Redoctober
Well-Known Member
Sorry to hear about the yield UnderCurrent. That's a bit disappointing considering how much you put into it (24 bulbs). Would you attribute it solely to the lights, or were there any other factors involved? Was it lack of light penetration that caused it? I forget how many plants you were doing. Did you change anything else from your HPS grows to this one besides the lights, and were you using an equivalent wattage of T5 that you would have been using with HPS?Started a new batch today this will be the first time I'll be cloning from the start with the par bulbs. I'll compare average time of root onset compared to Mh light. My first flowering with these lights didn't turn out great as far as yield but I just sampled a small nug tonight and MY GOD is it potent! I'll be doing a solo cup Uc grow and will continue to flower using this light hoping for a greater yield.
Happy to hear about the quality however! So far we have two similar reviews of the T5 flowering performance: lower yield but increased quality. Although hyroot had an asterisk next to his grow because of a few non-T5 related issues. Anecdotally I believe BendMC on another forum said he had relatively comparable HPS and T5 yields, and he wasn't even using PAR bulbs, just the Quantum veg 6000 and bloom 3000.
I still remain optimistic that it is possible to achieve comparable yields to HPS, but maybe I'm just talking myself into it because I'm financially and emotionally invested in T5 now lol!