Ron Paul guys, this is for....you?

[UncleBuck]

I for one definitely want to see that video, bet you can't find it. We all know that RP does not want to abolish public education. He wants to abolish the dept of education, which isn't public education at all, if it were then we have only had public education since 1979 (when the dept of Education was created by law when signed by Pres. Carter on Sept 17, 1979). I think you know better than this, it's just that your candidate of choice threw you overboard about 3 years ago and you have a somewhat bruised ego.

i've posted the video several times, his words are along the lines of "of course the goal is to move towards privatizing all schools".

if all schools are private, what has been done to public education? answer: it has been abolished.

i don't get what you're saying about my candidate of choice 3 years ago, but it is amusing watching ron paul supporters flail about now that he is in the spotlight and all the shitty stuff is not flying well with people who like to vote and whatnot.

 

[UncleBuck]

Who was calling him that? Cuz in my second edition of the Carne Seca Newsletter it specifically says that Carne Seca said those things about 3 years prior to the newsletter you are referring to came out. That is literal definitive proof that Carne Seca is a MLK hater and by proxy a racial extremist and terrorist with intentions of enslaving Jews.

carne seca never said that he wrote the carne seca newsletter.

ron paul did.

your move.

 

[stumps]

I still don't see where he said he wanted public schools gone. The way I see see it he wants to end federal involvement in the program along with many other federal programs like the IRS, welfare. I just can't say no to someone that wants to limit federal involvement in day to day life.

 

[Cali chronic]

Here in lies the problem or confusion "This is a copy past from yahoo news"
That is like FOX or CNN-It is not news they produce, it is viewpoints of editors of the station who suck Billionaire Cock; who own the stations.
And we all know Billionaires do not become Billionaires, if they give a shit about the people. On rare occasion there may be one or two out there, but if One were to dig deep, I am sure they would find the dirt of yesteryear, haunting them.
Hence them doing something Philanthropist, an not being considered a tyrant. Kinda like asking your Union Rep if you should vote to strike or not. What do you think they are going to say? "NO?" Then why have a Union? " Like the Union attorney not arguing to show his worth. For whatever that is worth.
I think people do not want to investigate information for themselves and rely on someone Else's choice or opinion to make it for them. Like a Pastor in a church, how many votes does he or she cast via their congregation?

 

[budlover13]

If there were LOCAL public schools, Paul would have no issue. When public school is run by the federal government, there is an issue.

 

[UncleBuck]

If there were LOCAL public schools, Paul would have no issue. When public school is run by the federal government, there is an issue.

that's not what he said.

he didn't say the goal was to privatize all schools that are not under local control, he said privatize ALL schools, as in 100% of them.

do you know that some local communities want to teach people that a zombie who defies physics and his omnipotent dad are in control of everything and that the grand genetic diversity you see nowadays started off with two people in a garden eating fruit from a talking snake about six thousand years ago?

ron paul favors that according to you.

put it on a bumper sticker, ron paul is unelectable. like most of his supporters, he does not live in the real world.

 

[NoDrama]

i've posted the video several times, his words are along the lines of "of course the goal is to move towards privatizing all schools".

if all schools are private, what has been done to public education? answer: it has been abolished.

i don't get what you're saying about my candidate of choice 3 years ago, but it is amusing watching ron paul supporters flail about now that he is in the spotlight and all the shitty stuff is not flying well with people who like to vote and whatnot.

Is this the same video from 25 years ago that says "local control of education would be much better than federal control."?? and " Competition would ensure our children receive the best possible education"? You against a good education? Against competition? All for monopolies? Shame on you! I know you well enough to know that you are for none of those things, but you have fallen into the Mass media magnet tar pit trap, just like many others. I know why you did it, you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror , disease, there were a myriad of problems which conspired to thwart our way of life. Fear got the best of you and in your panic you voted in change and hope and all that was demanded in return was your silent obedient consent.

 

[NoDrama]

that's not what he said.

he didn't say the goal was to privatize all schools that are not under local control, he said privatize ALL schools, as in 100% of them.

do you know that some local communities want to teach people that a zombie who defies physics and his omnipotent dad are in control of everything and that the grand genetic diversity you see nowadays started off with two people in a garden eating fruit from a talking snake about six thousand years ago?

ron paul favors that according to you.

put it on a bumper sticker, ron paul is unelectable. like most of his supporters, he does not live in the real world.

RP was speaking as a pure libertarian in 1988, he is a Republican now if you hadn't noticed, he is on the debates and stuff, fer reals dude.

If you hadn't noticed, there really are people who want their children growing up believing in Jesus, Adam, Eve, garden of Eden, original sin, sacrifice, temptation, forgiveness and love and all that jazz, just like there are other people who want their children to grow up believing in some dude named Mohammad and then there are others who would rather their children grow up believing in whatever they want to believe in. Are you saying that having faith in something is bad? or are you just saying Jesus is bad? And if you are why didn't you help Mel Gibson finish off the J-Man in the torture scene in the Temptation?????

 

[NoDrama]

carne seca never said that he wrote the carne seca newsletter.

ron paul did.

your move.

Provide evidence of RP saying he wrote all the newsletters. I have evidence of Carne Seca saying he wrote all of the newsletters, you have squat.

 

[UncleBuck]

Is this the same video from 25 years ago that says "local control of education would be much better than federal control."?? and " Competition would ensure our children receive the best possible education"?

he also said the goal is to privatize ALL schools.

that it is from 25 years ago and not today is simply more revealing of his personal core beliefs than what he will say to try to gain the GOP nomination.

You against a good education? Against competition? All for monopolies? Shame on you!

no, i am actually for all those things, which is why i am for amending the public education system in the style of finland or south korea, one of those countries that does way better than we do.

i am not in favor of throwing out the baby with the bathwater, as ron paul favors. another example of his "my lai" approach to governing.

I know you well enough to know that you are for none of those things, but you have fallen into the Mass media magnet tar pit trap, just like many others. I know why you did it, you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror , disease, there were a myriad of problems which conspired to thwart our way of life. Fear got the best of you and in your panic you voted in change and hope and all that was demanded in return was your silent obedient consent.

you know me pretty well, but your thoughts in here are way off.

i voted for obama in 2008 because of the alternative, same as i will be doing this year.

and you know what? i don't regret my decision at all.

 

[UncleBuck]

Provide evidence of RP saying he wrote all the newsletters. I have evidence of Carne Seca saying he wrote all of the newsletters, you have squat.

a half a dozen newspapers covered him saying as much in interviews during the 1996 campaign, i have posted those many times.

where did carne say he wrote the carne seca newsletter?

gosh, this is so fun. watching ron paul supporters scramble now that the media spotlight is melting him like the septuagenarian that he is make me all warm and fuzzy inside.

 

[budlover13]

a half a dozen newspapers covered him saying as much in interviews during the 1996 campaign, i have posted those many times.

where did carne say he wrote the carne seca newsletter?

gosh, this is so fun. watching ron paul supporters scramble now that the media spotlight is melting him like the septuagenarian that he is make me all warm and fuzzy inside.

Melting him lol. Despite the slander i see he's still holding his LEAD in Iowa.

 

[UncleBuck]

Melting him lol. Despite the slander i see he's still holding his LEAD in Iowa.

not according to the latest polls to come out.

romney is on the rise and ron paul is on the decline.

it's all about momentum. this thing could be over sooner than i thought if romney wins iowa. i still predict a ron paul win there.

 

[budlover13]

not according to the latest polls to come out.

romney is on the rise and ron paul is on the decline.

it's all about momentum. this thing could be over sooner than i thought if romney wins iowa. i still predict a ron paul win there.

Meh. Pesky polls

Which one's have you seen?

 

[UncleBuck]

Meh. Pesky polls

Which one's have you seen?

ppp and cnn.

check out fivethirtyeight.com for the absolute best analysis.

 

[budlover13]

ppp and cnn.

check out fivethirtyeight.com for the absolute best analysis.

cnn i absolutely do NOT trust. ppp i will check out as well as 538.

Thank you

Btw, how the hell can you rely on a cnn poll given their well-documented slant on issues?

 

[UncleBuck]

cnn i absolutely do NOT trust. ppp i will check out as well as 538.

Thank you

Btw, how the hell can you rely on a cnn poll given their well-documented slant on issues?

i don't rely on them, i take their polls into account as well as others.

their polls don't deviate too much from the average at all. which forces me to ask you for examples when their scientific polls got it so very wrong.

 

[budlover13]

i don't rely on them, i take their polls into account as well as others.

their polls don't deviate too much from the average at all. which forces me to ask you for examples when their scientific polls got it so very wrong.

i refer, not so much to their method of polling, as to their often misleading portrayal of the results.

 

[UncleBuck]

i refer, not so much to their method of polling, as to their often misleading portrayal of the results.

thus, their scientific polls which i cite as part of my overall portfolio of evidence are not unreliable.

empirical evidence proves as much.

 

[budlover13]

thus, their scientific polls which i cite as part of my overall portfolio of evidence are not unreliable.

empirical evidence proves as much.

While i prepare to hop in bed after a nice SD bowl, let it not be misconstrued that i support cnn's polling methods. Tbh, i don't know enough about their methods to pass judgement.

HOWEVER, i must say that given their slanted reporting on the results, one can only assume that they are looking to pollsters that support their leanings.