UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if the shoe were on the other foot, it is impossible to deny that you would be ranting about an anti-paul conspiracy.sounds like you are just jealouse of his zealous knowledge of the field compared to any one of his rivals, the dude knows more than his weak minded, nothing but a suit rivals ever could period, nothing deceitful about it. It is playing by the rules. What is deceitful though is the fact that there are thousands of dead people voting for mitt and newt.... hmmm. You're obviously also very ignorant of the fact there have been rule changes this voting process , which in fact were there to give romney the benefit, but with ron paul's extreme knowledge he is doing things for his benefit, you cant out smart president paul.
and yes, there is straight up deceit involved, buckaroo. put down the fluoride and learn to read:
People in the precincts who wanted to run as delegates for the county assembly had the right to announce which candidate they supported, but they could also remain uncommitted. The uncommitted delegates, Call said, would essentially run on the premise that their fellow precinct voters could trust their judgment when it came to picking delegates to represent the right candidate.
"What we did find, however, is that a lot of the Ron Paul delegates refused to tell their caucus voters who they were supporting," Call said. "That's unfortunate to a degree because then that undermines the representative nature of caucuses and assemblies."