• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Ron Paul guys, this is for....you?

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
its sad this is the only "Dirt" they have on Ron Paul lmao, people aren't buying this, this is only good for Ron Paul because he is getting attention.
we have plenty more dirt.

have you already forgotten the video of him stating he wants to abolish public education? that won't play out well in a general election.

this is the easiest route to take because people do buy it. even if they don't believe he wrote it, they comment upon how stupid you have to be to let such writings go out under his name.

also, there is the whole bungling of the handling. he said he wrote it, he said someone else wrote it, he said he read them, he said he never read them. the handling of this all is just pathetic. not presidential at all.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
we have plenty more dirt.

have you already forgotten the video of him stating he wants to abolish public education? that won't play out well in a general election.
No he didn't say that. he doesn't have the power to do that. he said in a perfect world that is what you want to work toward.

this is the easiest route to take because people do buy it. even if they don't believe he wrote it, they comment upon how stupid you have to be to let such writings go out under his name.
Only an agenda driven turtle would think that. He had nothing to do with the newsletters as he hadn't been in Congress and the newsletters had changed hands. He didn't read them and he wasn't the writer or editor.
He did say he had moral obligation to have his name disassociated with the newsletters.


also, there is the whole bungling of the handling. he said he wrote it,
No he didn't you have no proof. Just anothe lie on your part.
he said someone else wrote it,
no shit sherlock, since he didn't write them someone else had to
he said he read them, he said he never read them.
he never said he read them, that's another lie
the handling of this all is just pathetic.
You're post is pathetic because once again you make things up. He refuted it the first time he heard it. He mentioned it goes against everything he has ever said. No one has any proof showing otherwise.
not presidential at all.
Because someone wrote something and tried to say it was Ron Paul means that? You really are dumb. I'm not saying that only because you are anti American and pro Israel either. There are plenty of other reasons you are clueless. The funny thing is Ron Paul is a lot more pro Israel than you are.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No he didn't say that. he doesn't have the power to do that. he said in a perfect world that is what you want to work toward.


Only an agenda driven turtle would think that. He had nothing to do with the newsletters as he hadn't been in Congress and the newsletters had changed hands. He didn't read them and he wasn't the writer or editor.
He did say he had moral obligation to have his name disassociated with the newsletters.



No he didn't you have no proof. Just anothe lie on your part.

no shit sherlock, since he didn't write them someone else had to

he never said he read them, that's another lie

You're post is pathetic because once again you make things up. He refuted it the first time he heard it. He mentioned it goes against everything he has ever said. No one has any proof showing otherwise.

Because someone wrote something and tried to say it was Ron Paul means that? You really are dumb. I'm not saying that only because you are anti American and pro Israel either. There are plenty of other reasons you are clueless. The funny thing is Ron Paul is a lot more pro Israel than you are.
i highlighted the relevant parts. insults really drive it home.

"you're post is pathetic". :clap:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ignore and deny the truth really helps you learn. But you know better than Netanyahu, right? You are pathetic :clap:
topping insults with more insults?

i didn't even provoke you lately. can you just please calm down and save the insults for when someone else throws them first?

it makes it funnier that way.
 

deprave

New Member
topping insults with more insults?

i didn't even provoke you lately. can you just please calm down and save the insults for when someone else throws them first?

it makes it funnier that way.
So are you going to respond or is this your rebuttal to his post?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So are you going to respond or is this your rebuttal to his post?
when someone insults you, what is there to respond to?

i am not making a rebuttal, i am making a small attempt at moderating. minor insults seem to be ok for those with thick enough skin to frequent the politics section, but parker is just making them without provocation now.

as i have come to know him, parker only insults when he was insulted first.

my two cents.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
Well you could respond with proof or any evidence that makes your statement legit.

But you know there is none because us "cultists" have read every report. When you find a pro Paul report there is no comments but the negative ones have hundreds of comment proving them wrong
 

fenderburn84

Well-Known Member
What the Fuck does this have to do with Israel? Imo an insult is what most fools hide behind to try to save face. It's sad to see that as a first response to an opposing view it really is a shame. But I guess its the net and people get real brave whilst on a computer. I will say this and then shut up. If you support Ron Paul throwing out stupid cockeyed ideas and insults does not help your cause in any way.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
What the Fuck does this have to do with Israel? Imo an insult is what most fools hide behind to try to save face. It's sad to see that as a first response to an opposing view it really is a shame. But I guess its the net and people get real brave whilst on a computer. I will say this and then shut up. If you support Ron Paul throwing out stupid cockeyed ideas and insults does not help your cause in any way.
i dont see it quote is?
 

fenderburn84

Well-Known Member
Nobody said there was an insult about Jews I was asking what it had to do with Israel. The insult talk was about the conversation that was being had and the insults being hurled around. I do apologize for any confusion.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
we have plenty more dirt.

have you already forgotten the video of him stating he wants to abolish public education? that won't play out well in a general election.
I for one definitely want to see that video, bet you can't find it. We all know that RP does not want to abolish public education. He wants to abolish the dept of education, which isn't public education at all, if it were then we have only had public education since 1979 (when the dept of Education was created by law when signed by Pres. Carter on Sept 17, 1979). I think you know better than this, it's just that your candidate of choice threw you overboard about 3 years ago and you have a somewhat bruised ego.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Except when he was calling him a communist and philanderer of course.
Who was calling him that? Cuz in my second edition of the Carne Seca Newsletter it specifically says that Carne Seca said those things about 3 years prior to the newsletter you are referring to came out. That is literal definitive proof that Carne Seca is a MLK hater and by proxy a racial extremist and terrorist with intentions of enslaving Jews.
 
Top