sync0s
Well-Known Member
You know what makes me laugh, is the fact that you think that you know what you are arguing about. I'm certainly not arguing against the NAACP. I'm advocating that private groups SHOULD have the right to offer their services to whom they like. YOU are arguing against it, as little as you realize it. You and UB consistently have stuck behind the argument of "They may be on private land and privately owned, but they serve the public" and here you are finding a few organizations that meet the same criteria and you are defending it. How do you not see the hypocrisy in it? Can you not just stop and reflect on it momentarily and admit this fact?You know what makes me laugh is the fact that most people don't even know that the NAACP was started by a group of white people who did not like the treatment of blacks back in the day...and for the record NAACP was founded on the notion of equal treatment for all ( sorry but white folks were not getting beaten, lynched, and treated unfairly so it was no need to defend them)...also anyone can join the NAACP even Mexicans..so I guess you might want to read upon the organization before you say what it did and did not do..
It's so sad that I am sitting here, actually in support of these groups I mentioned, and trying to make a point of defending these groups RIGHTS, and in your "defense" of the group you are arguing AGAINST me. NAACP doesn't ask for a fee of membership to get an "African American" only scholarship (I put that in quotes because that term is wrong to be used on people who are not from Africa), so why should a private business have to do the same in order to do it? Would it be okay if the NAACP opened a private clinic on the corner only serving black people who can't afford health? Absolutely not, but we need to stop discriminating that right to certain organizations and denying others. It's not fair, it's not just, and it's not American.