run--:joint:
 

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
Simple logic tells us that if a "product" is legal there will necessarily be a need for a legal market. If the SC were a responsible group they would have simply acknowledged this empirical fact and sent MMMA back to the legislature (aka ppl) to correct this GLARING error. But then again, legislating from the bench has become common practice in this country :(
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
The definite article in § 4(d) refers to the qualifying patient who is asserting § 4
immunity. Because the MMMA’s immunity provision contemplates that a registered qualifying
patient’s medical use of marijuana only occur for the purpose of alleviating his or her own
debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with that condition, and not another
patient’s condition or symptoms, § 4 does not authorize a registered qualifying patient to transfer
marijuana to another registered qualifying patient. Similarly, to be eligible for § 4 immunity, a
registered primary caregiver must be engaging in marijuana-related conduct for the purpose of
alleviating the debilitating medical condition, or symptoms associated with the medical
condition, of a registered qualifying patient to whom the caregiver is connected through the
registration process of Michigan’s Department of Community Health. Thus, § 4 does not offer
immunity to a registered primary caregiver who transfers marijuana to anyone other than a
registered qualifying patient to whom the caregiver is connected through the state’s registration
process. Defendants’ business facilitated patient-to-patient sales, but those transfers did not
qualify for § 4 immunity because they encompassed marijuana-related conduct that was not for
the purpose of alleviating the transferor’s debilitating medical condition or its symptoms.
Because defendants’ medical use of marijuana did not comply with the immunity provisions of
§§ 4(a), (b), and (d), defendants could not claim that § 4 insulated them from a public nuisance
claim.
3. Section 4(i) of the MMMA, MCL 333.26424(i), permits any person to assist a
registered qualifying patient with using or administering marijuana, but the terms “using” and
“administering” are limited to conduct involving the actual ingestion of marijuana. Section 4(i)
did not apply to defendants’ actions, which involved assisting patients with acquiring and
transferring marijuana.


I'm no lawyer, but the above seems to indicate that as a patient or caregiver you cannot transfer/sell to someone not directly registered to you, but you could potentially charge a "fee" for assisting a patient in the "use" or "ingestion" of marijuana?
 

DemonTrich

Well-Known Member
the last few times ive been to Fm, 99% of them asked for a donation, not a price for the meds. the same goes for the people that have meds to get rid of on CL and BT. donation, donation, donation, seems to be a key word.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
I have patients, they just are not high usage patients, so what am I supposed to do with my overages?
go out and socialize more.....when I burn with strangers they always ask me where I got that from....:joint:

and that '707' wouldn't mean ur from mendo would it??
i have the same pre-fix.....
 

Cory and trevor

Well-Known Member
Word to the wise, LEO has been waiting for this decision to act. I would stay away from dispensaries and farmers markets until this shakes out. We are going to see quite a bit of enforcement in the next few weeks.

Dr. Bob
You do see the merit in the clubs and the dispensaries and markets though, right? Just to be sure your personal view. it's so unreasonable to me that a person should be attached to another for their meds for so many reason chief being its unreasonable to expect every care giver to be great at all things cannabis to serve their patients with what they specifically need. Also, we can all see the wide variance in quality being put out, why deny patients the best meds because said caregiver is maxed out at 5 patients.
 

Blaze23

Well-Known Member
I like dealing with dispensaries, it was a quick and easy transaction. Now I have to go underground and deal with multiple people which sucks.
 

Tophead

Member
“We would notify dispensaries. We are not going to show up on their doorstep and surprise them,” Jester said.

Anthony Freed, who owns a dispensary in Leoni Township, was toying with the idea of shutting his shop down Friday, Feb. 8 after the ruling. He said he needed to talk to his attorney first.

He feared that law enforcement would shut down the dispensaries in the county today or tomorrow.



http://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/index.ssf/2013/02/reaction_jackson_county_medica.html#incart_river
 

potsnoberry

Active Member
a few glimmers of hope here, this decision immunizes patients who are acquiring meds from dispensaries or sources other than their designated caregiver, and accepts the word "sales" for the first time in a binding decision. it also does not mandate that communities close down all the dispensaries, it just says they can...
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
So what's the logical next step?

It seems that either a ballot initiative needs to get underway completely legalizing marijuana like CO and WA just did, or we need to put pressure on lawmakers in Lansing to further clarify the original law allowing for dispensaries and/or P2P transfers.

Which makes the most sense?
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
a few glimmers of hope here, this decision immunizes patients who are acquiring meds from dispensaries or sources other than their designated caregiver, and accepts the word "sales" for the first time in a binding decision. it also does not mandate that communities close down all the dispensaries, it just says they can...
You best believe that Bill Schutte will be trumpeting this decision as the legal basis to put forth an all-out assault on dispensaries. I'd be surprised if we don't hear from him by Monday .....
 

Cory and trevor

Well-Known Member
JACKSON MOTHERFUCKER! Prison City has it right for once, I am so proud of what our little town is saying.
“Voters approved this overwhelmingly in Jackson, it's on local leaders now to figure out how this will be zoned and administered while maintaining the integrity of our residential communities."
City Councilwoman Laura Dwyer Schlecte was disappointed in the ruling.
“I think we (the workgroup) were all in favor of the dispensaries and it was kind of a safe harbor who those who didn’t want to deal with growing it themselves," she said. "A dispensary was kind of more like going to a doctor’s office, in my opinion."
 

jang707

Member
In all honesty I may have to drop one of my patients to find a high demand patient to unload my meds on. I do t smoke very often, so its hard for me to "socialize" with other peeps. I give most of my patients free meds when they sign up with me, and alot of them that lasts until its time for me to give them more... I was under the impression that I am obligated to give my patients a reasonable amount of meds to help them. if I follow these rules I don't know how I would cover my costs
 
Top